This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
is one of the first major class-action lawsuits to dive into questions of online collection of “public data” and generative AI training data sets. Also, ignoring copyright licenses is at least arguably copyright infringement, and your fair use claim probably won’t get you out of the lawsuit at the motion to dismiss stage. GitHub, Inc.
“Cruise”ing for “Waymo” Lawsuits: Liability in Autonomous Vehicle Crashes By Caroline Kropka On October 2, 2023, a driverless vehicle traveled down a San Francisco street. [1] 10] When a human driver is no longer at the wheel to make mistakes, the fault may rest with the programmers of the vehicle’s software. [11]
In general, we can classify the costs into two categories: Direct financial losses can result from fraudulent charges and fees, lost sales due to downtime, and the cost of repairing or replacing hardware and software. It can also lead to legal consequences and irreparable damage to a business’s reputation.
Fortunately, there are a number of software programs designed specifically for legal practice data management. Read Also – Advantages of a Cloud-based Legal Document Management Software What is data management? Todays best data management software ensures that dependable, updated data is always used to make decisions.
Fortunately, there are a number of software programs designed specifically for legal practice data management. Read Also – Advantages of a Cloud-based Legal Document Management Software What is data management? Today’s best data management software ensures that dependable, updated data is always used to make decisions.
But failure to comply with PCI standards can lead to unwanted consequences like reputation damage, loss of clients, and lawyers and firms can also face potential fines. While technology and digitalization offer convenience and efficiency, they also come with legal compliance responsibilities. Why Is PCI Compliance Crucial For Law Firms?
Since the implementation of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) 18 months ago, more than 75 lawsuits have been filed seeking damages using the Act’s private cause of action. The CCPA provides a cause of action to “[a]ny consumer whose nonencrypted and nonredacted personal information.
In this motion, the case gets dismissed on the grounds like an improper venue or failure to state claims. Motion for Summary Judgment A motion for summary judgment is a legal request that one party makes in a lawsuit. Legal motion management is an essential aspect of the litigation process.
Oracle software case. (See [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. This post is 11,000+ words long, so you may want to block out some time to enjoy this properly.] By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa By a 7-2 vote, the U.S. 569 (1994).
The plaintiffs asserted products liability and related claims against Snap, on the premise that Snap “is an inherently dangerous software product that Defendants deceptively advertise and promote in a way that facilitates sex crimes against children.” To get around Section 230, the plaintiffs attempted the Lemmon v.
Even though the legal system punished the wrongdoers, the lawsuits continue. The harm Doe alleges does not flow solely from the product software. Doe sued Grindr for strict products liability, negligence, and FOSTA. The court holds that Section 230 applies to the claims. ICS Provider. The plaintiff didn’t challenge this factor.
The complaint was brought under the FCA’s qui tam provisions, whereby a private citizen can bring a lawsuit on behalf of the government. The underlying failures alleged in the settlement occurred between 2018 and 2023. The settlement also underscores the need to provide a channel for personnel to escalate perceived compliance failures.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content