This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If youre considering bringing a lawsuit, or if youve been sued by someone else, you may come across a lot of unfamiliar terms and concepts. A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. Whats a Statute of Limitations?
It has been a while since I have written about the copyright lawsuit by legal research giant Thomson Reuters against the no-shuttered legal research startup Ross Intelligence, in which TR alleges that Ross stole copyright content from Westlaw to build its own completing legal research product. See all stories about this lawsuit.
“We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. The Toronto-based company recently closed a $2.1
In what it described as a case pitting “real lawyers against a robot lawyer,” a federal court in Illinois has dismissed a law firm’s suit against the self-help legal service DoNotPay. District Chief Judge Nancy Rosenstengel. A second California lawsuit, Lee v.
Brett Trout In a significant decision for copyright law and legal technology, Judge Stephanos Bibas granted partial summary judgment in favor of Thomson Reuters, rejecting ROSS Intelligences fair use defense in a closely watched lawsuit over the use of Westlaws legal content.
Talk about court red-handed Thomas Claburn Demonstrating yet again that uncritically trusting the output of generative AI is dangerous, attorneys involved in a product liability lawsuit have apologized to the presiding judge for submitting documents that cite non-existent legal cases.
I hope other judges will consider this opinion when confronted with similar plaintiffs’ arguments. If I were the plaintiffs, I would file an amended complaint trying to address the judge’s issues, then appeal if that isn’t successful. Activision appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
What Do You Need To Prove in a Birth Injury Lawsuit? Birth injury lawsuits usually involve negligence claims. Jurors and judges generally arent familiar with the medical profession. Frivolous lawsuits could increase the costs of malpractice insurance, which are passed down to consumers. How Is Cerebral Palsy Treated?
Last month, Greg Abbott, the governor of Texas, signed Senate Bill 4, a law that allows police officers in Texas to arrest migrants who enter the state illegally.
But today the judge overseeing the trial, 3rd […] ROSS Intelligence, in which TR is alleging that the now-shuttered legal research startup ROSS violated its copyrights by stealing content from Westlaw to build its own product.
BY DEBRA CASSENS WEISS A lawyer who wanted his pleadings to stand out has been ordered to remove a large purple dragon watermark from each page of a lawsuit that he filed in federal court. Magistrate Judge Ray Kent of the Western District of Michigan ordered lawyer Jacob A. Nor can the firm include the logo on other new filings.
After applying statutory damages caps, the judge awarded over $10 million, which was affirmed on appeal. The Elder Law Center in the Justia Legal Guides describes some red flags that family members of a nursing home resident should bear in mind when visiting their loved one. The jury agreed, issuing a $160 million verdict.
Whether youre a law student attempting to master case briefing, or a lawyer seeking to re-learn this skill to advocate more effectively, this blog post provides a useful cheat sheet to make tackling case briefs more efficient. For law students, this will be the main takeaway of the case, as intended by your professor.
This is where law firm predictive analytics come to the rescue. By leveraging AI and other technologies, law firms can uncover patterns and trends across vast datasetsturning raw information into actionable insight. What is predictive analytics for law firms?
Represented by lawyers Maria Cristina Armenta and Credence Elizabeth Sol (who keep expanding their oeuvre of failed lawsuits against Internet services), Daniels claimed YouTube had to comply with 1983 because YouTube became a state actor. Alphabet appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Case citation: Daniels v.
See all stories about this lawsuit. But ROSS countered that the databases TR maintains of public law and its legal search tools are, in fact, separate products, and that TR conditions access to the databases on purchase of the search tools. Judge Leonard P. Stark — who previously presided over the case as a U.S.
Last year, the Ninth Circuit said that plaintiffs could get around Section 230 in their lawsuit against the app maker YOLO because the app maker said it would ban users for inappropriate statements and would unmask harassers. So where exactly is the Ninth Circuit’s law on this topic? I don’t know. Case Citation : Bride v.
This long-running lawsuit started in 2019. When I first blogged this case in January 2021, I wrote: This lawsuit, like many others before it, claims that UGC services like YouTube commit illegal discrimination based on how they moderate content. Google appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
You may have heard about Squishmallow’s recent lawsuit against Build-a-Bear over plushy knockoffs. Yet, the SAD Scheme jurisprudential distortion field worked its magic once again, and the judge rejected their legitimate pushback. The judge subsequently held the marketplaces in contempt for violating the injunction.
Last Friday, the parties stipulated to dismiss their lawsuit, with Meta formally waiving its right to appeal the controversial January 23rd decision from Judge Chen. Given that most observers in this space were surprised by Judge Chen’s summary judgment decision, Meta’s decision not to appeal seems even more surprising.
With substantial assistance from judges, rightsowners use these dynamics to extract settlements from online vendors without satisfying basic procedural safeguards like serving the complaint and establishing personal jurisdiction over defendants. 32nd Annual DePaul Law Review Symposium , Chicago, April 14, 2023. Free RSVP!
This lawsuit purports to focuses on the allegedly defective operation of the services’ reporting tools, but the plaintiffs’ goal was to hold the services accountable for their alleged inaction in response to some reports. Such allegations fail to state a claim under products liability law. removal of the reported videos.
