This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This is thematically aligned with the OECDs AI definition, which has been adopted by most other AI laws. South Korea has become the latest country to pass a national AI law. It also imposes new duties on South Koreas executive branch to oversee and set standards for AI deployment and development. Basic Acts Scope: Who Has to Comply?
They see problems in the world and want to do something about it, which is the true definition of compassion. Anxiety and depression come into play when lawyers begin perceiving this reality as failure — because failure is unacceptable to many lawyers. Lawyers Often Wonder Why They Are Susceptible to Depression. Compassion.
For unexplained reasons, it does not appear that the defendants are invoking the 512 defense. Kiwi Farms, operated by Joshua Moon, is best known for coordinating cyberattacks on individuals , especially people with disabilities. CloudFlare’s block ). ” Greer emailed Moon asking to remove the book. Direct Infringement.
For the Fourth of July week, we thought we’d do something fun and probably a little weird. Greg spoke with an AI guest named Justis for this episode. Justis, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4, was able to have a natural conversation with Greg and provide insightful perspectives on the use of generative AI in the legal industry, specifically in law firms.
The world “startup” often pops up in everyday conversation, but a precise definition is hard to come by. Startups have a high rate of failure, which means many of them close up shop within the first few years. A small law firm can be a challenging entrepreneurial endeavor. What’s the History of Startups?
The world “startup” often pops up in everyday conversation, but a precise definition is hard to come by. Startups have a high rate of failure, which means many of them close up shop within the first few years. A small law firm can be a challenging entrepreneurial endeavor. What’s the History of Startups?
Google cases (as well as decisions in the Warhol copyright fair use case and the Amgen patent enablement case). Twitter won its decision unanimously, and the Supreme Court per curiam punted the Google case back to the 9th Circuit with the clear message that the plaintiffs should lose. Twitter, Inc. Taamneh , No.
The court says those aren’t DMCA takedown notices by definition, because they didn’t assert any copyright interests; so they are outside 512(f)’s scope. I’ve documented dozens of ways that 512(f) claims have failed, so the failure of this claim isn’t surprising.
The court is engaging in a standard analysis of technological definitions, which frequently age poorly as the technology evolves. [This is one of those opinions that is a slog to blog because the court’s statutory analysis made my head hurt. If this opinion confuses you, welcome to the club. ” [Note 1: I HATE getting voicemails.
The age estimation and privacy provisions thus appear likely to impede the “availability and use” of information and accordingly to regulate speech.” [Sorry it’s take me this long to get this blog post off my desk. I hope it was worth the wait.] their website).
The categorization of social media accounts into “business” and “personal” accounts was a hot issue a decade ago, when states across the country passed laws to protect employees from invasive employer demands to access or control their personal social media accounts. The court doesn’t endorse this test.
Failure to comply with the HBNR can result in penalties of up to $51,744 per violation. While this language may appear exceedingly broad at first glance, certain definitions limit the scope of the HBNR to businesses whose services involve offering or maintaining (e.g., fertility, fitness, glucose levels, heart rate).
GitHub, Inc. is one of the first major class-action lawsuits to dive into questions of online collection of “public data” and generative AI training data sets. On May 11th, the court ruled on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss , granting in part and denying in part. The court also held that plaintiffs were permitted to proceed pseudonymously.
A 36-hour deadline appears to be one of the most rigorous timeframes of any U.S. The Proposed Rule would impose prompt reporting requirements on banking organizations and their service providers with respect to certain data breaches and other cyber events. breach reporting scheme.
Personal data definition Pseudonymised data is only personal data if it can be re-identified using reasonable means, i.e. a person is “reasonably likely to use” (time, cost and effort involved, technology and resources available to the person). What are the main proposed changes? The UK government wishes to maintain data adequacy with the EU.
Has the senior partner stopped introducing you to new clients? Have you been assigned a “special project” or more work than you can handle? Falling out of favor is a tough blow to the ego, but it doesn’t have to ruin your career. Does this sound familiar? You have arrived. But, after a while, something changes.
August 9, 2023) This case involves StubHub’s obligations to provide refunds due to COVID cancellations. The district court said that the buyers who made their purchases on the website had to go to arbitration, but the buyers who made their purchases on their mobile devices could stay in court. Citing Sellers v. The court sees it differently.
As I’ve previously written, for many years after the DMCA passed, everyone assumed that 17 USC 512(a) completely shielded Internet access providers from liability for subscribers’ copyright infringements. If 512(a) provided full immunity, the Copyright Alert System was unnecessary and pernicious to both IAPs and their subscribers.
This opinion is a companion to the Massachusetts Supreme Court’s decision in Good v. Uber , which upheld an identical TOS formation process. The highest New York state court agrees. Consistent with this principle, courts have examined whether the offeree of a web-based contract was put on inquiry notice of the contractual terms. .”
The Revised Amendment narrows the definition of a Class A company by adding that, “when calculating the number of employees and gross annual revenue, affiliates shall include only those that share information systems, cybersecurity resources or all or any part of a cybersecurity program with the covered entity.”
(For this reason, for a while there was a risk that the European Parliament would include in the proposed Markets in Crypto-assets Regulation a ban on the use of consensus based on PoW.) StaaS providers offer this service to numerous participants, and this greatly increases the pool of tokens they can present to the network as their stake.
Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down. Mitrakos, 22-CCB-0035 , February 15, 2023, and Oppenheimer v. Prutton, 22-CCB-0045 , February 28, 2023. Step Two: The CCB does a compliance review of the filed claim to determine if the claim qualifies for the CCB. Let’s take a look.
Throughout the amendment process, the Department was resolute in promulgating a set of standards for larger companies rather than deferring to those companies to make all risk-based decision-making. April 15, 2024: 500.17(b): b): Certification requirements. April 29, 2024: 500.9: Risk assessments requirements; 500.3: May 1, 2025: 500.5(a)(2):
And law firms that resist the impetus for change will risk failure. Businesses around the world continue to feel the pandemic’s impact in countless ways. Similarly, many private clients struggle to overcome hurdles related to limited access to technology or lack of funds. Times of crisis and uncertainty always present opportunity.
Lately it seems like every legal new source is releasing whitepapers and webinars on topics like “How To Do More With Less?”, “Use Data to Drive Business Decisions”, “Improve Your Contracting Process”, and “Minimize Your Outside Counsel Spend”. Legal professionals are inundated with emails and overwhelmed.
Together with the California Attorney General’s prior enforcement examples , these enforcement examples shed light on how the California Attorney General views the definition of a “sale” under the CCPA, and suggest compliance steps that businesses might consider undertaking to mitigate enforcement risks.
According to the US legal system, a frivolous lawsuit is by definition a legal claim with no facts or basis to support it, filed by an entity or individual who is well aware that it has no legal merit. Usually these types of claims are filed specifically for strategic reasons, and often even, dare we say— absurd. for everyone involved.
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. This post is 11,000+ words long, so you may want to block out some time to enjoy this properly.] By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa By a 7-2 vote, the U.S. Goldsmith , No. 21-869 (May 18, 2023).
I can’t see what’s happening in state court, but I have no reason to believe that it’s any less contentious. The cases reached important milestones last Fall, when both the federal and state court judges denied the social media defendants’ Section 230 motions to dismiss. However, this is not the final word in the matter.
There is no single definition for “dark patterns,” but the term generally refers to user interfaces ( e.g. , websites, apps) that are designed to manipulate a user’s behavior and subvert a consumer’s choices, causing the user to engage in conduct that they did not expect or desire, or impairing individuals’ ability to make an informed decision.
Definition of Buy-Side Contracts In simple words, buy-side contracts are agreements that define the receipt of goods or services in exchange for something in return, typically money. Your company’s performance can be defined by how well you sell and how you buy. New to contracting?
Key takeaways from October include: Employee monitoring: Following new guidance issued by the UK ICO, employers may want to review their existing employee monitoring to ensure it meets the regulator’s latest expectations, including ensuring that any monitoring is necessary, proportionate, and conducted transparently.
On November 9, 2022, the New York Department of Financial Services (the “NYDFS”) announced the publication of the official proposed amendments to its 2017 Cybersecurity Regulation 23 NYCRR 500 (the “Proposed Amendments”). The 60-day public comment period to the Proposed Amendments ends on January 9, 2023. respectively).
For the Fourth of July week, we thought we’d do something fun and probably a little weird. Greg spoke with an AI guest named Justis for this episode. Justis, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4, was able to have a natural conversation with Greg and provide insightful perspectives on the use of generative AI in the legal industry, specifically in law firms.
Twitter LinkedIn Reddit Facebook Pinterest Print Email We sat down with Anthony Seale , CEO and Founder of Legatics, and Daniel Grant-Smith , Head of Engagement at Legatics to dive into their two fascinating Innovate UK reports. We dive into these challenges and opportunities below. Anthony and Daniel, thanks for joining us! That’s where we fit in.
” This does not persuade the judge: the Court must treat Defendants as publishers or speakers, regardless of how their claims are framed, because their theories of liability plainly turn on Defendants’ alleged failure to monitor and remove third-party content. To get around Section 230, the plaintiffs attempted the Lemmon v.
Comments from around the business community emphasize two primary adverse consequences of an overly broad definition of “covered entities.” Candidate, 2026 On March 15, 2022, President Biden signed the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (CIRCIA) into law. Second, the U.S.
The bills, which largely focus on critical infrastructure, appear to be coalescing around three key concepts: Expanding the Role of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”). Clarifying Who Falls Under the Definition of “Critical Infrastructure”. Establishing a Mandatory Breach Reporting Requirement.
By Rick Clark The Masters Conference for Legal Professionals in New York City hosted by Morgan Lewis LLP on July 24th was replete with insights on applying AI to eDiscovery, collecting and reviewing text and chat app data and information governance. This approach helps to tell the whole story while saving time and reducing costs.
Given the breadth of this definition, a wide variety of automated tools will likely be covered by this law, even if they do not employ true AI, including many game-based tests and some resume review tools and automated personality assessments. leverage predictive algorithms to support hiring. What Does the AEDT Require?
Protecting Patent Rights: Failure to disclose inventions to the public, which is prevented by NDAs, can revoke patent rights. Non-disclosure agreements, or NDAs, are critical in protecting sensitive information between contracting parties, especially during their business dealings.
” I don’t know what “particular” third-party content means, but the statute doesn’t support any distinction based on “particular” and “non-particular” third-party content. .”
but limited to commercial websites and with tighter definitions of the restricted content. Many recent laws essentially mirror the “protect the kids online” initiatives of the 1990s and early 2000s, all of which failed as unconstitutional. The CDA essentially required websites to authenticate user age.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content