This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
LexisNexis announced the acquisition of CaseLaw Analytics , a French legaltech company specializing in the modeling of legal risk using artificial intelligence. The solution makes it possible to simulate the possible outcomes of litigation proceedings in more than twenty legal areas covering civil law, business law, social law.
Predictive analytics for law firms is the use of AI and other digital technology to predict the likelihood of outcomes in legal proceedings. These predictions are based on analysis of large datasets, often including judicial decisions, court filings, caselaw, and other legal data.
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
law to add supporting caselaw. In the legal field, this can manifest as fabricated caselaw, incorrect citations, or misleading summaries of legal principles. Being honest and forthcoming about the use of AI in generating the case citations; ?Paying Mr. Ayala had uploaded the motion onto MX2.law
Here, we explore essential aspects of filing a motion for change of venue and cover legal justifications, procedural steps, common challenges, and notable case examples. Are you a busy litigator constantly on the move? With Clio Manage, you can access case details, manage documents, and stay connected with clients from anywhere.
That began to change in 2016 with the enactment of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, which gave rise to a new area of litigation and an evolving body of common law pertaining to protection of trade secrets, Londergan said. This involves identifying a company’s trade secret assets. Who has access to the trade secret?
The caselaw in the Ninth Circuit — the other appellate circuit central to developing copyright law, especially regarding new technologies — seems to support the Seventh Circuit’s majority approach. However, it was sometimes not as clear as the caselaw of other circuits. A third approach?
Companies should review and test their website and application code, as well as cloud configurations, to defend against misconfigurations potentially resulting in inadvertent data exposure. The Defendant has filed a second motion to dismiss following the Plaintiff’s filing of a second amended complaint. In Vennerholm v.
Neither Time nor BuzzFeed was named as a defendant. The legislative history also expressed an intent to retain existing caselaw on vicarious liability of a principal for the acts of its agents, including independent contractors. 2021), for example, the defendant purchased a website from another party. 94-1476, at 159-60.
In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , Further, employers should examine their bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies to ensure that what is or is not company data is well defined according to their business, regulatory and litigation needs. In In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , 18-cv-2022 WL 972401 (D. Link to District Circuit Decision
In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , Further, employers should examine their bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies to ensure that what is or is not company data is well defined according to their business, regulatory and litigation needs. In In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , 18-cv-2022 WL 972401 (D. Link to District Circuit Decision
For any lawyer defending a client in a lawsuit, they require the ability to utilize a powerful tool in their arsenal–the motion to dismiss. By seeking to dismiss a case early in the litigation, you can potentially prevail without the trouble of full-blown discovery and a trial. What is a motion to dismiss? In some U.S.
It’s that every new case related to the law of copyright preemption of contracts leaves lawyers with a potential new set of arguments to defend or argue against with the law of copyright preemption. If nothing else, litigants know where they stand in these jurisdictions. were web scraping cases. Verio, Inc.
Koerner Endowed Professor of Law, Tulane University Law School [See part 1 about defendant opt-outs and part 2 about defendant defaults.] This was a declaration for the CCB Case, dated 1/10/2023. Other cases where Oppenheimer has been a litigant show that he has some licensing history, however minimal.
That began to change in 2016 with the enactment of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, which gave rise to a new area of litigation and an evolving body of common law pertaining to protection of trade secrets, Londergan said. This involves identifying a company’s trade secret assets. Who has access to the trade secret?
Motion practice shapes the case, and if you want to handle your cases more professionally, understanding motion practice is essential. Legal motion management is an essential aspect of the litigation process. Legal motions allow parties to assert their rights, and seek relief from the court regarding certain cases.
The court also struck out the claimant’s negligence claim on the grounds that: (i) caselaw has established that negligence cannot be pleaded alongside Data Protection Act claims; and (ii) “distress” does not constitute damage, as required for a successful negligence claim. Deliveroo fined €2.5
VoiceScript Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative? Anything else?
This week we have Damien Riehl , VP, Litigation Workflow and Analytics Content at FastCase, and one of the drivers behind SALI (Standards Advancement for for the Legal Industry.) Damien is the Vice-President of Litigation Workflow and Analytics content and part of the leadership at SALI. And then I litigate the patent.
He also sees potential for AI assistance to pro se litigants to promote fairer outcomes. For judges, AI could help manage pro se cases and expedite decision-making. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators? Is California law better or as New York law better do nothing or heard of analysis?
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
He also sees potential for AI assistance to pro se litigants to promote fairer outcomes. For judges, AI could help manage pro se cases and expedite decision-making. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators? Is California law better or as New York law better do nothing or heard of analysis?
To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s caselaw concerning the fair-use doctrine. But in any event, AWF’s aggressive, take-no-prisoners approach made a friendly settlement all but impossible.
In any case, Lerner & Rowe cited a case from 2000 on this factor, and the court swats it away as outdated (“that may have been true over twenty years ago when internet advertising was new”). The defendant displayed its own trademark in the ad copy, not the plaintiff’s, so the marks were dissimilar.
Despite these developments, she pressed on with her litigation. Her parallel state court litigation gets an equally chilly reception. The state appellate court treats this case as an easy Section 230 dismissal. Rutenberg can now scratch her Trump itch at Truth Social, plus Musk has invited Trump back to Twitter.
You would recognize several of the defendants’ names as frequent sources of misinformation and lies. ” That interpretation of Section 230 is obviously wrong, and the appeals court simply replies that “caselaw from other jurisdictions is uniformly to the contrary.” Rosenthal , and Zeran v.
I’m still blogging Section 230 cases as I see them, even though these posts are likely to have only historical value. ] * * * The court summarizes the horrifying allegations: In April 2022, Defendant Bendjy Charles (“Charles”) and Romelus raped Plaintiff. Is OnlyFans an ICP?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content