3 Geeks and a Law Blog

FEBRUARY 14, 2023

This protects the researcher from the AI “creating” the answer from all the non-relevant information it has collected in its large language model of machine learning. They do AI machine learning proofs of concepts for governments and large companies and so on. Lachance is working to use the GPT 3.5 I mean, this is yes.

Machine learning 130

Machine learning Case law Legal research Time-tracking 130

CaseFox

JULY 25, 2023

Through machine learning algorithms, e-discovery platforms can quickly identify patterns and connections in data. Additionally, digital forensics has become essential in cases involving digital evidence, such as cybercrimes and intellectual property disputes. This assists legal teams in building stronger cases.

e-discovery 52

e-discovery e-filing Lawyer Intellectual Property 52

The North Carolina Journey of Law and Technology

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

Generative AI certainly challenges our traditional notions of intellectual property rights, especially within copyright law. Novel AI tools such as Midjourney and Chat GPT raise new questions about whether works created with artificially intelligent machines can be copyrighted. While the U.S.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Machine learning Court Law 52

Lawmatics

AUGUST 8, 2023

Despite initial restrictions, like those imposed by US District Court judges and law schools like Berkeley and the University of Michigan, legal tech evangelist Nicole Black argues that these technologies should be embraced as valuable tools to streamline work and increase efficiencies. is from the 9th Circuit Court, 'Johnson v.

Client Intake 52

Client Intake Legal research Machine learning Court 52

Debevoise Data Blog

NOVEMBER 10, 2020

The investigations come just one month after a class action was filed in the English High Court against YouTube for allegedly processing children’s data without obtaining parental permission or providing appropriate disclosures (see our September Round Up ).

Data protection 52

Data protection Intellectual Property e-records Machine learning 52

LawSites

JANUARY 23, 2023

Parrot was built by veteran litigators and world class software engineers leveraging Machine Learning and AI to solve industry wide cost and time inefficiencies in court reporting and case/claims resolution. There are no videographer fees or other misc. What makes you unique or innovative? And all you need is your case number.

Litigator 98

Litigator Litigation Time-tracking e-discovery 98

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

AUGUST 22, 2023

And that’s one thing, providing it a change control clause, which is proprietary, valuable intellectual property for that organization. But when you’ve got a decentralized process, like common law, where you’ve got a circuit court in the foothills of Wisconsin with one judge and one local solicitor.

Legal AI 130

Legal AI Law firm Judge Time-tracking 130

Legal Tech Monitor

DECEMBER 4, 2023

While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders. We securely give fiduciaries access to assets when required with no password-sharing, no court orders, and correct titling.

Litigator 52

Litigator Litigation Mediator Law firm 52

Dennis Kennedy

SEPTEMBER 10, 2023

He’s an expert in AI, machine learning, and software development. If you want a commercial license to clarify your rights to any other intellectual property that might be associated with the G-A-L Method, please contact me. Ravi, the Tech Innovator: Ravi is a successful entrepreneur who has launched several tech startups.

Legal technology 71

Legal technology Legal technology Law Law 71

Legal Tech Monitor

AUGUST 22, 2023

And that’s one thing, providing it a change control clause, which is proprietary, valuable intellectual property for that organization. But when you’ve got a decentralized process, like common law, where you’ve got a circuit court in the foothills of Wisconsin with one judge and one local solicitor.

Legal AI 52

Legal AI Judge Time-tracking Lawyer 52

Legal Tech Monitor

SEPTEMBER 10, 2023

He’s an expert in AI, machine learning, and software development. If you want a commercial license to clarify your rights to any other intellectual property that might be associated with the G-A-L Method, please contact me. Ravi, the Tech Innovator: Ravi is a successful entrepreneur who has launched several tech startups.

Legal technology 52

Legal technology Legal technology Law Law 52

LawSites

MARCH 17, 2022

This will launch in a prelease version in April covering just personal injury, with a full release in July also covering labor and employment, insurance, business and commercial, real estate and intellectual property. Mockup of how a law firm could create a class action litigation dashboard using APIs from LexisNexis.

Analytics 98

Analytics Intellectual Property Machine learning Litigator 98

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023

And then after that, I made my way into the world of legal tech, working in data science for a company called RPI x, which was involved in serving the General Counsel’s Office of large tech firms on intellectual property matters. So work they’re developing natural language processing algorithms, working with with patent data.

Machine learning 147

Machine learning Hearing Time-tracking Lawyer 147

Legal Tech Monitor

SEPTEMBER 12, 2023

And then after that, I made my way into the world of legal tech, working in data science for a company called RPI x, which was involved in serving the General Counsel’s Office of large tech firms on intellectual property matters. So work they’re developing natural language processing algorithms, working with with patent data.

Hearing 52

Hearing Time-tracking Lawyer Software 52

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 19, 2024

The District of Delaware court follows the Anderson v. ” Facebook responded that it didn’t materially contribute to the illegality (a Roommates.com argument) but the court says it can’t resolve that on the motion to dismiss. .” Note the court could have possibly avoided engaging the Anderson precedent at all.

Court 97

Court Intellectual Property Machine learning Defendant 97