This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I spent a bit of time in private practice as a therapist and then came back to the courts to serve as a project manager for our Domestic Violence Coordinated Court. While in college and grad school, I would have never thought in a million years I would have ended up in a court management role, but I absolutely love it.
As lawyers, law students, and other legal professionals begin to explore regulatory reform issues, they will likely hear several common arguments put forth by opponents. Some lawyers are for it, some lawyers are against it, and many lawyers are completely unaware of the conversation altogether (and thus have yet to participate in it).
Following the dissolution of our subcommittee and hearing about the establishment of the Access to Justice Committee, JFAP proactively contacted the North Carolina State Bar in July 2022 to inquire about the new committee’s objectives and our potential contribution.
Nonmarital Fathers in FamilyCourt: Judges’ and Lawyers’ Perspectives 99 Washington Univ. The findings are drawn from original empirical data generated in a rigorous and extensive five-year qualitative study investigating the experiences of low-income litigants in familycourt. constitutional law.
Elevator pitch: Since 2017, Immediation has been pioneering improved access to justice via highly secure digital legal environments for dispute resolution, hearings, arbitrations and mediation – saving time and money and leading to greater sustainability. We offer managed hearing services. Headquarters: Ventura, Calif.,
Elevator pitch: Since 2017, Immediation has been pioneering improved access to justice via highly secure digital legal environments for dispute resolution, hearings, arbitrations and mediation – saving time and money and leading to greater sustainability. We offer managed hearing services. Headquarters: Ventura, Calif.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content