This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Clio, in its online introduction of Britton, described Andreesen’s paper as a simple, thoughtful review of how AI and machinelearning might help humans. Britton has a similar optimism for AI and the legal world, from legal consumers to lawyers to judges to lawmakers.
Deepfakes use " deep learning ," a complex type of machinelearning, to create fake images, videos, and audio. In addition to inconsistencies you might see or hear, the background data attached to a digital file can reveal if it's been manipulated. Suspicious Metadata Here's where the experts come in.
AI is getting proficient at assisting various legal services such as contract management, legal predictions, eDiscovery, and sooner or later courtroom hearings. When AI takes the lead, MachineLearning strengthens its effectiveness. This does not stop here. AI may offer an outcome worth a million.
So this case is now finally headed towards its always-inevitable date with the Ninth Circuit. * * * Last year, the judge gutted most of the case. The latest ruling addresses YouTube’s motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint, which the court grants with prejudice.
In today’s episode, we’ll be diving into the fascinating world of one of the most advanced machinelearning tools out there: ChatGPT. It even wrote me a funny Limerick about the Supreme Court: “ There once were nine judges supreme whose robes were a legal dream. I’m your host, Eric Ahern.
The panelists included, Danielle Benecke, who is the founder and Global Head of machinelearning at Baker McKenzie, so large law firms are hiring people to lead up machinelearning within our law firms. So we’ve got a machine where we’re taking in new data, millions of documents a day. We’d love to hear from you.
And you hear a lot of hype. And I think we’re hearing that there’s probably not at least at this point in time, a Mark Noel 4:07 lot of folks haven’t done the math on some of these things. And, you know, you were kind of afraid that people wouldn’t, you know, judges lawyers wouldn’t accept it. And is there a cost savings?
How did your experience at Google shaped the development of deep judges AI models? Marlene Gebauer 11:59 So you have an impressive group of advisers, including former executives from recommened and Kira systems, how have they helped deep judges product development and go to market strategy? Is it in AI or machinelearning or both that?
There’s lots of talk about AI and machinelearning and how those tools will or will not impact the practice of law. They believe that machines will ultimately rule the human race. I recently had a chance to hear Richard Susskind speak on AI in law and, as always, found his comments perceptive and spot on.
And as we see improvements in algorithms, machinelearning algorithms, the cost of predicting legal outcomes is going to essentially vanish, it’s going to become very clear what would happen in court with respect to a particular situation in terms of the legal outcome. We’d love to hear from you. I want to that.
And obviously, now we’re looking to expand the team more and more, I think we’ve looked into hiring, you know, ml ops people, machinelearning engineers, software engineers, and it has produced already a tremendous amount of value for the firm. And the chance of that happening is low.
We’d love to hear your thoughts on what value you see in ChatGPT and GPT 3.5 Like they’re just these massive machines that folks can’t really wrangle, there are entire new startups built around. Machinelearning transparency, trying to give humans a way to view the models and get a bit of a better understanding of it.
On the other hand, I strongly believe in the combination of machines and humans, especially for these legal but also for medical applications. So it’s this combination of human and machine where the machine does too heavy lifting and a human decides whether something is relevant or not, whether it’s a false positive or false negative.
And you hear a lot of hype. And I think we’re hearing that there’s probably not at least at this point in time, a Mark Noel 4:07 lot of folks haven’t done the math on some of these things. And, you know, you were kind of afraid that people wouldn’t, you know, judges lawyers wouldn’t accept it. And is there a cost savings?
How did your experience at Google shaped the development of deep judges AI models? Marlene Gebauer 11:59 So you have an impressive group of advisers, including former executives from recommened and Kira systems, how have they helped deep judges product development and go to market strategy? Is it in AI or machinelearning or both that?
The panelists included, Danielle Benecke, who is the founder and Global Head of machinelearning at Baker McKenzie, so large law firms are hiring people to lead up machinelearning within our law firms. So we’ve got a machine where we’re taking in new data, millions of documents a day. We’d love to hear from you.
And obviously, now we’re looking to expand the team more and more, I think we’ve looked into hiring, you know, ml ops people, machinelearning engineers, software engineers, and it has produced already a tremendous amount of value for the firm. And the chance of that happening is low.
And as we see improvements in algorithms, machinelearning algorithms, the cost of predicting legal outcomes is going to essentially vanish, it’s going to become very clear what would happen in court with respect to a particular situation in terms of the legal outcome. We’d love to hear from you. I want to that.
Looking ahead, Riehl sees potential for Vincent AI to leverage external LLMs like Anthropic’s Claude model as well as their massive dataset of briefs and motions to generate tailored legal arguments statistically likely to persuade specific judges on particular issues. Here, you’ll see the exceptions and legal caveats.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. It’s a great failure of our judges, courts and legislatures that they’ve allowed — and continue to allow to this day — commercial entities to mingle their owned commentary with our official law.
Looking ahead, Riehl sees potential for Vincent AI to leverage external LLMs like Anthropic’s Claude model as well as their massive dataset of briefs and motions to generate tailored legal arguments statistically likely to persuade specific judges on particular issues. Here, you’ll see the exceptions and legal caveats.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. Note: The ballot was supposed to list 25 companies, but because of a tie in the initial round of voting by judges, 26 companies are listed.). In December, we issued a call for entries. Now your votes will select the final 15. FIND THE BALLOT HERE. .
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. BriefCatch Elevator Pitch: Empowers lawyers and judges to edit legal documents to the highest standards while helping their clients win, boosting their writing skills, and enjoying expert explanations, models, and examples.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. It’s a great failure of our judges, courts and legislatures that they’ve allowed — and continue to allow to this day — commercial entities to mingle their owned commentary with our official law.
So I did a bit of cleanup on them, as best I could, some of the voices in order to kind of remove enough of the background to hear them may sound a little off to the listeners. Greg Lambert 21:42 Yeah, that one was a little harder to hear. So let’s hear what Adam had to say. Yeah, FX LeDuc. Sorry about apologize. stopped ski.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. Note: The ballot was supposed to list 25 companies, but because of a tie in the initial round of voting by judges, 26 companies are listed.). In December, we issued a call for entries. Now your votes will select the final 15. FIND THE BALLOT HERE. .
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. Elevator Pitch: Empowers lawyers and judges to edit legal documents to the highest standards while helping their clients win, boosting their writing skills, and enjoying expert explanations, models, and examples.
So I did a bit of cleanup on them, as best I could, some of the voices in order to kind of remove enough of the background to hear them may sound a little off to the listeners. Greg Lambert 21:42 Yeah, that one was a little harder to hear. So let’s hear what Adam had to say. Yeah, FX LeDuc. Sorry about apologize. stopped ski.
Marathe argues judges and lawyers also need to be heavily educated on the latest developments in deep fake technology in order to counter their use in court. Are Judges, Juries and Lawyers Ready? Deep fakes are coming to a court, our judges and lawyers ready, where she delves into the implications on litigation.
Marathe argues judges and lawyers also need to be heavily educated on the latest developments in deep fake technology in order to counter their use in court. Are Judges, Juries and Lawyers Ready? Deep fakes are coming to a court, our judges and lawyers ready, where she delves into the implications on litigation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content