This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The e-discovery company Casepoint is investigating a data breach after a ransomware gang claimed to have over two terabytes of its data, including attorney files, visa details, information from the U.S. Courts, the U.S. government, “and many other things that you have tried so hard to keep.”
You may know it more through its brands, including ServeNow for finding process servers, One Legal for California courtfiling, LawToolBox for court calendaring, and the Legal Talk Network group of legal podcasts. On the latest LawNext podcast, our guest Ed Watts , CEO of InfoTrack in the U.S., InfoTrack in the U.S.
While AI promises efficiency and cost savings, a recent case in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of including unverified AI-generated content in courtfilings. The court discovered that eight of those cases did not exist. Walmart Inc. &
Get free e-book For modern law firms, selecting suitable tools is no longer a matter of choice but of necessity. Legal-Specific Calendar Tools: Never Miss a Deadline Again In the legal world where missed deadlines have consequences, efficient calendar management is vital and needs to go beyond basic scheduling to comply with court rules.
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
In fairness, the Missouri case involved a pro se litigant, not a lawyer, but that pro se litigant claimed to have gotten the citations from a lawyer he hired through the internet. Karlen , the unwitting litigantfiled an appellate brief in which 22 of 24 cases were fictitious. The court was not sympathetic.
Gavin McGrane was a litigation attorney in San Francisco when he saw an opportunity to improve how legal professionals interface with the federal courts electronic records system, PACER, and to enable them to better tap into the data and knowledge contained within that system. . A reminder that we are on Patreon.
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
Any litigator will eventually have to contend with motions to compel discovery (also known as motions for discovery). This is why motions for discovery are filed and argued. Here, we explore in more detail the role of these motions in modern litigation. E-discovery often requires more extensive court supervision and oversight.
These are only the second and third non-profit projects to be approved to participate in the sandbox and the first in the nation to empower non-lawyers go give limited-scope legal advice about medical debt, according to Stacy Butler , director of the Innovation for Justice Program at the University of Arizona James E.
The e-discovery company Casepoint is investigating a data breach after a ransomware gang claimed to have over two terabytes of its data, including attorney files, visa details, information from the U.S. Courts, the U.S. government, “and many other things that you have tried so hard to keep.” Casepoint’s clients include the U.S.
For example, cross-border litigation is now widespread as global commerce increases. Consequently, as more corporations operate in more countries, the potential of litigation over patent infringements, copyright violations, and product liability rises. Multilingual E-Discovery . This is where multilingual e-discovery comes in.
JD E-Commerce America Ltd., The court is unclear about how Joybuy operates, but it appears that Joybuy (via the entity JD) runs its own online marketplace. The court says that Joybuy sufficiently established that it ran its own online marketplace and thus qualified as a service provider. Omnia Studios Ltd.
You may know it more through its brands, including ServeNow for finding process servers, One Legal for California courtfiling, LawToolBox for court calendaring, and the Legal Talk Network group of legal podcasts. says the company is on a mission to innovate and even revolutionize litigation services and the litigation workflow.
Steno , a tech-enabled provider of litigation support services, whose flagship product, DelayPay , enables law firms to defer service costs until their case resolves, has closed a Series B funding round of $15 million, bringing its total raise to $38.5 This latest round was led by Left Lane Capital. ” . ”
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
In the mid-2010s, plaintiffs filed about 20 lawsuits filed around the country seeking to hold social media services liable for allegedly facilitating terrorist attacks. Twitter, produced Supreme Court rulings last year. In light of that conclusion, the court declined to rule on the parallel Gonzalez v.
The City was found to be grossly negligent in issuing and executing its litigation hold for the preservation of email and text messages. The City did not issue a litigation hold until three years AFTER the complaint had been filed. In all, the Court noted a total of fewer than 25 emails produced from key players.
The plaintiff eventually dismissed all of the defendants within 5 weeks of filing the complaint. The court ruled on Hyponix and NinjaSafe’s requests for damages from the bond, dismissal with prejudice, and attorneys’ fees. The court pays out some of the bond but rejects the other relief. Proximate Damage.
For instance, machine learning can predict litigation risks based on similar cases, identify trends that might impact a client, or flag unusual clauses in contracts that might need extra attention. E-Discovery E-discovery focuses on finding and organizing digital information for legal cases.
Ryanair recently “prevailed” in its CFAA claim in its litigation against Booking.com. This has been a hard case to follow online, because many of the key rulings have been filed under seal. Goliath in web-scraping litigation than the long-standing legal dispute between Ryanair v. And there is no better example of Goliath v.
By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down. Step Two: The CCB does a compliance review of the filed claim to determine if the claim qualifies for the CCB. The respondent files a response to the claim.
Public access to court data through automated collection of online court records is a fundamental First Amendment right and it is critical to meaningful access to the United States legal system. The recent ruling in South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v.
