This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The standard attendance was up from 600 to 800 this year, but with new found collaborations from additional organizations including the California Judges Association, there were 1,300 legal professionals gathered to participate in cross-over programming designed to benefit everyone involved. . CLAAnnualMeeting19 pic.twitter.com/famxE2jXs0.
After many rounds of motions to dismiss, intellectualproperty cases against AI developers are moving into the discovery phase. On January 27, 2025, a federal judge in the Northern District of California ordered OpenAI to produce a dataset to plaintiffs counsel that was used by the company to train its generative AI model, GPT-4.
I’m pleased to share a draft of a new paper, “ A SAD New Category of Abusive IntellectualPropertyLitigation.” Readers’ most common reaction to the paper is outrage/anger about how the system is being gamed in a way that undermines judicial integrity–in some cases, with the judges’ help.
Developers of artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems notched a victory last week when a federal judge dismissed claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) premised on the use of copyrighted works in AI training data, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to show any concrete harm and therefore lacked standing to bring their claims.
Likening the process of crafting headnotes to that of a sculptor chiseling through marble, Judge Bibas wrote that a sculptor creates a sculpture by choosing what to cut away and what to leave in place. some creative spark. Feist Publications, Inc. 340 (1991). To subscribe to the Data Blog, please click here.
I am a big fan of litigation analytics, even once suggesting that it could be malpractice for a litigator not to use the technology. Analytics might tell you, for example, that, in intellectualproperty cases, Judge Smith decides summary judgment motions for plaintiffs 70% of the time. Likelihood of Winning.
Among these roles, lawyers and litigators often create confusion due to their similarities. In this comprehensive blog post, we will delve into the world of litigators, shedding light on their specific role and how it differs from that of a lawyer. What is a Litigator?
But this assertion is belied by the “Create-a-Star” feature and by evidence produced at trial establishing that Defendants previously altered tattoos of wrestlers to avoid infringing on others’ intellectualproperty.” If not, then Alexander will come up completely dry after years of costly litigation.
I’m pleased to share the final published version of my article, “ A SAD Scheme of Abusive IntellectualPropertyLitigation.” ” The article explains how IP rightsowners are twisting the rule of law to obtain ex parte TROs that prompt online marketplaces to freeze the defendants’ cash and accounts.
The judge in this case, Charles Breyer (former Justice Breyer’s younger brother), was not persuaded: Chegg may well be right. I feel like 19 out of 20 judges would have just granted this injunction. But not Judge Charles Breyer! This is the most interesting part of the case for me.
For instance, machine learning can predict litigation risks based on similar cases, identify trends that might impact a client, or flag unusual clauses in contracts that might need extra attention. Its particularly useful for litigation teams looking to analyze case trends, predict outcomes, and gain insights into opposing counsel or judges.
The clinic students advise their clients on just about any legal issue du jour keeping the founder up at night, such as privacy law, regulatory compliance, hiring workers, intellectualproperty protection, and setting up an entity. The ELC is but one of three separate “real life” work experiences required of the Tech Edge JD students.
This podcast offers indispensable knowledge for managing complex data in litigation. From discussions on legal ethics and practice management to insights on specific areas of law like intellectualproperty. Through interviews with female lawyers, judges, and legal professionals.
This podcast offers indispensable knowledge for managing complex data in litigation. From discussions on legal ethics and practice management to insights on specific areas of law like intellectualproperty. Through interviews with female lawyers, judges, and legal professionals.
In a November ruling, a magistrate judge notes that the lawsuit appears to be the first of its kindone in which a social media influencer accuses another influencer of (among other things) copyright infringement based on the similarities between their posts that promote the same products.
Michael Sander , the founder of Docket Alarm , a product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case analytics, has left the company, seven months after its acquisition by legal research company vLex in April. ” Daniel Ivtsan vLex has named Daniel Ivtsan as the new head of product for Docket Alarm.
Judith Sheindlin (Judge Judy, 1942 to Present): Known as a household name, Judge Judy has been a trailblazer in the legal world. She is an American court-show arbitrator, media personality, television producer, philanthropist, and former prosecutor and Manhattan family court judge.
In past years, the judges narrowed the ballot to 25 semifinalists. This year, out of the 55 applications we received, the judges felt that so many deserved the opportunity to compete that we eliminated only 15 and we are putting the rest out for your votes. eSumry Elevator Pitch: We focus on litigation innovation.
