This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. What Can You Ask a Court To Do? What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy. What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy.
Looking for insights into what promises to be another eventful Supreme Court term? The Supreme Court plays a central role in shaping the legal landscape of the United States. Professor Amar and Professor Dorf plan to explore key matters being considered by the Court, including Second Amendment issues in United States v.
He is also the author of several books and over 60 articles in leading law reviews, focusing on constitutional law, federal courts, and civil procedure. Michael Dorf is a Professor of Law at Cornell Law School, with a focus on constitutional law and federal courts. Supreme Court on our legal landscape. More Questions?
A new first-of-its-kind app and companion website, called FosterPower , provide foster youth with comprehensive but easy-to-understand information about their rights to mental health care, education and legal protections. FosterPower provides foster youth with information on their rights in seven areas: Independent living.
Trellis AI leverages the largest repository of state trial court data to help litigators evaluate cases, automate brief drafting, suggest winning strategies, and more. Key Witnesses — Identify the people involved in the case and their roles to inform decisions about document requests, interrogatories, and depositions.
The defendant conceded summary judgment on liability, and the court held a trial on damages. This post covers the court’s ruling following the damages trial. Setting the Damages Range The court rejects KMC’s innocent infringement defense. Not willful. Defendant’s financial benefit. ” Deterrence.
It may be best known for CourtListener, its flagship project that houses an immense collection of court orders and opinions, and for its RECAP suite, which is the largest free collection […]
These now provide a wealth of information about aspects such as admissions, academics, costs, extracurriculars, and the careers of graduates. Heres a general overview of the information that the enhanced profiles provide and how theyre laid out. Law Schools Center. This section isnt all numbers, though.
This collaboration features award-winning legal technologists Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell as they test drive Green Filings new Auto File tool, designed to read and incorporate filing content directly from the court documents. For more information about the podcast, visit legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/kennedy-mighell-report.
With our court data solution, financial experts can access critical litigation insights, making it an invaluable resource for informed decision-making in the financial sector. Finance teams find Trellis to be particularly effective in conducting comprehensive due diligence on both individuals and businesses.
While AI promises efficiency and cost savings, a recent case in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of including unverified AI-generated content in court filings. The court discovered that eight of those cases did not exist. Walmart Inc. &
In other words, what are the advantages of a trauma-informed justice system? Here, we explore what we mean by a trauma-informed justice system and its potential benefits. We also discuss how we can move towards a more trauma-informed system while overcoming future challenges. What is a trauma-informed justice system?
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the main court for resolving patent issues) issued a significant decision in Recentive Analytics, Inc. The Court’s Analysis Applying the two-step framework from Alice Corp. Brett Trout On April 18, 2025, the U.S. Fox Corp. (No.
Craft Engaging and Informative AI-Assisted Content Legal blog posts need to be well-researched, clear, and engaging to establish credibility and keep readers interested. Your content must comply with legal advertising regulations, uphold client confidentiality, and provide accurate, truthful information.
On April 26, 2023, the General Court of the European Union issued its judgment in Case T-557/20, SRB v EDPS. The Court held that pseudonymized data transmitted to a data recipient will not be considered personal data if the data recipient does not have the means to re-identify the data subjects. Pseudonymous or anonymous data.
Extensively citing Chabolla , the court rejects the arbitration request. The court says Plex’s relationship context cuts against TOS formation. The top of the Facebook Userflow informs the user that Plex is requesting access to the user’s profile picture and email address. Plex offers free video streaming.
In addition, 7150 (b) and 7153 require companies to conduct internal risk assessments (particularly when profiling is involved) and share relevant information with third parties in plain language. Explicitly extending opt-in consent to the processing of sensitive information would be a step in the right direction.
Federal, state and local court e-filing systems are a Tower of Babel-like mishmash of proprietary technologies and paywalls that inhibit public access to court documents. “It is particularly harmful to those that cannot afford to pay for court records.”
In the Bannon case, the appeals court held that Bannon’s post could qualify for anti-SLAPP protection and remanded to explore if Nelson met his pleading burdens. The court easily disagrees. The court says the test for public interest is measured objectively, not subjectively, and was satisfied here.
So many people would come seeking general legal information that the lawyers would not be able to get to all the people who had come specifically for conservatorship help. “What we’re offering are really clear and organized paths to information and also to connect with services,” Hayden said.
Candidate, 2025 No one wants to be left holding the bag after a break-in, but for chief information security officers (CISOs), the risk of liability is ever-present. District Court for the Southern District of New York suggests that CISOs might be outside of point-blank range. By Gaurav Lalsinghani, J.D.
