This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Called Litigation Footprint, it provides a visual overview of the federal and state courts across the country in which a party has litigated, derived from the litigation histories of parties in over 27 million cases filed in 94 federal district courts and over 1,300 state courts in 34 states and the District of Columbia.
The company provides AI-powered tools to help litigators automate repetitive tasks and work more efficiently. Suh provides background on founding LegalMation about seven years ago to help streamline the “scut work” litigation associates spend time on. Let’s jump into this week’s episode with a couple of great guests from LegalMation.
Ai.Law Ai.Law provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. Henchman automatically centralizes past clauses and definitions from any legal team’s contract database and delivers them intelligently in lawyers’ familiar Microsoft Word or Outlook environments. Beagle slashes these costs by 3x.
The Definitive Guide to Slack for Litigators Slack provides chat software for business. Is it a good choice for litigators? The company's tagline is "Be Less Busy." Read the Article here
The Definitive Guide to Slack for Litigators Slack provides chat software for business. Is it a good choice for litigators? The company's tagline is "Be Less Busy." Read the Article here
This triple-layered, vacuum-insulated beauty keeps drinks cold for 36 hours or hot for 18, which is basically longer than their average workday (and definitely longer than that deposition they won’t stop complaining about). S’well Stainless Watter Bottle Even the sharpest legal mind needs to stay hydrated!
Last and definitely not least, we had the opportunity to catch up with my legal hero Erwin Chemerinsky, the Dean of Berkeley Law, as we discussed his topic presented at the Alexander F. If you own rental property, you should definitely tune in. CLA 2019 Annual Meeting: Litigation Section–CLE Highlights and Section Updates.
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. Looking ahead, Schafer expects to expand ClearBrief’s features to assist paralegals along with corporate attorneys beyond litigation. But you know, as litigators, we are in Word. It’s good to have you here.
Examples of AI generated evidence could include: In a securities litigation, an AI system analyzes stock trading patterns over the last ten years to demonstrate the relative magnitude of the stock drop as a percentage of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or to assess how likely it is that the drop in price was caused by a particular event.
While I do have a vested interest in the case going to trial, I can certainly understand any reluctance on the part of a litigant or counsel, given the incredibly high level of stress and risk involved. Another recent Litigation-Tech award! Litigation is definitely not a 9-5 job. Many times. Perhaps too many times.
Defining AI for Internal Policies A Few Considerations and Tips (July 29, 2024) Companies developing internal AI policies often face challenges deciding how to define AI and, relatedly, deciding when AI governance and compliance programs should apply to models outside their chosen definition.
While the decision today doesn’t definitively resolve the future of the Florida and Texas laws, a majority bloc of justices–led by Justice Kagan–articulated some important principles that represent a major victory for the First Amendment freedoms of social media services.
The court summarizes its legal standard: “where a statutes gateway coverage definition divides the universe into covered and uncovered business based on the type of content they publish, those statutes are content-based and subject to strict scrutiny.” ” EVERY SEGREGATE-AND-SUPPRESS LAW DOES THIS BY DEFINITION.
I can’t easily track the state court litigation, but the federal litigation is a sight to behold. Because it was underdeveloped, the court tells the plaintiffs to try that theory again before the court will definitively rule on it. However, life intervened, and my massive blog post got stuck in draft mode.
Eastern time today, TR said it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Casetext for $650 million cash. Rumors had been swirling that Thomson Reuters was about to acquire Casetext, and they proved to be true. Just before 9 p.m.
There is definitely demand for the AI Insider Program with over 3,000 law firms already signed up. He also sees opportunities to use the tools to help pro se litigants and courts. Jeff Pfeifer 16:06 Definitely. Pfeifer emphasizes LexisNexis’ focus on responsible AI.
In this blog, we will delve into the distinctions between a lawyer, attorney, and litigator. What is a Litigator? While all litigators are lawyers, not all lawyers are litigators. A litigator is a specialized type of lawyer who focuses on representing clients in court proceedings.
Also, the definition of “malware” itself includes vague terms, like “disruptive” and “damaging”–and an “etc.” Based on the fundamental illogic of its litigation position, I see no way for Enigma to win here. ” NOT HELPFUL. We should not presume that we are.”
LeadClick decision , which said: “Courts typically have held that internet service providers, website exchange systems , online message boards, and search engines fall within this definition.” ” This is the kind of argument only a pro se litigant would make in 2023. Third-Party Content. Case citation : McCall v.
Ryanair recently “prevailed” in its CFAA claim in its litigation against Booking.com. Not only that, but this case makes it more likely that other plaintiffs and defendants will suffer lengthy, protracted litigation to reach similarly absurd conclusions. Here, there was no loss that meets that definition. Booking Holdings Inc.
Legal assistants, also called litigation assistants, mainly perform ancillary work and work at the strategic and administrative levels to support the legal profession. Moreover, the American Bar Association (ABA) still only changed the definition of paralegal, which specifies that one cannot use the term legal assistant in 2020.
Now, Law.com Radar is taking its algorithm even further with the unveiling of a live-beta feature, Trend Detection , that identifies trends and patterns in the ocean of federal court litigation data, revealing where cases are surging or ebbing as they impact particular practice areas, industries, or even a single client.
Key Insights: Definition and Context: Koehler began by defining linked files as paths or URLs in documents that point to other files stored on various platforms. Preserving Linked Files: Taking “snapshots” of data at the time of a litigation hold can help maintain document versions as they were during the relevant period.
