This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The court summarizes: “Meta claims that it raised issues with Plaintiffs, including “nominative fair use,” “commentary,” and “the un-likelihood of confusion based on the appearance of the marks in the actual marketplace, as they will be encountered by consumers.””
Managing a law firm requires more than overseeing cases and delegating tasksit demands a strategic approach that balances client expectations, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency. This law firm management guide examines key strategies and tools that drive efficiency, enhance client satisfaction, and support sustainable growth.
Another 3k+ word post about the jurisprudential chaos in online contract formation law. Two top-line takeaways you might get from this post: A two-click formation process avoids the risk of judges moving the goalposts about formation, and If you are amending your TOS, have an airtight plan for building a credible evidentiary record.
All your interactions with these virtual home assistant devices are recorded, and the recordings are likely being reviewed by a company employee and fed back into their system to improve the AI central to the device’s functioning. But danger lurks behind certain tech when working from home. SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES.
Cloud accounting software can be a valuable tool for law firms, providing a way to manage finances and track performance. In addition, cloud accounting software can help law firms to stay compliant with regulatory requirements by providing easy access to financial records. Read Also – How safe is the cloud for law firms?
Cloud accounting software can be a valuable tool for law firms, providing a way to manage finances and track performance. In addition, cloud accounting software can help law firms to stay compliant with regulatory requirements by providing easy access to financial records. Read Also – How safe is the cloud for law firms?
By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Koerner Endowed Professor of Law, Tulane University Law School [See part 1 about defendant opt-outs and part 2 about defendant defaults.] Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down. Let’s take a look.
The DPA investigated the transfers following press reports, and found that the company had breached the GDPR by: Not having an appropriate data processing agreement in place; Failing to perform a risk assessment for the engagement; and Not having a lawful basis for transferring personal data outside the EEA to China ( e.
Consent for use of personal data: The German competition regulator used national competition laws to extend the Digital Market Act’s user consent requirements to additional Google services offered within Germany. Data Privacy Framework: EU businesses intending to take advantage of the EU-U.S. providers, notwithstanding the framework.
Route responds that CRFA does not apply to commercial solicitations and that the non-disparagement agreement is not subject to common-law defamation requirements. Further, the disparagement agreement is not limited by common-law defamation requirements. * Thi E-Commerce, LLC, 2023 WL 5949029 (Cal. Lulifama.com LLC, 2023 U.S.
To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s case law concerning the fair-use doctrine. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. Goldsmith , No. 21-869 (May 18, 2023). 569 (1994).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content