It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. Which is probably a big part of the reason that many judges have been eager to distance themselves from it. Zeidenberg , 86 F.3d 3d 1447, 1454-55 (7th Cir.
Michael Sander , the founder of Docket Alarm , a product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case analytics, has left the company, seven months after its acquisition by legal research company vLex in April. Daniel Ivtsan vLex has named Daniel Ivtsan as the new head of product for Docket Alarm.
Developing friendships with attorneys, judges, and legal vendors through your state and local bar associations can be a productive way to have your own silent sales force, ready to send qualified candidates your way. Ask for Referrals : Referrals from satisfied clients can be a powerful way to attract new business.
billion 2,300 Commercial litigation and other corporate interests are primary areas of focus for this Chicago-based firm, founded in 1909, with nine major offices in the US. The top Big Law firms in the United States The following are some of the top Big Law firms in the US, reflecting a range of practice areas and geographical bases.
Judge Whyte’s ruling has been adopted in all circuits that have considered the issue. The Copyright Claims Board, an administrative court for resolving “small claims” in copyright law (less than $30,000), may yet prove to be useful; but so far, it has generated a lot of litigation “churn” without much in the way of substantive relief.
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectualproperty rights.
And that’s one thing, providing it a change control clause, which is proprietary, valuable intellectualproperty for that organization. And we have been sampling certain types of use cases, particularly around the search for relevance in litigation, and discovery. And in asking it to provide some analysis on that.
I could imagine what would come—what did come—with predictive analysis platforms like Lex Machina that could equip attorneys with data-driven insights extracted from historical legal records, facilitating informed decision-making throughout various stages of litigation.
For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. As a result, the rest of the copyright ecosystem has to live with the fallout from AWF’s seemingly reckless and irresponsible litigation strategy. 569 (1994).
And let alone that there’s a lot of risk in this these datasets, others HR risks, there’s intellectualproperty risks. So, It’s really interesting, what you’re saying now is, I talked to you, you may know, Jason Baron, you will see former director of litigation supports the White House in the National Archives.
And that’s one thing, providing it a change control clause, which is proprietary, valuable intellectualproperty for that organization. And we have been sampling certain types of use cases, particularly around the search for relevance in litigation, and discovery. And in asking it to provide some analysis on that.
Two prior blog posts on Bell’s litigation efforts: Fair Use Protects High Schools Use of Inspirational MemeBell v. This extraordinary assertion, with which Shakespeare, Tolstoy and Faulkner might take issue, [FN] frankly causes this court to wonder whether it is dealing with a litigant whose feet are firmly planted on the ground.
It even wrote me a funny Limerick about the Supreme Court: “ There once were nine judges supreme whose robes were a legal dream. We’ll explore the potential impacts of ChatGPT not only on everyday life, but also on the legal industry, education, intellectualproperty law, geopolitics, and more. Eric] 02:34 Welcome, Chris.
In litigation and intellectualproperty matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals.
Despite initial restrictions, like those imposed by US District Court judges and law schools like Berkeley and the University of Michigan, legal tech evangelist Nicole Black argues that these technologies should be embraced as valuable tools to streamline work and increase efficiencies.
And then I, then the second part I did litigation and employment. I enjoyed, you know, the kind of people problems, it had a litigation aspect, I liked the fact I ended up going to court quite a lot. And I liked them because we always have blind judging. So there are obviously different types of providers on the market.
The judge reiterated that Schrems II does not prohibit the use of US-based companies to process data within the EU, and while there remained a risk that data could still be accessed by the US intelligence services, this alone did not justify suspending the platform.
Many of these consequences involve the division of money and property. The Divorce center describes how various assets may be divided , from real estate and businesses to intellectualproperty. A patent owner can enforce their rights by pursuing patent infringement litigation. A private party can appeal their decisions.
On July 4, 2023, a federal judge declared FREEDOM from government censorship of Internet services. Shockingly, the judge ordered the executive branch to stop talking to Internet services about certain issues. The line between the productive and condemnable government engagement is murky and fluid. 3) Supreme Court dodges Section 230.
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents.
During the Jack Daniel’s oral argument , some of the Justices seemed wary of having judges or juries determine what is “art” or what uses of trademarks are “artistically relevant” in trademark disputes.
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. VoiceScript Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. Anything else?
She also has experience in civil litigation matters, including commercial and securities cases. He has experience in a wide range of complex commercial litigation matters, including securities fraud, antitrust, intellectualproperty, and product liability cases. Stanton of the U.S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content