This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
When Can a Federal Court Hear a Case? There are two main situations in which a federal court might be able to hear a case. Otherwise, a state court will hear the case. The judge can rule in favor of one party or the other at this point because they dont need the help of the jury to apply the law. (A
At the 2024 Clio Cloud Conference , we sat down with Judge Victoria Pratt , a passionate advocate for criminal justice reform. But as Judge Pratt highlighted, its impact goes beyond convenience. AI in the legal arena Judge Pratt also touched on one of the biggest shifts in law: the rise of artificial intelligence. Her message?
The judge who struck down Elon Musk's compensation package is hearing it from the dumbest people on the planet. The post Elon Musk Supporters Bombard Judge With Angry Letters — She’s Not Even Opening Them appeared first on Above the Law.
Optimized Legal Audio is an artificial intelligence engine in its infancy that tries to hear what judges say, read the language they use, and through this to infer their relative preference for one attorney’s argument over another’s. The post Generating Predictions For <em>Grants Pass v.
The Awards also boasts 28 world-class judges and 10 award categories, including lifetime achievement. FOMO: You know you’re gonna regret it when you see the pictures and hear the stories of those who attended. Don’t miss out! This event will not be televised.
In an explosive exposé last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that 131 federal judges broke the law by hearing cases where they had a financial interest. To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases.
This resource covers topics such as the various types of agencies, the steps for making regulations, and the administrative hearing process. Formal rulemaking generally involves a hearing on the record, including the presentation of evidence. Informal rulemaking can proceed more efficiently because it does not involve a hearing.
Returning home with 15 episodes (linked below), it was our pleasure to interview the leadership, network news personalities, federal judges, ABA Medal winners, top presenters, singers , and more who participated in one of the legal profession’s largest gatherings. Judge Dana Marks, Judge Joan Churchill, and Karen T.
Hear highlights from this year’s gathering with special guests Beth Kaufman, Rick Gross and Harout Samra. Judge Carroll J. The Section Annual Conference features top litigation professionals from across the country discussing timely legal issues and the latest in trial work. How to Handle the Unexpected in Court.
However, a dog owner can contest the designation of their dog as dangerous at a hearing. This has meant that a judge likely will allocate a pet in a divorce to one spouse, although a recent trend has seen some judges awarding “shared custody” of a pet whom both spouses want.
Use Shorter Words Considering the frequency with which judges and lawyers review legal documents daily, try to prepare concise briefs and clearly communicate your arguments. As Adriana Linares points out, “Judges aren’t impressed with fancy words and jargon.
Procedural justice in the courtroom As criminal justice reform advocate Judge Victoria Pratt spoke of in her keynote at the 2024 Clio Cloud Conference , prioritizing dignity and respect for everyone is key to building a culture of trustand thats especially true in the courtroom. How is technology aiding the justice system?
Tune in to hear the touching story of an inspirational letter that went unanswered for decades. State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting 2019: ‘Get Paid and Have a Life’ with Judge Audrey Moorehead. Tune in to hear what citizens can do to reverse this trend. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. as the world’s reserve currency.
On November 22, 2023, the lawsuit against Lizzo by three of her previous backup dancers had its first court hearing. Continue reading → The post Behind the Bench: Unpacking Judge Epstein’s Inquiries in Lizzo Lawsuit Hearing first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
For clients concerned about issues of prejudice, unfairness, inconvenience, improper venue, or for cases requiring judges with special knowledge, a motion to transfer venue can be used to ensure a fair and comfortable legal process. Finally, you will represent your client at a hearing and address any objections or opposition to the motion.
Knowing what a motion hearing is and how to handle it is crucial for any lawyer. These hearings are where attorneys argue specific requests before a judge, and the outcomes can greatly influence a case. In this post, we dive into why these hearings matter and what lawyers need to know to navigate them successfully.
“Since then, one of my soap boxes that I try to advocate on all the time is that we need to see more lawyers in senior positions in leadership positions, in these amazing roles like partners and law school deans and professors and judges talking about the struggles they’ve faced and how they’ve gotten through it.” Hear the full episode:
Virtual court hearings are the subject of Episode 38. We talked to Magistrate Judge Tony Leung via Zoom about using Zoom videoconferences for court. Judge Leung sits on the bench for the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota and has a pretty impressive background.
In May 2023, a federal judge discovered fake cases cited in a filed brief. The subsequent sanctions hearing incited debates across the legal community. When questioned, the lawyer indicated he used ChatGPT to help with the research and drafting process and was “unaware its contents could be false.”
As to that last point, the court, in an opinion written by Presiding Judge Kurt S. In reviewing the memoranda, Judge Brian A. At a hearing on the motions to dismiss, the judge started out by informing plaintiff’s counsel of the fictitious cases he’d found and asking how they’d been included in the filings.
District Judge James Moody issued a permanent injunction against Arkansas’ law prohibiting gender-affirming care. The state is expected to appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, setting up a potential hearing in the US Supreme Court. See WaPo, Arkansas federal judge blocks first ban on gender-affirming care.
