This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Federal, state and local courte-filing systems are a Tower of Babel-like mishmash of proprietary technologies and paywalls that inhibit public access to court documents. “It is particularly harmful to those that cannot afford to pay for courtrecords.”
By creating more and faster connections to clients, colleagues, and the courts, Clio provides the essential tools they need to foster strong relationships, increase profitability, and run a healthy, thriving practice. The Clio Personal Injury add-on includes features for managing medical records and providers.
You may know it more through its brands, including ServeNow for finding process servers, One Legal for California courtfiling, LawToolBox for court calendaring, and the Legal Talk Network group of legal podcasts. InfoTrack may be one of the fastest growing yet least known legal technology companies in the United States.
On today’sLawNext, it’s a Clio double header, featuring two separate interviews with two of Clio’s top product-focused executives – one with Jonathan Watson , its chief technology officer, and the other with Hemant Kashyap , chief product officer – both recorded live at the Clio Cloud Conference in Nashville in October.
Gavin McGrane was a litigation attorney in San Francisco when he saw an opportunity to improve how legal professionals interface with the federal courts electronic records system, PACER, and to enable them to better tap into the data and knowledge contained within that system. . A reminder that we are on Patreon.
Federal, state and local courte-filing systems are a Tower of Babel-like mishmash of proprietary technologies and paywalls that inhibit public access to court documents. It kicked off the project this week with a search to hire a researcher to do the initial legwork and a call for courts interested in partnering.
Everlaw for Good is a program run by the e-discovery company Everlaw , through which it makes its software available at no cost to legal aid organizations, nonprofit organizations, and investigative journalists. At the recent Everlaw Summit, the CJA’s work using the Everlaw platform was honored with the Everlaw for Good award.
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” Nealy , No.
One further note: Last week, after we recorded this conversation, a federal court in Alabama ruled that the Corporate Transparency Act is unconstitutional. The ruling is limited to the two plaintiffs who filed the suit, and the federal government said it will file an appeal.
Electronic signatures (or e-signatures) have become nearly ubiquitous in everyday life and business—from confirming your agreement to terms and conditions on a website, to using e-signature tools to sign a work contract. What is an e-signature? But are electronic signatures legally binding? What is an electronic signature?
By creating more and faster connections to clients, colleagues, and the courts, Clio provides the essential tools they need to foster strong relationships, increase profitability, and run a healthy, thriving practice. The Clio Personal Injury add-on includes features for managing medical records and providers.
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
At a time when legal technology companies are making it easier to access and analyze court documents, what should – and should not – be done to protect confidential court documents that are sealed from public access? Sara Collins , vice president of product management, File & ServeXpress. Were these actions justified?
Therefore, the need for reliable data protection always remains relevant, considering that information about new record fines due to data protection violations is increasingly appearing. The SRB uploaded the files to a virtual server and provided access to these files to a limited number of Deloitte employees directly involved in the project.
Jackie Schafer: I started out as a litigator at Paul Weiss, but spent most of my career in public service as an assistant attorney general, where I was regularly briefing and arguing cases before the state appellate courts in Alaska and Washington state. ’ Most cases are won or lost based on the writing.
As lawyers know all too well, legal e-filing systems can be a headache to navigate. Without a standard across states or nationally, each court has its own setup, and these systems often come with clunky, confusing interfaces. What is e-filing?
Sorting through thousands of files manually can take weeks or even months, which often leaves legal teams stretched thin and weighed down by repetitive tasks. While its often used in litigation, its just as useful for managing contracts and handling other legal tasks outside of court cases.
Public access to court data through automated collection of online courtrecords is a fundamental First Amendment right and it is critical to meaningful access to the United States legal system. The recent ruling in South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v.
You may know it more through its brands, including ServeNow for finding process servers, One Legal for California courtfiling, LawToolBox for court calendaring, and the Legal Talk Network group of legal podcasts. InfoTrack may be one of the fastest growing yet least known legal technology companies in the United States.
One further note: Last week, after we recorded this conversation, a federal court in Alabama ruled that the Corporate Transparency Act is unconstitutional. The ruling is limited to the two plaintiffs who filed the suit, and the federal government said it will file an appeal.
Lawyers have been working “remotely” for decades — from the courts, in their cars, from suburban outposts, at clients’ offices and, yes, from home. We used to call them mobile lawyers or even e-lawyers. Such recordings will allow them to witness how deals are made firsthand. Now we just call them lawyers.)
I previously blogged about one such case, where Squishmallow sued 90 e-commerce merchants in a sealed complaint and got a TRO. Alibaba and AliExpress did indeed fight back, filing a motion to dismiss that I discussed in my prior post. The court says, per Taamneh v. Typical SAD Scheme stuff.
The plaintiff eventually dismissed all of the defendants within 5 weeks of filing the complaint. The court ruled on Hyponix and NinjaSafe’s requests for damages from the bond, dismissal with prejudice, and attorneys’ fees. The court pays out some of the bond but rejects the other relief. Proximate Damage.
