This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
privacy legislation, is now addressing these technologies with a new set of proposed rules by the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA). The European Unions General DataProtection Regulation (GDPR) , particularly Article 22 , addresses similar concerns by regulating decisions made solely through automated processing.
Representative actions: In light of the CJEU ruling that a violation of the controller’s information obligations can be subject to a representative action, businesses should consider the potentially increased risk of litigation following GDPR breach allegations and how to respond.
UK DPA launches data transfer consultation What happened : The ICO launched a consultation covering its international data transfer guidance, draft transfer risk assessment tool (“TRA”) and draft international data transfer agreement (“ IDTA ”). These developments, and more, covered below.
In this post, we look back at the 2020 European dataprotection landscape and five trends that help companies understand not only where we are, but where dataprotection enforcement, litigation, and practice may be headed. Second , enforcement goes far beyond data breaches and the GDPR. million and £99.2
There were a few European dataprotection developments in February that companies may want to have on their radar. Spotlight on Schrems II litigation and enforcement risk. (and and other third countries) may want to ensure that their review of cross-border data transfers post- Schrems II is progressing.
Here are our highlights: European Commission adopts new Standard Contractual Clauses What happened : As reported in our blog post , the European Commission adopted its new Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) for the cross-border transfer of personal data from the EEA to “third countries”.
The key development from April must be the European DataProtection Board (“EDPB”) approving the draft UK adequacy decisions from the European Commission (the “Commission”). Companies will be relieved that they are one step closer towards maintaining the seamless flow of data between the EU and the UK.
ICO targets the data broking industry : On 27 October, the ICO demanded that Experian make sweeping changes to dataprotection practices within its direct marketing business within three months or face further enforcement action. We will continue to report on developments as Experian’s appeal progresses.
Recently, we have already talked about the difficulties faced by the tech giant Meta Platforms with European supervisory authorities (Irish DPC, European EDPB) and the prospects for further litigation regarding the illegal processing of users’ personal data, in particular, class actions. of the Dutch Telecommunications Act.
A wave of state legislation with dataprotection requirements places new obligations on businesses and public institutions. Supreme Court rulings have found that the First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth amendments of the Constitution contain a right to privacy. The history of privacy law The roots of privacy law in the U.S.
On March 2, 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) decided, in case C-268/21 , that the GDPR applies to the production of evidence in civil court proceedings. The case sets limits on, but does not preclude, the production of personal data in court proceedings.
If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. Companies must also foot the bill for consumer data requests authorized under privacy regulations unless the request is “excessive.” 11 cv 4071 (N.D.
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment.” Unsurprisingly, on remand, the district court declared the rest unconstitutional.
With this regard, it is essential to know about the privacy legislation of this country since, nowadays, most internet businesses process the personal data of their clients, and they should do it in compliance with dataprotection laws. ” Thus, the Australian Privacy Act also aims to have a GDPR level of dataprotection.
In the latest of a recent string of judicial rebukes, the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Axon Enterprise, Inc. Historically, courts have been reluctant to permit immediate challenges to investigations and adjudications without forcing the targets to wait for the resolution of all agency proceedings. District Court.
On October 26, 2023, the European Court of Justice (“CJEU”) decided that the GDPR grants a patient the right to obtain a copy of his or her medical record free of charge ( case C-307/22, FT v DW ). The scope of GDPR’s right of access (see our blog posts here and here ) has been heavily litigated both at EU and national level.
By Rick Clark and Jacob Hesse 2023 was an eventful year in the world of legal technology, with new technology emerging to address both traditional and new challenges legal teams face when collecting, processing, and reviewing data for litigation, investigations, or public access requests.
Reveal , a global provider of e-discovery technology, announced the release of Reveal 11, which it said is a major enhancement to its AI-powered on-premise and SaaS platform, which can be used to support litigation, investigations, compliance, antitrust, data privacy and other matters. Reynen Court Raises $4.3M
The article entitled “Facebook Opposes Irish Data Watchdog’s 265-Million-Euro Fine” ( [link] ) included these comments about Facebook challenge in Irish Court: A High Court justice granted Facebook permission to pursue litigation over the fine from the Irish DataProtection Commission, reported The Irish Times on Monday.
Collective action proceedings may be brought before national courts by qualified entities designated by their member state, who may seek injunctive relief and/or redress measures, including compensatory relief, reimbursement for damage, price reductions and/or product repairs, on behalf of consumers. Information about collective actions.
Whether corresponding with colleagues, communicating with clients, or staying up-to-date with court notifications, lawyers’ email inboxes are brimming with a near-constant stream of messages—it can be seriously overwhelming. How do you organize emails for litigation? Email is central to any legal professional’s day. Compliance.
6, 2018, the Article 29 Working Party (Working Party 29) published Working Paper 261 (WP 261), which provided guidance on the provisions of Article 49 of the European Union’s (EU) General DataProtection Regulation (GDPR).
Overview In a much anticipated decision, the UK Supreme Court has unanimously decided that a mass claim brought against Google by Mr Richard Lloyd, on behalf of a class that could include as many as 4.4 million iPhone users (the “iPhone Users”), cannot proceed, as currently constituted, as a ‘representative action’ in the English courts.
