This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In March 2023, Meta Platforms lost a class action lawsuit against the Dutch Data Privacy Stichting in an Amsterdam court, acting in conjunction with the Consumentenbond, the Dutch Consumers’ Association. Thus, investigating the issue of processing sensitive data for advertising purposes, the court determined in paragraph 13.14
India’s Digital Personal DataProtection Bill 2023 was introduced in Parliament on 3 August 2023. Once passed, the law will govern how businesses collect and use individuals’ data. What data is covered? Personal data, i.e., data about an individual that can identify them. What else should fiduciaries do? (a)
million fine against Austrian Post for channelling electronic dataprotection-related inquiries to a web form and not offering an additional email address, irrespective of the data subject option to also use non-electronic postal mail or customer service.
There were a few European dataprotection developments in February that companies may want to have on their radar. What happened: CNIL has reminded businesses to audit their use of cookies and tracking technologies, ahead of the regulator’s October 2020 guidance coming into force at the end of March.
As covered in our Annual Review , 2020 was a blockbuster year for European dataprotection. This was bolstered by the ICO’s announcement that it is resuming investigations into real time bidding and the adtech industry that were paused in May 2020 due to COVID-19. EDPB publishes new data breach notification guidance.
Our top five European dataprotection developments from June are: Non-material damage under GDPR: The CJEU clarified the scope of compensation for non-material damage in the context of identity theft and data subjects’ fear that their personal data had been exposed. These developments, and more, are covered below.
At the same time, the rapid evolution of remote work over the past few years has dramatically changed how we think about work rhythms and workflows. Therefore, a logical question arises: what should an employer know about the use of personnel monitoring tools in order not to violate the requirements of personal dataprotection legislation?
In this post, we look back at the 2020 European dataprotection landscape and five trends that help companies understand not only where we are, but where dataprotection enforcement, litigation, and practice may be headed. million against Marriott for its 2018 data breach When you dig deeper though, two key points emerge.
Here are our highlights: European Commission adopts new Standard Contractual Clauses What happened : As reported in our blog post , the European Commission adopted its new Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) for the cross-border transfer of personal data from the EEA to “third countries”. What to do : For now, nothing.
Clients seek timely, high-quality legal services with clear communication, while attorneys and law firm administrators navigate evolving regulations, intricate trust accounting rules, and stringent data security requirements. Without a system that centralizes these processes, confusion and avoidable errors compound over time.
Businesses may want to consider how the courts reasoning may apply to other circumstances when dealing with disclosure requests. With the Act still yet finalised and with lead in times of six or more months for key obligations once it is, several authorities in the EU, the UK and the U.S. These developments, and more, covered below.
Dataprotection & AI: In particular: (i) the French CNIL published its first set of guidance on GDPR compliance when developing AI tools; and (ii) the UK ICO issued a preliminary enforcement notice against Snap over its AI chatbot, alleging that Snap had not adequately assessed the privacy risks posed to child users of the tool.
GDPR one-stop-shop: Businesses wishing to take advantage of the GDPR one-stop-shop system should take note of a new digest, published by the European DataProtection Board, which analyses the decisions made by so-called Lead Supervisory Authorities in this context.
Relatedly, a Swedish Court upheld the Swedish IMY’s 2022 reprimand of Klarna Bank AB for failing to disclose information regarding the specific recipients of personal data to a requesting data subject; providing the categories of recipients only was insufficient.
. : Business may want to revisit their cross-border data transfer arrangements following the new adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, assess whether they are eligible to self-certify and, if they are, whether it makes sense to. Data Privacy Framework (the “DPF”). Data Privacy Framework (the “DPF”).
We also saw developments in the courts on when companies will be liable to pay individuals damages for GDPR violations and the German anti-trust regulator using its new enforcement powers. This follows a February 2021 reference by the German courts to the CJEU on whether the GDPR imposes a materiality threshold for damages claims.
Businesses spend significant time, money and effort negotiating that most-common of contracts – the non-disclosure agreement. The first time someone uses AutoNDA, it takes just a few moments for them to complete the initial set up. The method of dispute resolution – court or arbitration – and jurisdiction.
Believe it or not, it’s still about data. But today we’re focusing on how firms can do the best job possible to protect theirs and their clients. Law firms spend a great deal of time and money on security measures. I would say, you know, as an attorney and legal innovation evangelist, I like to describe myself at times.
Legal software is technology specifically designed to assist legal professionals in managing the various aspects of their work – document management, case management, timetracking, billing, and more. Case management software: Manages and tracks the details of legal cases, including key dates, contacts, and case-related documents.
Data security and compliance: Legal intake software systems must prioritize data security and compliance with legal regulations, such as client confidentiality requirements outlined by bar associations or dataprotection laws. What is the Purpose of an Intake Software?
Keynote highlights Judge Victoria Pratt With her extensive experience as Chief Judge of Newark Municipal Court in New Jersey, Judge Victoria Pratt offered Clio Con attendees profound insights into delivering justice. James Clear James Clear delivered an engaging presentation focused on the transformative power of habits.
It is important to note that there exist regulations developing specific sectors such as HIPAA in healthcare , PCI DSS security in payment cards, Protection of personal data in EU GDPR , and Protection of consumer privacy in Californias CCPA. What is Data Compliance? Why is Data Compliance Important?
