This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Brett Trout Nikes reputation as an industry leader in athletic footwear is built on a foundation of innovation and aggressive protection of its intellectualproperty. Nikes History of Defending Its Patents Nike is no stranger to intellectualproperty lawsuits. The case was settled in 2022. The lawsuit was settled in 2021.
Recently, the companys aggressive enforcement of its intellectualproperty (IP) has taken center stage, with high-profile lawsuits targeting game modders, emulator developers, and companies like Pocketpair, the creators of Palworld. A well-drafted patent can deter infringement before litigation even begins.
Brett Trout In the world of intellectualproperty, securing a patent is just the beginning. The key is crafting you patent not only for breadth, but with an eye toward litigation. Patent litigation, on the other hand, comes into play when a patent is challenged or infringed upon.
Brett Trout When it comes to intellectualproperty disputes, the stakes are high. Amazon , where Xiaohua Huang, a pro se litigant, attempted to enforce his patents against Amazon. The court ultimately dismissed his case, citing his persistent failures to address these issues. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Federal statutes do not provide clear answers to these questions, so courts will need to confront them. Already, lawsuits involving AI-generated works have been filed in federal courts from coast to coast. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts. A pending lawsuit in the U.S.
Brett Trout The Cost of Defending Your Patent As an inventor or patent holder, your intellectualproperty represents years of hard work, creativity, and financial expenditures. Even for smaller cases, where the damages are less than $1 million, the patent litigation costs average $700,000. Ready to explore your options?
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectualproperty rights.
While AI promises efficiency and cost savings, a recent case in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of including unverified AI-generated content in court filings. The court discovered that eight of those cases did not exist. Walmart Inc. &
Brett Trout In a high-stakes patent litigation case, Alpha Modus Corp. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of three patents related to real-time retail technology. Demand intellectualproperty indemnification clauses in agreements relating to technology launched by third-parties.
Brett Trout Patent litigation is often complex and high-stakes, but the case involvingLeigh Rothschild, Starbucks, and attorney Rachael Lamkinhas taken an unusual turn, morphing from a patent infringement lawsuit into allegations of fraud, and now, a defamation battle? from defendants through AT.
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
Heres what intellectualproperty attorneys and agricultural innovators should know about this landmark case. Implications for the IntellectualProperty and Legal Community The FTCs lawsuit against Deere raises important questions about how intellectualproperty rights intersect with antitrust law and consumer protection.
Protecting your idea through a patent is an essential step in safeguarding your intellectualproperty. Patent Agents : Individuals who are licensed to practice before the USPTO and can assist with filing and prosecution of patents but cannot provide legal advice or representation in court. What is a patent?
During our time, we did a deep-dive on the various ways that court redress is closed off from citizens seeking relief against federal, state, and local governing bodies. CLA 2019 Annual Meeting: IntellectualProperty Law Section. CLA 2019 Annual Meeting: Litigation Section–CLE Highlights and Section Updates.
After many rounds of motions to dismiss, intellectualproperty cases against AI developers are moving into the discovery phase. Just weeks into 2025, we got our first answer, with a court ordering OpenAI to produce a complete training dataset to plaintiffs. What Happened?
Three proposed billsthePREVAIL Act, RESTORE Act, and PERA (Patent Eligibility Restoration Act)aim to fix longstanding issues in patent law, making iteasier for inventors to obtain patents, defend them in court, and monetize their innovations. This law would give inventors a real weapon against infringers? to fall behind other countries.
Judge Colleen McMahon of the Southern District of New York dismissed plaintiffs’ suit in its entirety, holding that plaintiffs had no cognizable claim for damages or injunctive relief because they failed at this stage of litigation to demonstrate that they had been harmed in any way by OpenAI’s actions. Double Scienter. Corelogic, Inc.,
I’m pleased to share a draft of a new paper, “ A SAD New Category of Abusive IntellectualPropertyLitigation.” This paper explains the scheme, how it bypasses standard legal safeguards, how it’s affected hundreds of thousands of defendants, and how it may have cost the federal courts a quarter-billion dollars.
Litigation : This area of practice involves representing clients in court, including civil and criminal trials, appeals, and alternative dispute resolution. Intellectualproperty law: This area of practice involves protecting clients’ intellectualproperty rights, such as trademarks, copyrights, and patents.
Some forms of data are protected by copyright, trademark, or another cognizable forms of intellectualproperty. But most of the data on the Internet isn’t easily protectible as intellectualproperty by those who might have an incentive to protect it. LinkedIn Corp. In the end, it was a pyrrhic victory.
While lawyers in all fields skip vacations, work-life balance may be more accessible in fields with typically more predictable, consistent hours, such as intellectualproperty, real estate, and trust and estate law. Vacation Slackers Workers in most industries, including law, find it difficult to truly disconnect while on vacation.
Vague, overly-broad, and overly-narrow language can significantly weaken your application if used incorrectly or without a clear understanding of how patent claims need to be drafted and are interpreted by courts and the USPTO.
