This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This guidance, which draws on the GDPR as well as national and EU case law, contains relevant advice for using AI in the healthcare space more broadly. For example, the Garante notes the need to incorporate dataprotection by design and by default principles within any AI systems used in the healthcare space. UK and U.S.
In late December 2023, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) published a Report and Order (“Order”) expanding the scope of the data breach notification rules (“Rules”) applicable to telecommunications carriers and interconnected VoIP (“iVoIP”) providers. statedata breach notification laws, which have a similar good faith exceptions.
And I think, really, really have to educate and continuously, you know, alert employees to this, you know, made sure there’s, you know, safe document destruction when data is done, you know, we all print out documents to read them as lawyers. So I definitely think data. I mentioned employee errors, but also insider threats.
Information Privacy Law. Addressing the medical privacy essentials: HIPPA and the new challenges posed by the rise of telemedicine, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic, this chapter closely examines medical privacy and it contains helpful practice notes pertaining to HIPPA’s intricate definitions and requirements.
In prior posts, we have written about the evolving state privacy law landscape, including how to prepare for state privacy laws coming into effect in 2023 here ; various aspects of the CCPA and CPRA, including here and here ; and the Virginia Consumer DataProtection Act (“VCDPA”) here.
Like other state privacy laws, the CTPA contains a number of entity-based and data-based exemptions, including financial institutions covered by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, national securities associations that are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and data regulated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act, among other exemptions.
Further, in a case that we have covered previously involving a supermarket using video surveillance with facial recognition capabilities, the Spanish dataprotection authority (the “AEDP”) fined grocer Mercadona for violating numerous provisions of the EU’s General DataProtection Regulation.
Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) excludes both “digital photographs” and “information derived from” photographs from the definition of “biometric information.” The TDPA provides for a private right of action for violation of the prohibition to sell, lease, or disclose data.
And I think, really, really have to educate and continuously, you know, alert employees to this, you know, made sure there’s, you know, safe document destruction when data is done, you know, we all print out documents to read them as lawyers. So I definitely think data. I mentioned employee errors, but also insider threats.
Even if not enacted, its provisions are likely to influence a future federal privacy law. And, in many ways, the ADPPA may set a new minimum standard that will shape any statelaws passed to fill the void left by the lack of a federal privacy law. We’ve previously written about the development of U.S. ADPPA § 302(a).
further in the direction of European-style privacy law. Colorado and Nevada join California and Virginia in adding to the growing patchwork of disparate statelaws — making it that much harder for any business seeking to have a single privacy program that is compliant everywhere.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content