But nobody likes being tracked through their pet’s TikTok account. Recently, it was revealed that a few ByteDance employees tracked a cat’s TikTok account to find the IP address of its owner – who is a reporter for the Financial Times covering TikTok. The failed tracking efforts were meant to find a leak in the company.
Understanding Advanced eDiscovery’s Function in Contemporary Legal Practice In the age of digitization, there has been a radical change in the way that evidence is gathered, handled, and examined in the court system. Nowadays, law firms must deal with enormous volumes of electronic data, much of which may be pertinent to their cases.
When it comes to keeping track of contacts, Office 365 offers the following tools: Bookings — to track meetings and schedule client appointments Connections — build, manage, and track contacts for campaigns, etc. Data Security and Compliance: The legal profession demands the utmost confidentiality and data security.
When it comes to keeping track of contacts, Office 365 offers the following tools: Bookings — to track meetings and schedule client appointments Connections — build, manage, and track contacts for campaigns, etc. Data Security and Compliance: The legal profession demands the utmost confidentiality and data security.
Automation of Routine Tasks : Legal professionals often find themselves burdened with repetitive and automated time-consuming tasks. Legal departments can save valuable time and allocate their resources to more strategic and high-value work. Furthermore, update these systems in real-time.
Ensuring adherence to diverse regulatory frameworks, including privacy laws, dataprotection regulations, and industry-specific compliance standards, demands considerable resources and expertise. This includes client contacts, case files, court dates, deadlines, tasks, and relevant documents.
Ensuring adherence to diverse regulatory frameworks, including privacy laws, dataprotection regulations, and industry-specific compliance standards, demands considerable resources and expertise. This includes client contacts, case files, court dates, deadlines, tasks, and relevant documents.
This saves their valuable time and effort. This enables attorneys to work together in real-time on documents and case files. These technologies save lawyers time and effort, allowing them to focus on higher-value strategic tasks. Video conferencing, online document signing, and virtual court hearings have become commonplace.
Businesses spend significant time, money and effort negotiating that most-common of contracts – the non-disclosure agreement. The first time someone uses AutoNDA, it takes just a few moments for them to complete the initial set up. The method of dispute resolution – court or arbitration – and jurisdiction.
It automates the time-consuming process of document review and due diligence. Cloud Computing and Data Security Remote Work and Collaboration: Cloud-based solutions like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace allow legal professionals to work seamlessly from anywhere with an internet connection.
Marketing: In the retail context, facial recognition or “facial detection” technologies can scan shoppers for features such as age, gender, and mood—then deliver tailored advertisements in real time. Particularly scrutinized is the use of “real-time” facial recognition to scan crowds in public places, such as marches and protests.
This intake form typically includes detailed questions about an accident or injury, such as the date, time, and location of the incident, the nature of the injuries sustained, medical treatment received, insurance information, and potential witnesses. Family law intake form. Estate planning intake form. Accessible. Collaborative.
Believe it or not, it’s still about data. But today we’re focusing on how firms can do the best job possible to protect theirs and their clients. Law firms spend a great deal of time and money on security measures. I would say, you know, as an attorney and legal innovation evangelist, I like to describe myself at times.
The possibilities of modern marketing would hardly be so advanced if web analytics services did not exist – tools that allow you to track website visitors’ behavior, collect and process statistics. The proceedings culminated in the EU Court of Justice judgment dated 06.10.2015 in case No. It happened a few years ago. 12.333 (E.O.
Here are some of the key reasons law firms should invest in technology: Increased Efficiency: Using legal technology to automate tasks that consume much of a lawyer’s time. At the same time, AI-powered legal research tools can reduce the required time and expense of using conventional research techniques.
Recent Data Minimization Enforcement Actions In January 2022, the New York Attorney General (“NYAG”) reached a $600,000 settlement with EyeMed related to a 2020 data breach in which attackers gained access to an EyeMed email account that contained sensitive customer data for a period of six years. The companies agreed to pay $1.5
Here are some of the key reasons law firms should invest in technology: Increased Efficiency: Using legal technology to automate tasks that consume much of a lawyer’s time. At the same time, AI-powered legal research tools can reduce the required time and expense of using conventional research techniques.
And second, even if the model can be completely cleansed of the tainted data, should the appropriate remedy for the data violation include destruction of the model? International & Kurbo On March 3, 2022, the FTC reached a court-approved settlement with Kurbo, Inc. This is an important course correction.”
So what we know at the moment we see in the US courts, the discussion if Facebook and Instagram and WhatsApp has to be broken up. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice. One idea is the idea of data portability. And that is the basic idea of data portability. This is the ultimate sanction.
So what we know at the moment we see in the US courts, the discussion if Facebook and Instagram and WhatsApp has to be broken up. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice. One idea is the idea of data portability. And that is the basic idea of data portability. This is the ultimate sanction.
In that position, he helped organize oversight hearings on mobile location tracking and biometric privacy. As a general rule, however, the FTC’s Division of Privacy and Identity Protection (the “DPIP”) initiates privacy and cybersecurity investigations via civil investigative demands (“CIDs”). 18] In FTC v. Shire ViroPharma, Inc. ,
To underscore these risks, DOJ cited real-world cases of unregulated access to sensitive data. Investigators demonstrated vulnerabilities by purchasing digital advertising data from brokers to track U.S. Alleged violators may seek additional judicial review in federal district court. This rule implements E.O.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content