The second session I attended was the breakout session Data Privacy in the Age of Digital Transformation – Harnessing the Benefits of AI in Information Governance and DataProtection. Plaintiffs asked the Court to enter default judgment against the City, or, in the alternative, for an adverse-inference instruction.
Understanding Advanced eDiscovery’s Function in Contemporary Legal Practice In the age of digitization, there has been a radical change in the way that evidence is gathered, handled, and examined in the court system. Nowadays, law firms must deal with enormous volumes of electronic data, much of which may be pertinent to their cases.
Why is Data Compliance Important? Failure to adhere to the security framework regarding dataprotection can lead to high fines and even court cases. There is a good level of customer data compliance that prevents unauthorized access or alteration to sensitive information.
10-201 or MLATs) or letters rogatory to access data stored overseas. Microsoft litigation, in which Microsoft had argued that it was not required to provide access to its users’ private data stored on Dublin servers. Supreme Court heard argument on the case in February 2018. The CLOUD Act was occasioned by the U.S.
The Fourth Circuit made clear that trial courts must consider the import of class-action waivers signed by putative class members before certifying class actions against a Defendant. While this lawsuit arose as a result of a data breach, all companies transacting business on the internet are potentially liable to class action claims.
Regulatory Requirements to Get Rid of Old DataData-minimization laws generally provide that nonpublic data should be kept until it is no longer needed either for legitimate business purposes or legal reasons, such as a pending litigation or a regulatory requirement. Anonymizing Data after One Year.
E-Discovery and Digital Forensics: Electronic discovery (e-discovery) has become a crucial aspect of modern litigation. With the exponential growth of digital data, legal proceedings often involve vast amounts of electronically stored information (ESI). Virtual law offices enable lawyers to offer their services online.
Litigation software: Provides access to legal databases, statutes, case law, and other legal resources to aid in research. Legal calendaring software: Focuses on managing deadlines and important dates, helping to avoid missed court dates and filing deadlines.
The European DataProtection Board (“EDPB”) recently published new guidance on how companies can validly transfer EU personal data to the many countries that have not been deemed by the EU Commission to generally provide an adequate level of dataprotection – most notably the U.S. (so
Data Analytics and Predictive Insights : Legal technology solutions are increasingly leveraging the power of data analytics and artificial intelligence. By analyzing vast amounts of legal data, including case law, court rulings, and historical litigation outcomes.
E-Discovery and Document Management Electronic Discovery: E-discovery platforms such as RelativityOne and Everlaw automate the identification, collection, and analysis of electronic documents during litigation. These insights assist attorneys in making data-driven decisions.
In this Debevoise Data Blog post, we discuss several new laws focused on ADM that are either in effect today or will go into effect in 2023, as well as circumstances in which litigants have used these laws to challenge companies’ uses of ADM tools.
Despite initial restrictions, like those imposed by US District Court judges and law schools like Berkeley and the University of Michigan, legal tech evangelist Nicole Black argues that these technologies should be embraced as valuable tools to streamline work and increase efficiencies. is from the 9th Circuit Court, 'Johnson v.
These include dataprotection laws that dictate how personal data must be kept, rules of civil procedure that control the discovery process, and industry-specific regulations that impose extra data management responsibilities. Scalability includes the capacity of the service to manage increasing data complexity.
These include dataprotection laws that dictate how personal data must be kept, rules of civil procedure that control the discovery process, and industry-specific regulations that impose extra data management responsibilities. Scalability includes the capacity of the service to manage increasing data complexity.
Legal Considerations When Using AI Voice Analytics As the market for voice analytics grows and the applications proliferate, so do litigation risks and regulatory scrutiny. For example, the DataProtection Authority in Hungary recently fined a bank close to €700,000 for using AI voice analytics in its call centers.
When they do, companies may want to play close attention to the European DataProtection Board’s (“EDPB”) final guidance on supplementary measures that can be combined with the SCCs (and other transfer mechanisms) to ensure “essential equivalence” where laws in the receiving jurisdiction might impinge on the protections the SCCs give.
The TDPA provides for a private right of action for violation of the prohibition to sell, lease, or disclose data. Compensatory damages or damages between $200 and $1,000 are authorized for each unlawful sale, as are reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs. See Vance v. Amazon.com Inc. , C20-1084JLR, 2021 WL 1401633, at *2 (W.D.
Ensuring adherence to diverse regulatory frameworks, including privacy laws, dataprotection regulations, and industry-specific compliance standards, demands considerable resources and expertise. This includes client contacts, case files, court dates, deadlines, tasks, and relevant documents.
Ensuring adherence to diverse regulatory frameworks, including privacy laws, dataprotection regulations, and industry-specific compliance standards, demands considerable resources and expertise. This includes client contacts, case files, court dates, deadlines, tasks, and relevant documents.
Among their targets were the DataProtection Impact Assessment requirements, which NetChoice argued amounted to prior restraint and compelled speech. The District Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in the Bonta case on July 27th. I will reiterate some of the major lowlights in this post.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content