This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Justis emphasized that focusing on user needs, ethics, and change management will be key for successfully implementing AI. Looking ahead, Justis anticipated continuing progress in legalAI, regulatory changes, a focus on ethics, growing demand for AI skills, and AI becoming a competitive advantage for some firms.
They co-authored a paper on subtle errors in legalAI. Dedicated roles like prompt engineers are emerging to interface between law and technology. Travers Smith is exploring AI for tasks like contract review but not yet for work product. And we potentially contaminate caselaw. They continue to do that.
I recently had a chance to hear Richard Susskind speak on AI in law and, as always, found his comments perceptive and spot on. Susskind spoke as part of a series of lectures entitled Legal Tech Essentials 2022. Says Leann Blanchfield, head of Primary Law, Editorial, Thomson Reuters. “To
Lachance has additional goals for using AI within Jurisage’s data, but he’s focused tools like MyJr establishing trust with those using it for researching Canadian, and soon US caselaw. The MyJr product works as a browser extension and identifies Canadian and US caselaw citations on any web page.
And while I think some of the most exciting use cases for this technology is uploading your own documents, right, we were talking before we started about, you know, pointing it at all of the documents in your litigation, the transcripts, the correspondence, discovery, etc. We’d love to hear from you. It was tough.
They co-authored a paper on subtle errors in legalAI. Dedicated roles like prompt engineers are emerging to interface between law and technology. Travers Smith is exploring AI for tasks like contract review but not yet for work product. And we potentially contaminate caselaw. They continue to do that.
Justis emphasized that focusing on user needs, ethics, and change management will be key for successfully implementing AI. Looking ahead, Justis anticipated continuing progress in legalAI, regulatory changes, a focus on ethics, growing demand for AI skills, and AI becoming a competitive advantage for some firms.
And while I think some of the most exciting use cases for this technology is uploading your own documents, right, we were talking before we started about, you know, pointing it at all of the documents in your litigation, the transcripts, the correspondence, discovery, etc. We’d love to hear from you. It was tough.
Most legal tech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. Caselaw books waiting to be scanned. Harvard would contribute the law books and run the scanning process inside the law library.
It also improves access to justice for society as lawyers can handle more cases, as well as remove some bias from the legal system through fact-first drafting. Casetext, Spellbook, EvenUp, DoNotPay.com, Harvey.ai, Filevine, ailawyer.pro, Lexis, Westlaw, amto.ai, Better Legal, Paxton LegalAI. Harvey, Casetext.
Most legal tech startups make bold declarations about public interest, access to justice and democratizing the law when it suits them. Caselaw books waiting to be scanned. Harvard would contribute the law books and run the scanning process inside the law library.
It also improves access to justice for society as lawyers can handle more cases, as well as remove some bias from the legal system through fact-first drafting. Casetext, Spellbook, EvenUp, DoNotPay.com, Harvey.ai, Filevine, ailawyer.pro, Lexis, Westlaw, amto.ai, Better Legal, Paxton LegalAI. Harvey, Casetext.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content