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
If an attorney conducts any form of civil or criminal litigation in U.S. courts, they will be dealing with motions filed in court. Here we explore the essential aspects of writing court motions, including research, analysis, drafting, and filing. What is a court motion?
As business clients deploy new technology to manage litigation, contracts and communications, they will prefer working with equally tech-focused outside counsel. Technology providers are responding to this shift with practice-specific tools and features and integrations with courts, regulatory bodies and other industry resources.
Draft Motions and Briefs A study by Bloomberg Law found that 84% of litigators rank drafting motions and briefs as their most time-consuming task. How you carry yourself in court and appeal to the jury’s emotions is something only a human can do. Look for tools made for litigators that keep data within your instance.
Jackie Schafer: I started out as a litigator at Paul Weiss, but spent most of my career in public service as an assistant attorney general, where I was regularly briefing and arguing cases before the state appellate courts in Alaska and Washington state. Ari Kaplan: Tell us about your background and the genesis of Clearbrief.
Sorting through thousands of files manually can take weeks or even months, which often leaves legal teams stretched thin and weighed down by repetitive tasks. While its often used in litigation, its just as useful for managing contracts and handling other legal tasks outside of court cases.
Steno , a tech-enabled provider of litigation support services, whose flagship product, DelayPay , enables law firms to defer service costs until their case resolves, has closed a Series B funding round of $15 million, bringing its total raise to $38.5 This latest round was led by Left Lane Capital.
In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals.
The Illinois Supreme Court Rules Committee will hold a public hearing on November 15 to hear public comment on five proposals. at the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts (222 N. at the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts (222 N. The hearing will be held at 10:30 a.m. The hearing will be held at 10:30 a.m.
As lawyers know all too well, legal e-filing systems can be a headache to navigate. Without a standard across states or nationally, each court has its own setup, and these systems often come with clunky, confusing interfaces. What is e-filing?
In fairness, the Missouri case involved a pro se litigant, not a lawyer, but that pro se litigant claimed to have gotten the citations from a lawyer he hired through the internet. Karlen , the unwitting litigantfiled an appellate brief in which 22 of 24 cases were fictitious. The court was not sympathetic.
In today’s digital age, the role of the e-discovery lawyer is increasingly important. Attorneys who specialize in e-discovery ensure information relevant to legal matters is carefully preserved, reviewed, and produced in compliance with regulations. What is e-discovery in law? What does an e-discovery lawyer do?
Also, Court clerks are indispensable members of the judicial system. So, what exactly does it mean to be a court clerk? So, what exactly does it mean to be a court clerk? Court clerk duties and responsibilities First off, what does a courtroom clerk do on a daily basis? Where do court clerks work?
Proof Raises $30M Series B Proof Technology , whose platform facilitates on-demand service of process and electronic filing, has closed a $30.4 Proof provides a litigation services marketplace where law firms and government agencies can access a nationwide network of process servers, electronic courtfiling services, and remote notarization.
The Delaware court system is recognized throughout the legal profession as a leading forum for the litigation of business and commercial disputes. It cuts out steps and ensures that everyone gets the filing, that everyone is on the same page,” said Brian E. “It State Court Expansion. Automatic Distribution.
The Delaware court system is recognized throughout the legal profession as a leading forum for the litigation of business and commercial disputes. It cuts out steps and ensures that everyone gets the filing, that everyone is on the same page,” said Brian E. “It State Court Expansion. Automatic Distribution.
Law.com Radar, a service that delivers AI-enhanced alerts of new lawsuits filed in more than 2,400 U.S. federal and state courts, is now tagging all new civil filings using the taxonomy developed by the SALI Alliance, a group working to standardize legal data across the industry.
I previously blogged about one such case, where Squishmallow sued 90 e-commerce merchants in a sealed complaint and got a TRO. Alibaba and AliExpress did indeed fight back, filing a motion to dismiss that I discussed in my prior post. The court says, per Taamneh v. Typical SAD Scheme stuff. This passage confused me a lot.
Theoretically, certain documents are supposed to be freely accessible to the public, including documents contained in the dockets of the federal courts. That access is accomplished through PACER – Public Access to Court Electronic Records. 6714, the Electronic Court Records Reform Act, seeks to open up PACER to users for free.
In re: StubHub Refund Litigation , No. The district court said that the buyers who made their purchases on the website had to go to arbitration, but the buyers who made their purchases on their mobile devices could stay in court. The court sees it differently. 22-15879 (9th Cir. Citing Sellers v. Sadlock v.
Guy Rub , The Ohio State University Michael E. There are more than 300 opinions by federal courts dealing with the express preemption of contracts, and within them two main approaches have emerged. Until recently, the Sixth Circuit was the most prominent court that endorsed this approach. by guest blogger Prof. A third approach?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content