Regardless of whether this suit follows through with litigation or settles outside of court, many agree that this legal battle will be detrimental to the future of A.I. This lawsuit is the first time that courts will have the opportunity to address A.I. generator companies. Interestingly, A.I. generators and similar technology.
But this assertion is belied by the “Create-a-Star” feature and by evidence produced at trial establishing that Defendants previously altered tattoos of wrestlers to avoid infringing on others’ intellectualproperty.” Obviously the court was bothered by the Create-a-Star feature.
Invisible Narratives sought an ex parte TRO to prevent that from happening, which the court grants. The court relies on 512(f) as the basis of the TRO: “Invisible Narratives has presented evidence that Next Level was neither the original creator of Skibidi Toilet nor the lawful copyright owner of Skibidi Toilet characters.
Because of the data stored in these smart objects, some lawyers may opt to use this data as evidence in litigation or mediation cases. Existing technology (like security cameras) can guide lawyers when presenting this type of evidence in court. These smart objects collect images, voice messages, and video recordings.
I’m pleased to share the final published version of my article, “ A SAD Scheme of Abusive IntellectualPropertyLitigation.” Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme In a SAD Scheme Case, Court Rejects Injunction Over “Emoji” Trademark Schedule A (SAD Scheme) Plaintiff Sanctioned for “Fraud on the Court”–Xped v.
Advertisements have become a powerful tool for plaintiff lawyers specializing in mass litigation, according to a Wall Street Journal article titled “The Latest Ad Boom: Lawyers Seeking Plaintiffs for Mass Litigation” published in January 2024. Courting Your Clients is offered exclusively by Legal Expert Connections, Inc.,
Among these roles, lawyers and litigators often create confusion due to their similarities. In this comprehensive blog post, we will delve into the world of litigators, shedding light on their specific role and how it differs from that of a lawyer. What is a Litigator?
Her recent scholarly work includes “The New Private Law and IntellectualProperty,” forthcoming in the Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law (2020); and “IntellectualProperty as Property,” in the Research Handbook on the Economics of IntellectualProperty Law (2019).
Some of them described themselves and why they read the blog: “A senior director on our legal team forwarded one of your blog posts to a few of us on the litigation team a few days into me starting in-house. ” “Im a litigator often specializing in internet law related issues, particularly under Section 230.
I am a big fan of litigation analytics, even once suggesting that it could be malpractice for a litigator not to use the technology. Analytics might tell you, for example, that, in intellectualproperty cases, Judge Smith decides summary judgment motions for plaintiffs 70% of the time. But it only tells you past behavior.
It is a crucial part of modern litigation because so much information is now stored digitally and this information can be vital to the outcome of a case. A court case might involve reviewing a client’s social media account, emails, and digital documents to determine the merits of an intellectualproperty lawsuit.
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. 569 (1994).
The court says that using scraped data after receiving a cease-and-desist notice is not a violation of the CFAA, even if the data was collected from beneath a log-in from a site that prohibits scraping. That’s a reasonable inference from Van Buren , but no court has explicitly said as much before. The terms prohibited scraping.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
Even better, posting has enabled me to think through a doctrine (like failure to function ) or category of cases (like tagmark litigation) that I was already pondering, setting the initial groundwork for what would become a more extended study in the form of a law review article or essay.
Michael Sander , the founder of Docket Alarm , a product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case analytics, has left the company, seven months after its acquisition by legal research company vLex in April. Here is his entire email: “My last day running Docket Alarm will be today.
For instance, machine learning can predict litigation risks based on similar cases, identify trends that might impact a client, or flag unusual clauses in contracts that might need extra attention. Its particularly useful for litigation teams looking to analyze case trends, predict outcomes, and gain insights into opposing counsel or judges.
“Courting Your Clients” via membership organizations is a valuable resource for lawyers looking to generate leads and grow their business. ” The “Courting Your Clients” Legal Marketing Agency We want to serve as your outsourced law firm marketing department! a national law firm marketing agency.
the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectualproperty (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. Hetronic International Inc. , In Yegiazaryan v.
It simply converts a litigation battle over retaliation into a battle over whether the DJP violated the TOS. However, courts might consider such broad drafting efforts to be bad faith non-compliance with the bill. ” The court also questioned the tailoring fit. Note: section (c) doesn’t negate this issue at all.
Related Law Firm Marketing Articles The Secret Sauce for Law Firm Marketing on LinkedIn Courting Your Clients E-Book The Value Equation in Law Firm Marketing Turn Membership Organizations into New Law Firm Business The “Courting Your Clients” Legal Marketing Agency We want to serve as your outsourced law firm marketing department!
Supreme Court, SCOTUSblog provides insights on what petitions to watch. Additionally, the blog usually reports on every merits case before the court three times: before argument, after argument, and after the decision. You’ll find coverage of government lawmaking, litigation, transactions, and more. Law360 Law360 touts 2.7
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content