JAG Lawyer A Judge Advocate General is a unique opportunity for those who want to defend their country in court. Tony started his legal career in the Air Force Judge Advocate General Corps, and his career took him everywhere from Afghanistan to the law school classroom. and advising them to “take the bull by the horns.”
Pennsylvania judges have committed to have oral hearings on motions that might otherwise be decided on briefs–if a younger lawyer is involved is one way to do this. For example, I came across a standard Pretrial Order recently entered by Federal Magistrate Judge Gabriel Fuentes.
It was crazy enough to hear that lawyers were dumb enough to cite cases pulled from ChatGPT without ever reading them. From Larry Neumeister and the Associated Press: “Schwartz told Judge P. the Judge asked. Things only get wilder in the lawyers’ defense of sanctions. I did not comprehend that ChatGPT could fabricate cases.””
Obsidian Dynamics Transcript of Discovery Hearing Before Honorable Judith Hand, Magistrate Judge Appearances : On behalf of Plaintiff Genesis Technology Sarah Lovington Savath, Saine and Soore, LLP On behalf of Defendant Obsidian Dynamics Jeremy Putkin Mirkland and Mellis, LLP — The Court : Ms.
Sohail Mohammed—electrical engineer, New Jersey Superior Court Judge, court innovator and teacher. Irrespective of that answer, what has worked and what can work better in virtual and online dispute resolution Judge Mohammed on his take on these questions : The last three months have been the ride of a lifetime.
The balding, stern-faced judge stares down at me from his bench, framed by flags to either side of him, a judicial seal on the wall behind him. It is just the judge, the jury and me. The judge nods, but it looks like a nod of impatience, not of listening. Click another button, and I see myself from the perspective of the judge.
However, a court would almost never independently spot the standing problem at an ex parte TRO hearing. So the outcome in the most recent case exposes yet another reason to oppose the SAD Scheme, because plaintiffs could very well be overclaiming their copyright standing and judges are unlikely to realize this on their own.
Britton has a similar optimism for AI and the legal world, from legal consumers to lawyers to judges to lawmakers. With lawyers dissing the use of AI in writing and other areas of practice, it’ll be refreshing to hear Britton. Britton is an engaging speaker who combines insightful commentary with practical information.
This case got assigned to Judge Alsup’s courtroom. I previously summarized Judge Alsup’s modus operandi about motions to dismiss: Judge Alsup gives the benefit of the doubt to plaintiffs on motions to dismiss, only to hammer them on summary judgment if their evidence doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
The Illinois Supreme Court has officially found that operational challenges in Illinois circuit courts will necessitate remote pretrial hearings to comply with the pretrial release provisions of the SAFE-T Act, according to an Order issued in late August. Read the order here.
So but I hear we have another Schwartz. Then I’m sure the judge is saying sorry, doesn’t cut it. So that was terrifying to honestly, to walk into that final hearing, you get sort of like one shot. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it. Basically, if we lost they would be sent back to Honduras and likely murdered. Like, I want it.
Yes, we will continue to utilize remote appearances, especially in hearings, bench trials, and for cost-savings and convenience when expert witnesses are required to travel cross-country and spend a week or so in a nice hotel. District Judge Jed S. The short and simple answer is yes and no. Clients simply can't justify that.
In other words, the court could have–AND SHOULD HAVE–called out these issues during the ex parte TRO hearing. The judge doesn’t issue a mea culpa for her avoidable mistake or excoriate Viral DRM for getting an undeserved TRO. Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme Cases–Viral DRM v. Emoji GmbH v.
Judge Kevin Castel called the hearing for the parties to show cause as to why he should not issue sanctions. He deferred decision, saying he would issue a written ruling at a later time.
For inspiration, laughs, and sober advice, I recommend the following playlist explaining #FreeBritney and covering the WALL-E of legal tech, surly judges, and SCOTUS poetry. When you hear artificial intelligence and you think “Black Mirror,” “The Matrix,” or the supervillain Ultron, Jared Correa says to relax.
In an unprecedented move, Broward County Circuit Court Judge Andrew Siegel recently used virtual reality (VR) technology during a stand-your-ground hearing. By immersing himself in the VR simulation, the judge was able to view the crime scene from the defendants point of view, offering a unique perspective on the incident.
Pennsylvania judges have committed to have oral hearings on motions that might otherwise be decided on briefs–if a younger lawyer is involved is one way to do this. For example, I came across a standard Pretrial Order recently entered by Federal Magistrate Judge Gabriel Fuentes.
During the appearance before a panel of judges at the U.S. The court hearing is the latest development in a lengthy saga over the fate of an app that is widely popular, especially among young Americans, but that many politicians in Washington fear poses or is a security risk. TikTok headed to court on Sept.
Work Activity Levels – Legal Job Family Work Activities Lawyer Judicial Law Clerks Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates Paralegals and Legal Assistants Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers Getting Information 5.92
Our Commissioner Spotlights highlight the judges, lawyers, and educators from across Illinois who serve as our Commissioners. This Commissioner Spotlight highlights a remarkable woman, Judge Alicia N. This Commissioner Spotlight highlights a remarkable woman, Judge Alicia N. Why did you want to become a judge?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content