This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Koerner Endowed Professor of Law, Tulane University Law School [See part 1 about defendant opt-outs and part 2 about defendant defaults.] Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down.
With one click, lawyers can securely send files to a shared exhibit portal where all participants are updated instantly. In the background, the system marks the exhibits, appropriately updates filenames, applies electronic stamps, and organizes your files. How it works: Agree to negotiate a resolution.
Technology can automate routine tasks such as document review, legal research, and timekeeping, allowing lawyers to focus on more complex legal work by utilizing document management software, legal research databases, and e-discovery software. This can help firms to work more efficiently and increase billable hours.
Technology can automate routine tasks such as document review, legal research, and timekeeping, allowing lawyers to focus on more complex legal work by utilizing document management software, legal research databases, and e-discovery software. This can help firms to work more efficiently and increase billable hours.
In fact, we are only weeks away (as of the date of filing this application) from actually reaching this audacious goal. This achievement has of course been enabled by others who believe that the law should be accessible. Finally, we plan to build integrations with e-discovery and practice management products. Harvey, Casetext.
In fact, we are only weeks away (as of the date of filing this application) from actually reaching this audacious goal. This achievement has of course been enabled by others who believe that the law should be accessible. Finally, we plan to build integrations with e-discovery and practice management products. Harvey, Casetext.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content