This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A Hungarian law firm is partnering with a Los Angeles legaltech company and a legal industry influencer to create an international database of pro bono attorneys willing to represent Ukrainian refugees in need of immigration or asylum aid, and they are looking for more attorneys to sign up. Firms can help in preparing.
Q: Will AI replace legalsecretaries? A: AI has the potential to automate certain tasks traditionally performed by legalsecretaries, but it's unlikely to completely replace the role. Legalsecretaries often handle various administrative tasks, communication management, and document preparation.
I also think the fact ChatGPT has been overhyped, like other legaltech that didn’t live up to the hype, makes lawyers skeptical. And sadly, it reduced the need for legalsecretaries. The concerns that whatever they put into ChatGPT could become publicly available.
She turned down the paid opportunity she was offered to work as a legalsecretary. A daughter of the West, her first job after graduating from high school two years early and Stanford Law School at a breathtaking two-year clip was to work as an unpaid county attorney. Such was the lot of women in law at the time.
I also think the fact ChatGPT has been overhyped, like other legaltech that didn’t live up to the hype, makes lawyers skeptical. And sadly, it reduced the need for legalsecretaries. The concerns that whatever they put into ChatGPT could become publicly available.
Suppose next week begins with one of your top paralegals or legalsecretaries giving you two weeks’ notice. Maybe they are moving to another location or another local law firm. But now you have an opening to fill. The first response is not about filling the position.
Suppose next week begins with one of your top paralegals or legalsecretaries giving you two weeks’ notice. Maybe they are moving to another location or another local law firm. But now you have an opening to fill. The first response is not about filling the position.
But then when times get busy, they’re adding paralegals, legalsecretaries. And what we think we’re seeing is that these mid sized law firms are actually keeping a very consistent amount of workload per lawyer. And they’re recording more time and doing more work. And then when things slow down, then we see again that ratio drops.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content