This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Why Litigation Experience Matters in a Patent Attorney One of the most overlooked but highly valuable assets in a patent attorney is litigation experience specifically, experience arguing patent cases in federal court. Final Thoughts If youre serious about protecting your innovation, dont settle for a cookie-cutter patent.
Called Litigation Footprint, it provides a visual overview of the federal and state courts across the country in which a party has litigated, derived from the litigation histories of parties in over 27 million cases filed in 94 federal district courts and over 1,300 state courts in 34 states and the District of Columbia.
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
You may be able to file an extension when things go awry in court, but Santa doesn’t get the same leniency and neither do his trusty elves. Smells Like the Best Lawyer Ever Candle Both candles and lawyers have been known to melt under a little heat though lawyers are better at keeping their cool in court!
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. Looking ahead, Schafer expects to expand ClearBrief’s features to assist paralegals along with corporate attorneys beyond litigation. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it. So Jackie, welcome to The Geek in Review.
Constandinos (Deno) Himonas, the Utah Supreme Court justice who spearheaded the state’s first-of-its-kind regulatory sandbox to license new forms of legal services and providers, is retiring from the court. Hammering away at the problem with the same tools is Einstein’s definition of insanity, he said. It hasn’t worked.”.
This tool allows law firms to analyze aggregated and normalized state trial court data to gain competitive intelligence across cases, practice areas, and performance. Collecting this unstructured data from county courts is very challenging, but provides valuable business insights. Was it 110 or 112? Go Red Raiders. Go Red Raiders.
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment.” Unsurprisingly, on remand, the district court declared the rest unconstitutional.
At the Committees last meeting in November 2024, it agreed to develop a formal proposal for a new rule which, if adopted, would become Rule 707 of the FRE that would require federal courts to apply Rule 702s standards to machine-generated evidence. State courts also are beginning to grapple with the reliability of AI generated evidence.
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the laws baffled the justices due to their sprawling nature, confusing provisions, and misguided policy assumptions. The Supreme Court unanimously agreed to send the cases back to the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits for more careful review of the plaintiffs’ facial challenges to the laws.
Last and definitely not least, we had the opportunity to catch up with my legal hero Erwin Chemerinsky, the Dean of Berkeley Law, as we discussed his topic presented at the Alexander F. If you own rental property, you should definitely tune in. CLA 2019 Annual Meeting: Litigation Section–CLE Highlights and Section Updates.
There is definitely demand for the AI Insider Program with over 3,000 law firms already signed up. He also sees opportunities to use the tools to help pro se litigants and courts. Jeff Pfeifer 16:06 Definitely. Do you have a plan for how you’re going to interact with these agencies and courts?
I wrote up a 4,000 word draft about the state court ruling, but the federal ruling came out before I finished it. I couldn’t blog just the state case without discussing the new development, so I planned to modify my blog post on the state court ruling to compare/contrast the federal ruling. It doesn’t work.
Thus, I always felt the litigation ploy acted as an adverse admission by the plaintiffs. But courts don’t always use facts like that for petard-hoisting, instead grounding their rulings in legal doctrines and admissible evidence. Yet, the court bails YouTube out. The court shreds this chart.
Defining AI for Internal Policies A Few Considerations and Tips (July 29, 2024) Companies developing internal AI policies often face challenges deciding how to define AI and, relatedly, deciding when AI governance and compliance programs should apply to models outside their chosen definition.
” Enigma challenged Malwarebytes’ classifications in court. ” Malwarebytes appealed the 9th Circuit’s ruling, first to the 9th Circuit en banc, and then to the US Supreme Court. ” Malwarebytes appealed the 9th Circuit’s ruling, first to the 9th Circuit en banc, and then to the US Supreme Court. (I
The court is unclear about how Joybuy operates, but it appears that Joybuy (via the entity JD) runs its own online marketplace. This is a rare attack on the capacious definition of a service provider, and it did not succeed. March 31, 2025) This case involves the service Joybuy, which listed items for sale in Walmart.coms marketplace.
The discovery process is a critical element of litigation, and objections to discovery requests are every bit as essential. Any legal professional working in litigation needs to know how to make these objections, and how to respond when the opposing side makes them. Response [applying federal court standard]: Objection.
Privacy concerns require forensic teams to limit collections to court-ordered data only, fostering trust in both the legal team and custodians. Key Insights: Definition and Context: Koehler began by defining linked files as paths or URLs in documents that point to other files stored on various platforms.
Legal assistants, also called litigation assistants, mainly perform ancillary work and work at the strategic and administrative levels to support the legal profession. This can include preparing or handling legal papers and even assisting an attorney in court. What does a legal assistant do?
Ryanair recently “prevailed” in its CFAA claim in its litigation against Booking.com. Not only that, but this case makes it more likely that other plaintiffs and defendants will suffer lengthy, protracted litigation to reach similarly absurd conclusions. According to this court, it is. Booking Holdings Inc.
LeadClick decision , which said: “Courts typically have held that internet service providers, website exchange systems , online message boards, and search engines fall within this definition.” ” This is the kind of argument only a pro se litigant would make in 2023. Zotos wrote the review in its entirety.
In this blog, we will delve into the distinctions between a lawyer, attorney, and litigator. They are responsible for advising clients, preparing cases, and representing them in court proceedings. Attorneys have the power to sign legal documents, negotiate settlements, and represent clients in court. What is a Litigator?
