This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
State Bar of Texas Podcast host Rocky Dhir digs deep for as many puns as possible for his, uh hem, unfiltered interview with the cat lawyer himself and the patient judge who provided expert tech support. Not surprisingly, he soon realized that the need for legaladvice in this area was more than one lawyer could handle.
This level of transparency helps to promote accountability and fairness in the legal system. A study conducted by the University of Michigan found that judges who use an algorithm to determine bail decisions are less likely to be biased in their decision-making. Another example is the use of chatbots in legal services.
This could lead to unfair or discriminatory results if the model is used for tasks such as contract review or legal decision-making. Finally, ChatGPT is a machine learning model, it’s not able to provide legaladvice or make legal decisions, it’s only able to assist with tasks like document generation or legal research.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Most legaltech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced.
Help pick the 15 legaltech startups that will get to compete at the seventh-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2023. In past years, the judges narrowed the ballot to 25 semifinalists. Learn more about this company at the LawNext LegalTech Directory. We have listed 40 companies on the ballot as semifinalists.
Legal analytics: AI-driven legal analytics tools provide insights into trends, precedents, and the behavior of judges. This information can be valuable for lawyers in building stronger cases and making more informed legal decisions. Risk management: AI is useful for assessing and managing legal risks.
A few software developers, a designer, a legal professional, and the team was ready to go. Next step – Fast.Law Although volunteer lawyers around the world have committed over 4m hours of pro bono work globally, the need for free legaladvice provision internationally remains much larger.
Surprisingly, the survey found that legaltech, data literacy, and legal operations don't enjoy the same level of recognition and importance." Perhaps these established attorneys assume that law students and newly-minted lawyers learn what they need to know about tech in law school, but this is not typically the case.
And I spent a lot of my time in the early years of practice as your listeners are, for sure familiar, you know, in the legal research universe, trying to find the right cases, running endless Boolean search strings, right. Or, you know, what if it contradicts what the law, you know, what a judge would say. I want to that.
Legal conferences unite professionals to share knowledge and discuss legal field advancements. Conferences unite lawyers, judges, paralegals, and legaltech experts, fostering collaboration, learning, and networking among legal practitioners.
The ATJ Commission provided grant funding to the First Circuit and Land of Lincoln Legal Aid’s Southern Regional Office in Carbondale to support infrastructure and technology updates needed for remote appearances. Staying up to date on issues impacting the legal profession is vital to your success.
Shawn Curren 3:18 I think for you know, I’ve been in the legaltech industry now for about 20 years. And I sort of talked about this a lot, which Yeah, I was around, you know, before the digitization of legal services, but everything was paper based. And I think, clearly, lots of legaltech vendors are seeing the same thing.
Examples of new delivery methods include using technology tools to help people complete forms, identify whether they have a legal issue or understand if they qualify for relief, and training people who are not lawyers to offer legaladvice in limited areas.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Most legaltech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced.
They help people on matters related to family law, domestic violence, elder abuse, housing, and debt collection—matters that often have the highest rates of self-represented litigants (SRLs) and that comprise a majority of legal matters in our civil justice system. They can also communicate with opposing parties to help resolve matters.
Shawn Curren 3:18 I think for you know, I’ve been in the legaltech industry now for about 20 years. And I sort of talked about this a lot, which Yeah, I was around, you know, before the digitization of legal services, but everything was paper based. And I think, clearly, lots of legaltech vendors are seeing the same thing.
And I spent a lot of my time in the early years of practice as your listeners are, for sure familiar, you know, in the legal research universe, trying to find the right cases, running endless Boolean search strings, right. Or, you know, what if it contradicts what the law, you know, what a judge would say. I want to that.
I felt like it gave me a chance to learn the business side of companies, startups, new initiatives in a way that I didn’t always see as the lawyer in the room being asked for legaladvice. I’m not judging people. And then I need to really examine that. And I often challenge those assumptions in coaching.
Richard Susskind Opens with 10 Minutes on LegalTechLegaltech started in the 1950s. The history since then falls under 4 categories: Another 4 headings about tech generally Exponential growth across the board Increasingly capable Increasingly pervasive Increasingly connected These combined lead to a new economy.
Fourteen years ago this week, a federal judge in Seattle dismissed the class action complain t filed by two lawyers seeking to shut down the lawyer-rating site Avvo, which had launched five months earlier. District Judge Robert S. LegalTech Look-Back is a continuing series of posts that turn back the calendar on legaltech news.).
Fourteen years ago this week, a federal judge in Seattle dismissed the class action complain t filed by two lawyers seeking to shut down the lawyer-rating site Avvo, which had launched five months earlier. District Judge Robert S. LegalTech Look-Back is a continuing series of posts that turn back the calendar on legaltech news.).
Listen on mobile platforms: Apple Podcasts | Spotify Twitter: @gebauerm , or @glambert Voicemail: 713-487-7821 Email: geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com Music: Jerry David DeCicca Transcript Greg Lambert 0:07 Welcome to The Geek in Review the podcast focused on innovative and creative ideas in the legal industry.
And I think can’t remember who it was on Twitter, it was like, well, never underestimate the ability for a judge to make something even more complicated than it needs to be. Many of us know Christian through his great work through Reynen Court through the New York legaltech meetup and as an advisor with LexFusion.
For more insights from Jan Scholtes, visit his blog, LegalTech Bridge. On the other hand, I strongly believe in the combination of machines and humans, especially for these legal but also for medical applications. His recommendation is that if all you are offered is and AI Black Box, then you should simply walk away.
Listen on mobile platforms: Apple Podcasts | Spotify Twitter: @gebauerm , or @glambert Voicemail: 713-487-7821 Email: geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com Music: Jerry David DeCicca Transcript Greg Lambert 0:07 Welcome to The Geek in Review the podcast focused on innovative and creative ideas in the legal industry.
And I think can’t remember who it was on Twitter, it was like, well, never underestimate the ability for a judge to make something even more complicated than it needs to be. Many of us know Christian through his great work through Reynen Court through the New York legaltech meetup and as an advisor with LexFusion.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content