The court says that Printify took appropriate steps when it learned of infringing items via Atari’s lawsuit: First, Printify searched its own database for the 70 URLs identified by Atari in ECF No. 25, 2024) Related posts * Ninth Circuit Highlights the Messy Law of Contributory Trademark Infringement Online–YYGM v. Printify, Inc.,
We used to see lawsuits like this 15+ years ago, but we don’t see them any more because they are so obviously doomed by Section 230. If I were a judge, I would sanction that argument harshly. I think he would have certainly owed a fee-shift if the court had applied anti-SLAPP laws. Whoa, what a flashback. The complaint.
”] This lawsuits raises one of the venerable but surprisingly vexing copyright law questions: when is a price copyrightable? ” And yet…the copyright law jurisprudence is littered with cases saying or implying that individual prices could be copyrightable (e.g., This lawsuit was filed in early January.
Gone are the days when judges were unaware that AI is simply a tool that one may apply to many generic problems. Implications for Patent Filings This decision underscores the importance of claim drafting in patents covering new applications of artificial intelligence.
If that rings a bell, it’s because just yesterday I blogged on a DIFFERENT fish painter, DeYoung, who also brought an IP lawsuit against a print-on-demand service (Pixels). New practice area alert for law students: the specialty niche of fish artists asserting IP claims against print-on-demand services. Volitional Conduct.
The US government brought a civil lawsuit against the defendants for 203 violations. Stripping this system down to its Internet Law basics, the defendants apparently run a walled garden app store for car modification apps. Credit also goes to the defense team from Greenberg Traurig and Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.
The past year was marked by many more filed cases than decisions, and those decisions that were issued largely demonstrated how well-known pitfalls will also hamper this new wave of AI lawsuits. 6] Despite these challenges, plaintiffs are not slowing down, and new lawsuits were filed at a steady clip over the course of 2024.
In my last post , I discussed how evolving technology will continue to influence our relationships and thus, impact family law. We have all heard about the lawsuit involving Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. This is often the case in family law matters. Even public figures are not immune to the potential impact of text messages.
Because patent law isnt just about filling out forms and submitting diagrams. They know how judges interpret vague language, how opposing counsel attacks claim construction, and how the slightest ambiguity can make or break a case. In fact,no two patent attorneys would draft the same patent for the same invention.
By Charles Lane A federal judge on Friday tossed out a pre-emptive lawsuit from Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman, who sought to stave off legal action by New York Attorney General Letitia James over his decision banning transgender women from playing sports at county-owned facilities, James’ office said. Read more…
Based on this ruling, Viral DRM’s earlier SAD Scheme lawsuit also may have been deficient on copyright standing grounds. Judge Balks at SAD Scheme JoinderZaful v. Schedule A Defendants Judge Rejects SAD Scheme JoinderToyota v. Schedule A Defendants Another Judge Balks at SAD Scheme JoinderXie v. 2025 WL 660250 (N.D.
After a couple of defendants showed up, the judge denied a TRO extension because of the possible lack of merit in the plaintiff’s infringement allegations. Not exactly much disincentives for plaintiffs to keep shotgunning SAD Scheme lawsuits. Then, the case fell apart. Schedule A Defendants , 1:23-cv-02605-JLR (S.D.N.Y.
In the lawsuit I’m covering today, Roblox named over 250 defendants. ” Presumably, a test buy would suffice under 7th Circuit law, but I guess Roblox didn’t do the test buys. This hardline approach irritated this judge. In practice, the judge didn’t even apply its logic to the rest of the lawsuit.
Judge Balks at SAD Scheme JoinderZaful v. Schedule A Defendants Judge Rejects SAD Scheme JoinderToyota v. Schedule A Defendants Another Judge Balks at SAD Scheme JoinderXie v. Annex A Will Judges Become More Skeptical of Joinder in SAD Scheme Cases?Dongguan Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme CasesViral DRM v.
Last month, Greg Abbott, the governor of Texas, signed Senate Bill 4, a law that allows police officers in Texas to arrest migrants who enter the state illegally. The new law also allows Texas judges to order migrants to leave.
In my Internet Law course, I still teach the Pharmatrak case from 2003, where an analytics service provider used a pixel and other tracking technology. There are hundreds of pixel lawsuits in the courts right now (and surely more to come after a ruling like this). Using a pixel to track users is an Old School practice.
Before AI, I wade through the case and prepare a summary the way I may have done so as a clerk during law school. With the insertion of the url, asking that the summary be bulleted and be writtten in the tone of the source (the clerk or judge who wrote the decision), I receive the below. How do I get the summary?
Every SAD Scheme lawsuit is problematic, though the specific reasons may differ. Each lawsuit creates dozens or hundreds of individual dramas, few of which receive any public scrutiny, and usually comes at the cost of due process and the rule of law. As usual, the supervising judge affirmed without substantive comment.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
The EPA civilly sued eBay for third-party merchant listings of items that violate environmental laws. eBay defeats the lawsuit. v EZ Lynk case I blogged in April, strangely not cited by the judge. Presumably the downplayed language was designed to discourage class action lawsuits). Is eBay the “Seller”?
Managing people is tough, and employment issues are among the thorniest that law firm managers must face. Here’s advice on law firm risk management from a managing partner who also represents those disgruntled employees. Here are a few observations and tips from an employment lawyer who also manages a law firm.
” Congress enacted this requirement to restrict patent trolls who were filing lawsuits against defendants who had nothing in common but the allegation that they were infringing the same patent. We recently saw how Judge Pacold used Section 299 to cause a SAD Scheme patent case to fall apart. This is not a hard call. Alibaba N.D.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content