Global LegalTech Hub
JANUARY 27, 2021
And although there are many developments and experiments around ‘automatic judges’, we consider it improbable that Artificial Intelligence - no matter how trained it may be - allows us to dispense with the threshold of the legal criterion, proper and exclusive to human intelligence. But they do not address compliance as a whole.
Clio
DECEMBER 11, 2024
When people feel that theyve been treated fairly and with respect during decision-making, trust, and compliance are built. As Judge Pratt explained at the Clio Cloud Conference, technology has the potential to increase access to justice, especially when it comes to underserved communities. How is technology aiding the justice system?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Legal Talk Network
OCTOBER 31, 2019
In fact, this year’s annual meeting marked some major milestones as the CLA fully peeled away from the prior management of the State Bar of California in compliance with SB36 put into place January 1, 2018. . Hosted by Maria Sager with guests Judge Sharon Velzy, Randy Pollak, and Jack Goodchild}. Peterson and Anna Liu}.
Legal Talk Network
JUNE 27, 2024
Their role involves assisting individuals and entities in the industry with navigating complex startup procedures, transactional and compliance requirements, extensive licensing processes, and other related challenges, making them a crucial part of this rapidly growing industry. and advising them to “take the bull by the horns.”
Justia Legal Marketing & Technology blog
OCTOBER 13, 2023
The Court consists of 15 judges, who are elected to nine-year terms by the General Assembly and the Security Council. Enforcing compliance with those principles can be even more difficult. It also provides a separate discussion on the International Court of Justice , which emerged from the San Francisco Conference as well.
Eric Goldman
NOVEMBER 16, 2024
Thus, the court summarizes: “Its compliance system may have been imperfect and its conduct negligent, but Defendant did not act recklessly.” ” [The $2,500 amount was suggested by the presiding judge at a settlement conference, which the defendant turned into an offer of judgment.]
LawSites
FEBRUARY 22, 2024
As to that last point, the court, in an opinion written by Presiding Judge Kurt S. Appellant submitted the Appellate Brief in his name and certified its compliance with [the court’s rules] as a self-represented person. In reviewing the memoranda, Judge Brian A. ” For that, it made him pay the price.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content