I’m sure ShutterStock would have written a $2,131 settlement check to avoid the litigation. McGucken complained about ShutterStock’s handling of specific infringing users, but ShutterStock terminated one user on the first strike and the other on the second strike and the court’s fine with that. ShutterStock.
For unclear reasons, Kelly Toys expanded the litigation to add online marketplaces Alibaba and AliExpress as defendants. Normally, SAD Scheme rightsowners don’t sue online marketplaces because that brings in well-funded and highly motivated defendants who will jack up the litigation costs substantially. This is an unusual move.
The plaintiffs lost al of the framing cases then, but here we are in 2024, still litigating framing cases. It was an audaciously mockable pivot…and yet, the district court judge shockingly bought the argument. Unfortunately, the court expresses this intuitively obvious result in a baroque, technical, and inaccessible opinion.
The court applies the standard three-part Section 230 test: ICS Provider. “Websites such as Facebook that facilitate the connection of countless online users to a common database and servers indeed qualify as interactive computer services… There is no serious question that Facebook fits this statutory definition.”
In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , Further, employers should examine their bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies to ensure that what is or is not company data is well defined according to their business, regulatory and litigation needs. In In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , 18-cv-2022 WL 972401 (D.
In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , Further, employers should examine their bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies to ensure that what is or is not company data is well defined according to their business, regulatory and litigation needs. In In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , 18-cv-2022 WL 972401 (D.
Supreme Court [FN]. Twitter won its decision unanimously, and the Supreme Court per curiam punted the Google case back to the 9th Circuit with the clear message that the plaintiffs should lose. The Supreme Court says that the term “aiding and abetting” in the statute should be interpreted using the common law.
The Court Opinion Greer was a target of one of Kiwi Farms’ attacks. The district court dismissed the contributory claim because the defendants didn’t materially contribute to the infringement. The appellate court revives the claim. The court says the defendants waived any fair use defense by briefing it inadequately.
I have been amazed at the knee-jerk and head in the sand reaction of many courts to the use of Gen AI by lawyers appearing before them and the use by judges. The Council offers definitions to clear up any misunderstanding about the tools. It states that there’s generally no need for courts to mandate disclosure of AI or Gen AI usage.
The court, however, focused on HIPAA’s explicit exemption for research purposes, which allows sharing of information to the extent that the identifiers are removed. Accordingly, the court held in favor of Google. Entities whose primary business is not related to healthcare are not included within either of the definitions.
Constandinos (Deno) Himonas, the Utah Supreme Court justice who spearheaded the state’s first-of-its-kind regulatory sandbox to license new forms of legal services and providers, is retiring from the court. Hammering away at the problem with the same tools is Einstein’s definition of insanity, he said. It hasn’t worked.”.
The court, however, focused on HIPAA’s explicit exemption for research purposes, which allows sharing of information to the extent that the identifiers are removed. Accordingly, the court held in favor of Google. Entities whose primary business is not related to healthcare are not included within either of the definitions.
Two years ago, the legal and business news company ALM launched Law.com Radar , a service of the legal news site Law.com that delivers custom-tailored news drawn from court dockets, with a unique twist — its news summaries are generated algorithmically, rather than by human editors. It later added transactional news to the mix.
The challenge was to analyze single plaintiff employment litigation cases to determine how these types of matters should be priced. In this case the client was concerned about setting an unfavorable precedent with a court loss, so a $900k fee was fine by them. I remember the first time I was assigned this task.
The “personal information” definition is amended. The current definition of personal information requires the information to be “about” an individual who is either identified or reasonably identifiable. So, what “agreed in principle” proposals are worth paying attention to? Overarching proportionality requirement.
In the latest episode of “The Geek in Review,” Marlene Gebauer hosts a fascinating conversation with Sonja Ebron and Debra Slone , the dynamic couple behind Courtroom5 , a pioneering startup in the Justice Tech space aimed at empowering pro se litigants. And so we are firmly in the Justice Tech space as it’s known. Courtroom5.
The Illinois Supreme Court Rules Committee will hold a public hearing on November 15 to hear public comment on five proposals. at the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts (222 N. at the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts (222 N. The hearing will be held at 10:30 a.m. The hearing will be held at 10:30 a.m.
LawHelp Interactive to help self-represented litigants obtain essential legal forms. LawHelpNY.org, providing legal information in New York on pro bono services, legal rights, the courts, and more. They include: The ProBono.net platform, which connects lawyers with pro bono opportunities in several way.
The court says that in some online circles, it’s used as symbolism that a stock price is headed “to the moon.” So the Court declines Cohen’s blanket rule. Securities Litigation, 2023 U.S. But like language, a symbol’s meaning may be clarified by “the context in which [the] symbol is used.” LEXIS 129613 (D.D.C.
Consistent with the CCB’s small claims court ethos, the case involved both a pro se claimant and respondent. Eric asked me: how would this have been different if the claimant had pursued the traditional route of suing in federal court? The CCB filing cost is about $300 less than federal court. Here’s the odd part.
LinkedIn case, which up until now was the most important case in the history of US web-scraping litigation. The Delaware court stayed proceedings pending the California action. First, the court found that there was no evidence of logged-in scraping in the record. According to the court: The U.S. Meta sued in California.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content