Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 13, 2025

But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights.

Litigation 52

Litigation Litigator Intellectual Property Defendant 52

Eric Goldman

AUGUST 24, 2023

Some forms of data are protected by copyright, trademark, or another cognizable forms of intellectual property. But most of the data on the Internet isn’t easily protectible as intellectual property by those who might have an incentive to protect it.

Intellectual Property 98

Intellectual Property Court Litigation Litigator 98

Eric Goldman

FEBRUARY 21, 2025

With respect to the balance of hardships, the court says “Next Level will not experience meaningful hardship as a result of the TRO because Next Level will only be enjoined from misappropriating Invisible Narratives’ intellectual property.” Longarzo * DMCAs Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law ClaimsStevens v.

Intellectual Property 40

Intellectual Property Court Hearing State law 40

Berkley Technology Law Journal

JULY 9, 2022

Much of Professor Van Houweling’s research focuses on copyright law’s implications for new information technologies. On today’s episode, my colleagues Kavya Dasari and Chris Musachio sit down with Professor Van Houweling to discuss property rights in the metaverse. And thank you for joining us today.

Intellectual Property 130

Intellectual Property Law Law Court 130

Eric Goldman

MARCH 22, 2025

Laura Heymann (William & Mary Law) Jeffrey Hunt Angie Jin Josh King Jonathan Klinger Prof. Stacey Lantagne (now of Western New England Law) Prof. Christa Laser (Cleveland State Law) Prof. Yassine Lefouili (Toulouse School of Economics) David Levine (Elon Law) Yoram Lichtenstein Prof. Jeff Kosseff (U.S.

Law 52

Law Law Intellectual Property Failure-to-appear 52

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 13, 2023

Section 301(a) of the Copyright Act provides that “no person is entitled to any such right or equivalent right in any such work under the common law or statutes of any State.” With that, any state or common law claim that is equivalent to copyright must therefore be preempted. But normative judgments aside, ProCD v.

Judge 98

Judge Court Defendant State law 98

Justia Legal Marketing & Technology blog

JANUARY 20, 2023

Some of them contain 50-state surveys that track variations in state laws on a key issue. Family Law Matters involving domestic relations tend to have high stakes, financially and emotionally. Many of these consequences involve the division of money and property.

Intellectual Property 130

Intellectual Property Workers Compensation Bankruptcy Estate planning 130