This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The governing law should a dispute arise. The method of disputeresolution – court or arbitration – and jurisdiction. Already, the oneNDA organization has developed a oneNDA module specific to M&A matters, and it has also launched oneDPA for standardizing dataprotection agreements.
The governing law should a dispute arise. The method of disputeresolution – court or arbitration – and jurisdiction. Already, the oneNDA organization has developed a oneNDA module specific to M&A matters, and it has also launched oneDPA for standardizing dataprotection agreements.
The big news this November was the European DataProtection Board (the “EDPB”) issuing its highly anticipated post- Schrems II data transfer guidance, followed just a day later by the European Commission’s draft updated Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) (see our blog post here ). Bonn Regional Court slashes Telco’s €9.55
Blockbuster with the North Carolina Supreme Court decision in Canteen v. That left the majority’s discussion on the constitutionality of content moderation, which provides a modern Supreme Court take regarding the tsunami of censorship laws heading for the Supreme Court. I replaced Harris v. The Harris v. Falwell (4th Cir.)
European DataProtection Roundup – July Key takeaways from developments this July include: a blockbuster €746 million fine against Amazon – the largest ever GDPR penalty – showing the Regulation’s teeth; the challenges of GDPR-compliant facial recognition, after a Spanish supermarket chain was fined €2.5
Improved DataProtection: Law firms are increasingly concerned about data security since technology is used more frequently. Lawyers who keep up with legal technology trends can implement best practices and tools to protect their clients’ data and maintain confidentiality.
As we covered here , last October, the CNIL fined Clearview AI €20 million for various dataprotection violations, including “intrusive and massive” data processing without consent or a valid legitimate interest. The amount of compensation should be assessed by Member State courts under their domestic rules.
Improved DataProtection: Law firms are increasingly concerned about data security since technology is used more frequently. Lawyers who keep up with legal technology trends can implement best practices and tools to protect their clients’ data and maintain confidentiality.
Data Privacy Framework (the “DPF”). The decision enables businesses in Europe to transfer personal data to DPF-certified U.S. businesses without having to implement additional dataprotection safeguards. The DPF is the third U.S. adequacy decision in recent years. billion fine for Meta in May 2023).
And yet…the Roommates.com opinion has waned in importance over the years, especially as courts have mostly cited it for the defense and thus merged it into mainstream defense-favorable Section 230 jurisprudence. Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations Overview of the E.U.’s 1125 [[link] and 15 U.S.C.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content