Remove Case predictions Remove Court Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

In Major Platform Update, Fastcase Adds Analytics Tracking Motion Grants and Timelines in Federal Courts

LawSites

A future release will expand these analytics to state courts, Fastcase says. “These analytics, across every case type in federal courts, for the first time allow lawyers to understand the likelihood of success across broad ranges of pleadings and motions before different judges,” Fastcase says.

article thumbnail

Integration Between Docket Alarm and Courtroom Insight Connects 500M Litigation Documents to Judge and Expert Witness Profiles

LawSites

A new integration between two litigation-focused legal technology products connects more than 500 million federal and state litigation dockets and documents with a database of expert witness and judicial profiles, with the aim of helping lawyers better evaluate expert witnesses.

Judge 52
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Record Label Sends Bogus Takedown Notice, Defeats 512(f) Claim Anyway–White v. UMG

Eric Goldman

The court says that White, the plaintiff, never showed that UMG was aware of his non-exclusive license, but was that required? White got past a motion to dismiss, but his case predictably falls on summary judgment. did not infringe its copyright” and ends the case. Chen * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Moonbug v.

article thumbnail

Copyright Battles Over City Council Videos

Eric Goldman

Both cases included a 512(f) claim, and both 512(f) claims survive the preliminary dismissal efforts. 14, 2024) A magistrate judge recommends sending a 512(f) case to trial. On the core scienter point, the court says: “Inquiry into the credibility of Kilgore’s asserted subjective belief is appropriate for trial.”

Court 40
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2023 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Eric Goldman

And yet…the Roommates.com opinion has waned in importance over the years, especially as courts have mostly cited it for the defense and thus merged it into mainstream defense-favorable Section 230 jurisprudence. I felt like the students would benefit from seeing for themselves what the case does and doesn’t stand for.