This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The conference features sessions on everything from eDiscovery case law updates to cybersecurity for remote work. I’m especially interested in catching the morning session on AI legislative and judicial updates with State Senator Julian Bradley and Director of State Courts Audrey Skwierawski. MBALawTech2024.
In the blur of activity that was last week, I attended two legal tech conferences, plus an adjacent legal technology summit. After starting the week in New York at the glitzy celebration of big lawtech that is Legalweek , and ending it in Charlotte, N.C., Willie Sutton might say, “Sorry, that’s not where the money is.”
Today, we will start answering these questions with a very interesting Legal Advisor, Jon Bartman , who belongs to the Innovation Area of our Advisory and is the Co-founder of The LawTech Consultancy. My door is always open.” - Jon Bartman Co-founder, The LawTech Consultancy #legaltech #people #behindlegaltech
They are rapidly absorbing from the legal tech environment created by their predecessors. With university mashups of science and law, tech competency at bar associations, and Global Legal Hackathons , there is no place for these new lawyers to go but forward. ABA TECHSHOW 2019: Smart on Crime Initiative.
From disputes with landlords to dust-ups with shady creditors, she represented herself in court a couple times and quickly figured out litigation without a lawyer can be very difficult. In 2019 when Courtroom5 participated in the Duke LawTech Lab incubator program, Sonja met Maya Markovich who joined the Courtroom5 advisory board.
Justice tech has opened up a new consumer-focused market providing free, low bono or lower cost legal information and services through innovative new service models and emerging technologies and a massive opportunity for impact and ROI. Over the years, the Duke LawTech Lab evolved to exclusively focus our resources on justice tech startups.
In the blur of activity that was last week, I attended two legal tech conferences, plus an adjacent legal technology summit. After starting the week in New York at the glitzy celebration of big lawtech that is Legalweek , and ending it in Charlotte, N.C., Willie Sutton might say, “Sorry, that’s not where the money is.”
35:50 — Create follow ups based on court dates Automations are key to staying on top of court dates and ensuring no deadlines are missed. Devon wraps up this Deep Dive with a guide to creating date-based Automations, like reminders based on court appearance dates or other key points in your client’s matter.
For that reason, this is a great option for: Court documents Authorizations Forms from external organizations And more This will help you create documents that are identical to the original base version provided. While crafting DOCX templates might require a bit more effort, they offer unique advantages not found in our other options.
“Professed technological incompetence is not an excuse for discovery misconduct” is not a court holding you want to see (James v. For example, the bar exam can ask examinees to create documents with specific margins, page numbers, and styles, like the formats expected from local court rules. CV 8931-VCL, 2014 WL 6845560 (Del.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content