Two top-line takeaways you might get from this post: A two-click formation process avoids the risk of judges moving the goalposts about formation, and If you are amending your TOS, have an airtight plan for building a credible evidentiary record. The court sees it differently. In re: StubHub Refund Litigation , No. 22-15879 (9th Cir.
This has been a hard case to follow online, because many of the key rulings have been filed under seal. To my knowledge, it is still not public record. According to this court, it is. As a result, it is entirely possible that I am missing some key details here. I discuss the details of that ruling below.
Also, Court clerks are indispensable members of the judicial system. So, what exactly does it mean to be a court clerk? So, what exactly does it mean to be a court clerk? Court clerk duties and responsibilities First off, what does a courtroom clerk do on a daily basis? Where do court clerks work?
If you miss a phone call, the software follows up using a pre-recorded voice message. You can also record your phone calls and track who called and when so that you have the audio file of your conversation for later reference. Move matters along with one-click e-signature.
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. 569 (1994).
If you’ve been in the legal industry for some time, you’re probably familiar with the struggles of submitting court documents in person. The ordeal typically involves carving out time in your busy day to print paperwork, hand-delivering it to the courthouse (or arranging a courier), and then obtaining a file stamp.
Get free e-book Lawyers lose 40% of the time they spend working to inefficient, manual processes that cover work outside the practice of law. When an important hearing or filing due date changes, staff must adjust multiple related tasks by hand. If a key date shifts, any events associated with it are automatically rescheduled.
He underscores the challenge and opportunity in educating and transitioning firms to embrace digital practices for docketing and courtfilings, emphasizing InfoTrack’s mission to expand electronic access to court services for the betterment of legal accessibility and efficiency. Marlene Gebauer 9:43 Sure. So we do do that.
Get free e-book Lawyers lose 40% of the time they spend working to inefficient, manual processes that cover work outside the practice of law. When an important hearing or filing due date changes, staff must adjust multiple related tasks by hand. If a key date shifts, any events associated with it are automatically rescheduled.
From scheduling to document filing and billing, these tasks become unwieldy if they are not standardized with the right technology. When there is no clear workflow or unified platform, staff may lose track of deadlines, duplicate efforts, or generate inaccuracies in record-keeping.
By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down. Step Two: The CCB does a compliance review of the filed claim to determine if the claim qualifies for the CCB. The respondent files a response to the claim.
Theoretically, certain documents are supposed to be freely accessible to the public, including documents contained in the dockets of the federal courts. That access is accomplished through PACER – Public Access to Court Electronic Records. Doug Collins (R-Ga.)
All your interactions with these virtual home assistant devices are recorded, and the recordings are likely being reviewed by a company employee and fed back into their system to improve the AI central to the device’s functioning. Remember how much you practiced your first moot court argument or your first “real court” argument?
Litigation Radio’s Aug 15, 2023 episode discusses how litigation firms are already using AI and the prompt nuances for stronger e-discovery: Litigation Radio AI, The Law, And Your Firm: What You Need To Know Today Your user agent does not support the HTML5 Audio element. It takes more than just pushing a button to get a usable document.
At a time when legal technology companies are making it easier to access and analyze court documents, what should – and should not – be done to protect confidential court documents that are sealed from public access? Sara Collins , vice president of product management, File & ServeXpress. Were these actions justified?
On today’sLawNext, it’s a Clio double header, featuring two separate interviews with two of Clio’s top product-focused executives – one with Jonathan Watson , its chief technology officer, and the other with Hemant Kashyap , chief product officer – both recorded live at the Clio Cloud Conference in Nashville in October.
March 1 marked the culmination of an ambitious and audacious project to digitize and provide free and open access to all official court decisions ever published in the United States. million published cases, some dating as far back as 1658. Thank You To Our Sponsors This episode of LawNext is generously made possible by our sponsors.
I have met lawyers who have a crazy idea: They HAVE to read EVERY email, document, Excel file, video, and every other bit of ESI produced in discovery. Lawyers have a duty of competency to their client, and candor to the court, to look at what is relevant to their case and responsive to discovery requests. That position is wrong.
The City did not issue a litigation hold until three years AFTER the complaint had been filed. The Court stated that litigation hold was not effectively communicated and the officers listed in the City’s initial disclosures did not acknowledge receiving the hold notice. The Court applied the elements from Chin v. Stinson, at *5.
Dessert: sweet news about e-RUPI opening new doors for PPI issuers. For instance, it refused to lift ban on loading of e-wallets through credit lines. The next day, it filed a complaint against Coinbase. If the defending business fails in court, it faces punitive action. Takeaway : articles and podcasts to grab and go.
Gavin McGrane was a litigation attorney in San Francisco when he saw an opportunity to improve how legal professionals interface with the federal courts electronic records system, PACER, and to enable them to better tap into the data and knowledge contained within that system. A reminder that we are on Patreon.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content