Remove Due diligence Remove e-discovery Remove Lawsuit
article thumbnail

Exploring the Future of Legal Innovation at The Masters Conference: Thought Leadership in D.C. and Social Media in Discovery and Investigations

CloudNine

The reticence on the face of many in the room underscored the power of this tool in the hands of e-discovery professionals. In one powerful case example shared, a claimant in a workplace injury lawsuit posted photos of themselves competing in a dance competitionat a time they were allegedly too injured to work.

article thumbnail

Top 7 Legal Contract Review Software Tools of 2025

Percipient

Reduce the Risk of Costly Mistakes One missed clause can lead to financial losses, compliance issues, or even lawsuits. Schedule your discovery call today! Seamless integrations : Works with e-signature tools, document management systems, and more. No pressure, right?

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Everything You Should Know About AI Legal Tech

Percipient

E-Discovery E-discovery focuses on finding and organizing digital information for legal cases. Theyre especially helpful for lawsuits or investigations that involve large amounts of information. It helps with contract analysis, legal research, e-discovery, and compliance monitoring.

article thumbnail

Legal Innovation and AI: Risks and Opportunities

Clio

Automation and artificial intelligence in the legal sector AI is already used for contract review and due diligence, such as identifying inconsistencies and potential risks in a contract. Ethical implications of AI and machine learning in legal practice Lawsuits and legal decisions have life-altering consequences for clients.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Fixes One Problem with the Copyright Statute of Limitations, But Punts Another — Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.”

Court 105