Remove Definition Remove Failure-to-appear Remove State law
article thumbnail

Surprise! Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Bored Ape Yacht Club v. Ripps

Eric Goldman

The court says those aren’t DMCA takedown notices by definition, because they didn’t assert any copyright interests; so they are outside 512(f)’s scope. I’ve documented dozens of ways that 512(f) claims have failed, so the failure of this claim isn’t surprising.

Court 103
article thumbnail

Banking Agencies Propose 36-Hour Data Breach Reporting Rules for Significant Incidents

Debevoise Data Blog

A 36-hour deadline appears to be one of the most rigorous timeframes of any U.S. Background Banking organizations already are subject to reporting obligations of cyber events and data breaches under applicable federal and state laws. breach reporting scheme.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Immunizes Snap, Even if It’s “Inherently Dangerous”–L.W. v. Snap

Eric Goldman

” This does not persuade the judge: the Court must treat Defendants as publishers or speakers, regardless of how their claims are framed, because their theories of liability plainly turn on Defendants’ alleged failure to monitor and remove third-party content. To get around Section 230, the plaintiffs attempted the Lemmon v.

article thumbnail

Five Decisions Illustrate How Section 230 Is Fading Fast

Eric Goldman

” The court distinguishes a long list of precedents that it says don’t apply because they “involved state action that interfered with messaging or other expressive conduct—a critical element that is not present in the case before this court.”

Court 93