The discovery process is a critical element of litigation, and objections to discovery requests are every bit as essential. Any legal professional working in litigation needs to know how to make these objections, and how to respond when the opposing side makes them. This is why a cheat sheet for discovery objections can be valuable.
Hammering away at the problem with the same tools is Einstein’s definition of insanity, he said. Prior to becoming a judge, he was in private practice, focused on complex civil litigation. “We cannot volunteer ourselves across the access-to-justice gap,” Himonas said in that statement. It hasn’t worked.”.
The “personal information” definition is amended. The current definition of personal information requires the information to be “about” an individual who is either identified or reasonably identifiable. So, what “agreed in principle” proposals are worth paying attention to? Overarching proportionality requirement.
This week we have Damien Riehl , VP, Litigation Workflow and Analytics Content at FastCase, and one of the drivers behind SALI (Standards Advancement for for the Legal Industry.) Damien is definitely a “big thinker” when it comes to the benefits of creating and using standards for the legal industry. And then I litigate the patent.
Due to the high risk of data re-identification, we might expect litigation against companies innovating in the healthcare realm to be common. Entities whose primary business is not related to healthcare are not included within either of the definitions. However, besides Dinerstein , this space has not seen many other lawsuits.
In her current role, Katie focuses on leveraging technology like AI to improve the litigation process for lawyers. Their product suite now covers the entire litigation lifecycle, from intake to discovery to case management. The hosts also introduced Kristin Zmrhal, who has over 20 years of experience in the legal tech space.
I’m sure ShutterStock would have written a $2,131 settlement check to avoid the litigation. The court responds that image metadata isn’t subject to the broad industry consensus required by the statutory definition. Is the attorneys’ fee shift motivating some or all of this lawsuit? ShutterStock. Stored at a User’s Direction.
The challenge was to analyze single plaintiff employment litigation cases to determine how these types of matters should be priced. No definition of scope and no work plan equals useless budgets, leaving no way to manage to a budget or to identify scope changes. I remember the first time I was assigned this task.
Due to the high risk of data re-identification, we might expect litigation against companies innovating in the healthcare realm to be common. Entities whose primary business is not related to healthcare are not included within either of the definitions. However, besides Dinerstein, this space has not seen many other lawsuits.
While taking ownership of your own career growth is not a panacea, it can definitely lead to more possibilities for fulfillment. If you’re a budding litigator, your list may include taking a plaintiff’s deposition or cross-examining an expert witness. Find a Good Mentor.
The plaintiffs lost al of the framing cases then, but here we are in 2024, still litigating framing cases. Once we qualify the copies as “electronic,” it becomes unmistakable that this case deals with intangible items, not traditional “chattel” that are, by definition, tangible items. ” That’s true.
For unclear reasons, Kelly Toys expanded the litigation to add online marketplaces Alibaba and AliExpress as defendants. Normally, SAD Scheme rightsowners don’t sue online marketplaces because that brings in well-funded and highly motivated defendants who will jack up the litigation costs substantially. This is an unusual move.
. “Websites such as Facebook that facilitate the connection of countless online users to a common database and servers indeed qualify as interactive computer services… There is no serious question that Facebook fits this statutory definition.” Either way, looping Facebo0k into this litigation was a terrible decision.
Many companies are leveraging international firms for regulatory, litigation, IP, and other legal needs outside the U.S. Yeah, that’s Kristina Satkunas 4:20 it’s a, it’s definitely two different questions. So there are there are definite trade offs to having this strategy in place. I’ve been in legal for a long time.
LawHelp Interactive to help self-represented litigants obtain essential legal forms. So this is definitely a way to accelerate our network and make sure that we’re connecting as many lawyers and legal services organizations, and vice versa, as possible.” LawHelp.org, a network of statewide legal portals.
With the goals of automating the litigation process from response to appeal, Walter and Albeiro are focused on removing the mundane tasks, such as typing, from the process and allowing the attorneys to focus more on their legal experience and expertise over the grunt work that takes up too much of their time already.
My litigation partner will read the draft of an email out loud three or four times before sending it. Avoid phrases such as “I feel” or “I think,” which sound less definitive. This should go without saying, but the last tip in Nancy’s talk was to proofread your emails before they go out. NH: Focus on the facts.
The company provides AI-powered tools to help litigators automate repetitive tasks and work more efficiently. Suh provides background on founding LegalMation about seven years ago to help streamline the “scut work” litigation associates spend time on. Let’s jump into this week’s episode with a couple of great guests from LegalMation.
Warby Parker, part of 1-8oo Contacts’ irrepressible efforts to revive the litigation genre. I hope this ruling will be persuasive to other courts so that we can finally and permanently put this chapter to rest after 2+ decades of pointless litigation. the dollar value of the clicks at issue is well below the costs of litigation).
Nonetheless, the majority opinion will have significant practical implications for transnational litigation in all IP areas. As noted by one transnational litigation scholar , this test would have “made the place of the conduct producing the evil, rather than the place of the transaction, determinative.” Yes, and no.
Your firm is probably the biggest asset and definitely the biggest wealth creator you have in your life. As a corporate litigator. And there is often another partner who wants to distribute all the profit. Neither is wrong — the answer is somewhere in the middle. Filling the War Chest.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content