This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Supreme Court unanimously agreed to send the cases back to the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits for more careful review of the plaintiffs’ facial challenges to the laws. Challenges to those laws will fill the courts’ dockets, and some of those cases will reach the Supreme Court before it finally resolves the Florida and Texas laws.
Once we qualify the copies as “electronic,” it becomes unmistakable that this case deals with intangible items, not traditional “chattel” that are, by definition, tangible items. California law requires that the property interest be “well-defined” and “like staking a claim to a plot of land at the title office.”
This is another lawsuit involving the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs. (Q: In this lawsuit, BAYC sued an “appropriation artist,” Ripps, who sought to comment on anti-Semitic aspects of the BAYC NFTs. Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v.
If you’re new to FOSTA cases and you are baffled by the layers of inferences and arguments here, you are definitely not alone. However, FOSTA was not designed as an anti-CSAM law, so the plaintiffs’ claims don’t really fit the legal doctrine. Craigslist * Sex Trafficking Lawsuit Against Craigslist Moves Forward–ML v.
By definition, Snap’s failure to remove CSAM distributed on Snapchat by third parties, and Apple’s and Google’s choice to allow Snapchat to remain available for download in their online stores, involve “reviewing. Marriott * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–GG v. US * Catching Up on a FOSTA Case–ML v.
” Given this court believes the issue is definitively resolved, I’m sure plaintiffs will stop making the 1591/1595 argument. Marriott * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–GG v. Craigslist * Facebook Loses Jurisdictional Ruling in Texas Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Facebook v. Reddit, Inc. ,
We spotted that SB 34 actually prohibits this kind of sharing and we brought a lawsuit last year against the Marin County Sheriff alleging that they violated this law because they were sharing with hundreds of out of state agencies, they were sharing the locations of drivers that they were collecting throughout Marin County.
9, 2024) The lawsuit alleges Meta addicts teens and thus violates DC’s consumer protection act. ” State v. July 29, 2024) Similar to the DC case, the lawsuit alleges Meta addicts teens and thus violates Vermont’s consumer protection act. District of Columbia v. Meta Platforms, Inc., LEXIS 27 (D.C. Superior Ct.
Isha Marathe 10:45 So um, I think that, you know, we’ve seen, we’ve seen too, as of late May, in terms of where a party said that are claimed that the evidence that was presented was a deep fake, and one was in a Tesla lawsuit involving an image of Elon Musk.
Isha Marathe 10:45 So um, I think that, you know, we’ve seen, we’ve seen too, as of late May, in terms of where a party said that are claimed that the evidence that was presented was a deep fake, and one was in a Tesla lawsuit involving an image of Elon Musk.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content