This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In a first for an e-discovery technology company, Chicago-based Nextpoint is launching an Arizona law firm June 1 under that state’s liberalized law practice rules that allow non-lawyers to own law practices. Its lawyers will not appear in court. NLG’s lawyers will not go to court or take depositions, Greene said.
As a small or solo firm, you could be using AI for things such as legal research, document review, e-discovery, and predictive analytics. The recording of this broadcast will also be available to Justia Connect Pro members shortly after the live event. ET/11:00 a.m. PT on Wednesday, June 05, 2024.
The Seattle-based legal tech startup Clearbrief already uses artificial intelligence to strengthen your legal writing by finding the best evidence in the record to support your arguments (or debunk your opponent’s). From that document set, the user can select which documents to use to generate the timeline.
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.”
Everlaw for Good is a program run by the e-discovery company Everlaw , through which it makes its software available at no cost to legal aid organizations, nonprofit organizations, and investigative journalists. At the recent Everlaw Summit, the CJA’s work using the Everlaw platform was honored with the Everlaw for Good award.
Following her keynote, LawNext host Bob Ambrogi, who was at the conference, sat down with Gonzalez to record this conversation about her thoughts on KM, innovation, AI, culture, change management, and much more. Thank You To Our Sponsors This episode of LawNext is generously made possible by our sponsors. Littler, local everywhere.
The practice of e-discovery has always incorporated considerations of new and emerging technologies as well as related attorney competence. What information is being kept in such blockchain-based records? Is blockchain-based data anonymized, tokenized, or otherwise protected?
As if all that were not enough to keep Nori busy, he recently published a memoir, Sheltered: Twenty Years in Housing Court , and gave a TEDx talk, How A Chatbot Can Save Someone From Homelessness. We appreciate their support and hope you will check them out.
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
Cut Down on Discovery Time Sifting through discovery is a big undertaking, with most cases taking at least several months to complete. The need to respond quickly to discovery requests promptly adds even more pressure. How you carry yourself in court and appeal to the jury’s emotions is something only a human can do.
In a first for an e-discovery technology company, Chicago-based Nextpoint is launching an Arizona law firm June 1 under that state’s liberalized law practice rules that allow non-lawyers to own law practices. Its lawyers will not appear in court. NLG’s lawyers will not go to court or take depositions, Greene said.
Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.
Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. 569 (1994).
While its often used in litigation, its just as useful for managing contracts and handling other legal tasks outside of court cases. More specifically, AI helps by: Processing data faster: AI tackles even the largest datasets in record time so teams stay on track for tight deadlines. Plus, were not just a plug-and-play platform.
Public access to court data through automated collection of online courtrecords is a fundamental First Amendment right and it is critical to meaningful access to the United States legal system. The recent ruling in South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v.
Two top-line takeaways you might get from this post: A two-click formation process avoids the risk of judges moving the goalposts about formation, and If you are amending your TOS, have an airtight plan for building a credible evidentiary record. The court sees it differently. In re: StubHub Refund Litigation , No. 22-15879 (9th Cir.
I have met lawyers who have a crazy idea: They HAVE to read EVERY email, document, Excel file, video, and every other bit of ESI produced in discovery. Lawyers have a duty of competency to their client, and candor to the court, to look at what is relevant to their case and responsive to discovery requests. United States v.
E-discovery company DISCO announced that it has acquired two legal workflow products, Hold360 and Request360, from Congruity 360 LLC. It will integrate the products with its cloud-based e-discovery platform to enable corporate legal customers to meet legal hold obligations and legal request compliance. “The
The Court stated that litigation hold was not effectively communicated and the officers listed in the City’s initial disclosures did not acknowledge receiving the hold notice. In all, the Court noted a total of fewer than 25 emails produced from key players. The Court found that the City’s litigation hold was both late and ineffective.
E-discovery solutions , a significant part of legal tech, were estimated to be a multi-billion-dollar industry. The global e-discovery market size was projected to reach $17.32 This reduces manual labor, minimizes errors, and lowers costs associated with discovery. This enhances trust in legal documentation.
By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Step Six: 14 days after the Initial Order and payment of the second fee, the CCB issues a Scheduling Order , which includes a timeline for the respondent’s response, pre-discovery conference, discovery, post-discovery conference, written position statements, a hearing, and determination.
This helps avoid mistakes and delays in the deposition and by speeding up the process, effectively gives lawyers more time on the record to ask questions. What’s unique is that we treat certain information differently – so we capture contacts as contact records (so we can sync them on to other tools).
The Seattle-based legal tech startup Clearbrief already uses artificial intelligence to strengthen your legal writing by finding the best evidence in the record to support your arguments (or debunk your opponent’s). Using the power of generative AI, it extends that ability to a different but related purpose — the creation of case timelines.
With billions documenting their life from the banal to the audacious, these services have become a treasure trove for discovery. WebPreserver generates a certificate for authenticating this evidence in court. With the delete key a tap away, it’s vital to defensibly collect this evidence while you can.
We are often asked if we incorporate artificial intelligence (“AI”) into our legal workflows and electronic discovery processes. In e-discovery, models can be tailored to a dataset such as Continuous Active Learning (CAL). This question is not surprising given the efficiencies and cost savings associated with AI.
In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them. Do courts fully reopen or not?
What is the difference between a court clerk and a court assistant? A court clerk generally engages in specialized legal tasks, such as assisting judges in managing court proceedings, maintaining records, and handling legal documents.
It set a record by amassing 100 million monthly active users within two months (for comparison purposes, TikTok required nine months and Instagram more than two years to reach that mark). Professor Kenton Brice, director of the Donald E. The court granted an award of sanctions for $5,000. SO WHY HALLUCINATIONS?
” In Federal Court Responding Party Presumed to Bear Subpoena Costs, but Requesting Party Must Avoid Imposition of Undue Burden and Expense A case from the Northern District of Illinois provides a good analysis of when costs responding to subpoenas may be shifted to the party seeking the documents. Cardinal Growth, L.P. ,
Now, 670 courses may sound like a large number, but this number includes every e-discovery, cybersecurity, law office management, and law practice and technology course in the country. In our longitudinal study, we found that 670 technology courses were offered in the technology space. This results in an average of 3.38 candidates.
Now, 670 courses may sound like a large number, but this number includes every e-discovery, cybersecurity, law office management, and law practice and technology course in the country. In our longitudinal study, we found that 670 technology courses were offered in the technology space. This results in an average of 3.38 candidates.
We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Traction: We have done a lot of work on customer discovery and gathered a great deal of positive feedback. Founded: 11/1/2019. Built by lawyers for lawyers.
We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Traction: We have done a lot of work on customer discovery and gathered a great deal of positive feedback. Founded: 11/1/2019. Built by lawyers for lawyers.
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. See the demo video on responding to written discovery requests.) There are two primary problems – finding the information you need among all the noise and fulfilling your discovery obligations. What problem do you solve?
VoiceScript Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. See the demo video on responding to written discovery requests.) There are two primary problems – finding the information you need among all the noise and fulfilling your discovery obligations. What problem do you solve?
E-discovery professionals are on the front lines of detecting deep fakes used as evidence, according to Marathe. Marathe argues judges and lawyers also need to be heavily educated on the latest developments in deep fake technology in order to counter their use in court. Deepfakes Are Coming to Courts.
E-discovery professionals are on the front lines of detecting deep fakes used as evidence, according to Marathe. Marathe argues judges and lawyers also need to be heavily educated on the latest developments in deep fake technology in order to counter their use in court. Deepfakes Are Coming to Courts.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content