Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 13, 2025

But courts may take divergent paths on those issues, especially given the fact-specific nature of many of the plaintiffs challenges, which depend not only on their specific claimed rights but also on the way each AI company has trained their model and how those models function. Ross Intelligence (Case No. Anthropic (Case No. 23 CV 1092).

Litigator 52

Litigator Litigation Intellectual Property Defendant 52

Lawyerist

MARCH 18, 2025

Learn everything from AI basics ( e.g. , A Brief History of Legal AI: A Look Back and a Preview of Whats Next), to the nuts and bolts ( e.g. , 60 Generative AI Use Cases in 60 Minutes), to ethical considerations ( e.g. , Evaluating AI for Law Practice: Benefits, Risks, and Practical Ethics), and AIs broader impact on the law ( e.g. , Digital Justice: (..)

Legal tech 52

Legal tech Legal tech Hearing Document management 52

Above the Law - Technology

MAY 31, 2023

You know, someone should have felt like something was up when the filing opened up with Lorem ipsum. The post If You Aren’t The One Writing Your Briefs In Texas, It Better Be Some Other Human! appeared first on Above the Law.

Judge 252

Judge Law Law Court 252

Debevoise Data Blog

FEBRUARY 14, 2025

Thomson Reuters filed suit back in 2020, alleging that ROSS had used its copyrighted Westlaw headnotes and other materials as training data for ROSS competing legal AI product. Thomson Reuters claimed that thousands of ROSSs legal memos are infringing copies of its Westlaw headnotes. some creative spark. 340 (1991).

Court 52

Court Intellectual Property Defendant Legal research 52

TechLaw Crossroads

DECEMBER 19, 2022

The challenge for tools like Westlaw Precision and other AI legal research tools has been that different courts, judges, and even lawyers, use different terms and words to describe the same things and concepts.

Legal AI 52

Legal AI Machine learning Legal research Lawyer 52

LawSites

MARCH 18, 2024

Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. It’s a great failure of our judges, courts and legislatures that they’ve allowed — and continue to allow to this day — commercial entities to mingle their owned commentary with our official law.

Court 134

Court Judge Time-tracking Legal research 134

Legal Tech Monitor

AUGUST 22, 2023

They co-authored a paper on subtle errors in legal AI. Travers Smith is exploring AI for tasks like contract review but not yet for work product. This wide-ranging discussion provides an inside look at how one forward-thinking firm is advancing legal AI in a prudent and ethical manner.

Legal AI 52

Legal AI Judge Time-tracking Lawyer 52

Lawmatics

NOVEMBER 7, 2023

Yes, legal software typically includes AI tools that legal professionals can use to create legal documents. In fact, legal AI tools can be used in multiple ways in the legal industry – as long as they are leveraged correctly. How is AI Used in Legal Technology?

Client Intake 59

Client Intake Due diligence Legal advice Analytics 59

Above the Law - Technology

DECEMBER 4, 2023

Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. It also improves access to justice for society as lawyers can handle more cases, as well as remove some bias from the legal system through fact-first drafting. 14-17, 2024, in Chicago. Please review them.

Litigation 325

Litigation Litigator Mediator Law firm 325

Legal Tech Monitor

JULY 19, 2023

Over the years, the list has included a diverse selection of lawyers, legal technologists, policymakers, judges, law librarians, bar association executives, and people from all walks of life who are innovating in the legal profession. (I Joshua Walker , CEO, System.Legal; Co-Founder, CodeX; Author, On Legal AI.

Analytics 40

Analytics International law Legal research Judge 40

Legal Tech Monitor

MARCH 18, 2024

Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. It’s a great failure of our judges, courts and legislatures that they’ve allowed — and continue to allow to this day — commercial entities to mingle their owned commentary with our official law.

Court 52

Court Judge Time-tracking Legal research 52

Legal Tech Monitor

DECEMBER 4, 2023

Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. It also improves access to justice for society as lawyers can handle more cases, as well as remove some bias from the legal system through fact-first drafting. 14-17, 2024, in Chicago. Please review them.

Litigation 52

Litigation Litigator Mediator Law firm 52

Legal Tech Monitor

APRIL 11, 2023

That all said, a good percentage of prep work that litigators perform leverages AI behind the scenes in their research, and increasingly strategy. Legal outcomes can now be empirically weighed via prediction models using similar natured, previously litigated cases, and their docket information by judge and jurisdiction.

Legal AI 59

Legal AI Dispute resolution Judge Litigation 59

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

JANUARY 15, 2024

In this episode, Marlene Gebauer interviews attendees at two recent legal tech conferences – the TLTF Summit and the Legal AI Pathfinder’s Assembly. She asks them about the biggest impacts they foresee AI and other innovations having on the legal industry in 2024.

Legal tech 264

Legal tech Legal tech Hearing Time-tracking 264

Legal Tech Monitor

JANUARY 15, 2024

In this episode, Marlene Gebauer interviews attendees at two recent legal tech conferences – the TLTF Summit and the Legal AI Pathfinder’s Assembly. She asks them about the biggest impacts they foresee AI and other innovations having on the legal industry in 2024.

Legal tech 52

Legal tech Legal tech Hearing Time-tracking 52