As for the legal briefing on your own cases, book a demo with Clio to see how our practice management solution can help you keep case information and documents organized and boost your productivity. Unlike legal briefs , case briefs are not submitted to the court or opposing counsel. What is a case brief?
According to Pandabuy’s website, “All the searched products are from third party platforms, Pandabuy only provides information search, agent shopping and shipping services. Pandabuy initially no-showed in the case, so the court converted the TRO to a preliminary injunction. The court distinguishes Atari v.
It was a fairly intimate, invitation-only gathering of roughly 65 people, held under the Chatham House Rule, meaning that participants were free to use the information we received, but we agreed not to disclose the identity or affiliation of the speakers or participants. What impact could this have on how courts consider and accept evidence?
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
I’m sure you’re surprised to learn that when the judge actually reviewed the matter on a fully informed basis, it didn’t see trademark infringement. The court should have embraced its first instinct that the merchant didn’t use “emoji” as a mark. ” Trademark law does not restrict that usage.
This tool allows law firms to analyze aggregated and normalized state trial court data to gain competitive intelligence across cases, practice areas, and performance. Collecting this unstructured data from county courts is very challenging, but provides valuable business insights. But steady growth has now built their credibility.
A basic board might include columns for Intake, Information Gathering, Drafting, Review, and Completed. For example, a document may cycle through drafting and review, or even information gathering, drafting, and review several times before being completed.
While Ai.law already had modules for litigation tasks such as answering a lawsuit, responding to discovery, and pulling summaries from medical records, this new module allows a user to input relevant information about a case and generate a complete complaint.
Karlen Jonathan Karlen, who is not an attorney, filed a pro se appeal in the Missouri Court of Appeals. His initial filing was deficient in several respects, but after the court gave him several deadline extensions, he ultimately filed an appellate brief and a reply brief. The court was not sympathetic. ” Smith v. .
The plaintiffs allege that Confirm ID violates the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The court says that the plaintiffs’ allegations treat AFF as the data controller and Confirm ID as the data processor, and that’s sufficient to acknowledge the affiliate relationship. Martell v. Kuklinski v.
This represents a goldmine of information about the litigation process. Read Our Article… Continue reading → The post ⚡Primer on Using State Court Trial Data for Business and Competitive Intelligence first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog. Approximately 41,000 civil lawsuits are filed daily in the U.S.,
Shopify said California courts lack personal jurisdiction over it. The district court agreed with Shopify, as did a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit. The en banc court issues a total of four opinions, and collectively they show Shopify was never close. Briskin sued Shopify for a variety of privacy violations in California.
Recently, the Cologne District Court ruled that a German mobile operator’s use of Google Analytics violated the GDPR’s requirements for international data transfers. The Cologne District Court ruling only applies to the defendant in the case, Telekom Deutschland GmbH.
Supreme Court handed down its most famous decision involving the powers of government agencies. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the Court in devising a doctrine that has become known as Chevron deference. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the Court in devising a doctrine that has become known as Chevron deference.
Federal statutes do not provide clear answers to these questions, so courts will need to confront them. Already, lawsuits involving AI-generated works have been filed in federal courts from coast to coast. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts. A pending lawsuit in the U.S.
Increased Access to Justice : AI has the potential to greatly expand access to legal information and resources, particularly for individuals with limited means. It can provide guidance on basic legal questions, help with court forms, and offer directions on presenting cases to judges.
If this happens, a consumer might be able to pursue a claim in court. The Consumer Protection Law Center offers information about these topics and others related to consumer rights. When the damages are relatively limited, a consumer might consider pursuing action in small claims court.
The court says this implementation isn’t a sign-in-wrap because the CMG terms lacked a call-to-action: “the login through Facebook screen never informed Plaintiff that acceptance of a separate agreement was required before she could access the service, which is the defining feature of a sign-in wrap agreement.”
This landmark case was the first and only Mexican-American civil rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court. Her talent and grit were noticed, and she received a recommendation by the Texas congressional delegation for nomination by the White House to a United States District Court seat in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 2010.
In my prior post on this case , I covered how the court denied efforts to enjoin the Utah law on Section 230 and dormant commerce clause grounds. And as expected, the court indeed enjoined the law on First Amendment grounds. The court rejects the state’s evidence about the purported harms of social media usage.
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County’s Court Technology Services (CTS) Division suffered a ransomware attack on Friday 19 July leading to it having to shut down the Court’s internal […] The post Superior Court of Los Angeles County suffers ransomware attack appeared first on Legal IT Insider.
Pre/Dicta , a litigation analytics platform that predicts how federal court judges will rule, is expanding to cover new motion types and also to predict litigation timelines. Rather, it is modeling outcomes for specific judges, cases and courts by using data profiling.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content