This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
While AI promises efficiency and cost savings, a recent case in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of including unverified AI-generated content in court filings. The court discovered that eight of those cases did not exist. Walmart Inc. &
In the intricate realm of patent litigation, the choice of legal representation can significantly influence the outcome of a case. While you want your patent lawyer to zealously represent your interests in court, having a lawyer who is too aggressive can backfire spectacularly. Brett Trout In a word, yes.
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. She believes empowering the next generation of legal professionals with AI will modernize law practice to better serve unmet needs. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it. So Jackie, welcome to The Geek in Review.
Our discussion explored recent caselaw, evolving trends, and best practices to stay ahead of the curve. Courts are increasingly scrutinizing the authenticity of social media evidence, especially as deepfakes and manipulated content become more prevalent. One of the most eye-opening discussions was around the Rossbach v.
Here, we explore essential aspects of filing a motion for change of venue and cover legal justifications, procedural steps, common challenges, and notable case examples. Are you a busy litigator constantly on the move? With Clio Manage, you can access case details, manage documents, and stay connected with clients from anywhere.
Key Takeaway: Under New York law, the attorney-client privilege applies to advice from counsel regarding general legal subjects, even when unsolicited and there is no anticipated litigation or pending action. According to New York state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, the answer is unequivocally “yes.” & Cmty.
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof.
Privacy concerns require forensic teams to limit collections to court-ordered data only, fostering trust in both the legal team and custodians. Navigating Privacy Laws: Amaral outlined new state-level privacy laws passed in 20 states, including California, Virginia, and Colorado, which aim to regulate business use of consumer data.
It examines the discovery, exhibits, pleadings and other documents in a case and automatically finds and displays citations to the source documents that provide the factual support, as well as caselaw, statutes and regulations.
It can also help with legal research, finding relevant caselaws or statutes quickly without endless hours of manual searching. Its like giving the system a library of past contracts, case outcomes, or legal trends to analyze so it can make better predictions and decisions.
There are more than 300 opinions by federal courts dealing with the express preemption of contracts, and within them two main approaches have emerged. Until recently, the Sixth Circuit was the most prominent court that endorsed this approach. However, it was sometimes not as clear as the caselaw of other circuits.
In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , Further, employers should examine their bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies to ensure that what is or is not company data is well defined according to their business, regulatory and litigation needs. In In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , 18-cv-2022 WL 972401 (D.
In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , Further, employers should examine their bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies to ensure that what is or is not company data is well defined according to their business, regulatory and litigation needs. In In re Pork Antitrust Litig. , 18-cv-2022 WL 972401 (D.
primary law library of cases, statutes, regulations, court rules and constitutions. The company said it will incorporate the legal research data into its core platform to create a marriage of factual development and legal analysis, allowing litigators to analyze fact patterns against the relevant law. “We
Also, Court clerks are indispensable members of the judicial system. So, what exactly does it mean to be a court clerk? So, what exactly does it mean to be a court clerk? Court clerk duties and responsibilities First off, what does a courtroom clerk do on a daily basis? Where do court clerks work?
Courts throughout the United States have different perspectives on the actions that constitute spoliation of evidence and the situations in which these actions should be sanctioned. Furthermore, as courts examine and re-examine these concepts over time, their perspectives shift.
Courts throughout the United States have different perspectives on the actions that constitute spoliation of evidence and the situations in which these actions should be sanctioned. Furthermore, as courts examine and re-examine these concepts over time, their perspectives shift.
The State Democracy Research Initiative and the Elections Research Center at UW-Madison invite you to join them for the “Year in Review: Democracy Litigation in SCOTUS and the States” on Thursday, July 11th from 3:00-4:15pm, with a reception to follow. This panel is approved for 1.5 CLE credits.
This week we have Damien Riehl , VP, Litigation Workflow and Analytics Content at FastCase, and one of the drivers behind SALI (Standards Advancement for for the Legal Industry.) Damien is the Vice-President of Litigation Workflow and Analytics content and part of the leadership at SALI. And then I litigate the patent.
The court outlines the plaintiff’s legal theory: because YouTube has automated software that scans videos to help users identify potentially infringing clips, Plaintiff’s DMCA notices imputed on YouTube knowledge of each and every single clip that infringed on a noticed film. Its complaint covers about 7,000 clips from 570 films.
Unlike most of the CCB cases to date, this case involves Section 512(f), the DMCA cause of action for bogus takedown notices. Consistent with the CCB’s small claims court ethos, the case involved both a pro se claimant and respondent. The CCB filing cost is about $300 less than federal court. Here’s the odd part.
Not surprisingly, in these early days of CCPA private actions, plaintiffs are trying to push the boundaries of the law and testing who, when, and why a CCPA claim may be brought. Epic Games moved to compel arbitration based on its terms of service, which the court granted. In Rahman v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., Marriott Int’l, Inc.,
(The professional/personal distinction remains hot for politicians using social media–that issue is headed to the Supreme Court). The employee-protection social media laws have mostly faded from memory, but they did not resolve when a social media account was the employer’s or employee’s.
As law students, few litigators imagined themselves transitioning into project management roles after passing the bar. Litigators rarely receive formal training in project management, but this does not mean they do not do project management. AI-Powered State Court Intelligence & Judicial Analytics.
These tools offer unparalleled access to extensive databases of legal information, precedents, and caselaw. By leveraging keyword searches and advanced filters, attorneys can swiftly identify pertinent cases, statutes, and regulations, thereby conserving valuable time and resources.
before the US Court of Appeals for the Central District of California, it was a recently decided that a case is not per se exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 soley because (1) the cost of litigation exceeds plaintiff’s potential damages or (2) a party’s legal argument was rejected on summary judgment. Uniclass Technology Co.,
It combines general internet data from the GPT model with legal-specific data, including caselaw and reference materials. When engaged by a law firm, Harvey AI undergoes further training using the firm’s own work products and templates. Related content: We ask ChatGPT: Are true crime findings admissible in court?
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. Three courts of appeals have answered “no.” ” National Car Rental System, Inc.
The legislative history also expressed an intent to retain existing caselaw on vicarious liability of a principal for the acts of its agents, including independent contractors. Supreme Court. As a result, a rich body of caselaw has developed distinguishing direct liability from secondary liability. 3d at 593. [To
Transparency in the legal system is achieved by allowing reporters to publish articles on cases, allowing the public into courts to view proceedings, and allowing public access to court judgements and documents. Similarly, it can assist insurers assess risk when providing insurance in litigationcases.
Calloquy Platform Elevator Pitch: Calloquy is dedicated to making remote legal proceedings safe, secure, and efficient, both to reduce cost and risk for corporate litigants and to expand access to justice for underserved communities. Case Chronology Elevator Pitch: We are the legal Gold Standard for Chronologies.
primary law library of cases, statutes, regulations, court rules and constitutions. The company said it will incorporate the legal research data into its core platform to create a marriage of factual development and legal analysis, allowing litigators to analyze fact patterns against the relevant law. “We
But it's not a good idea when it comes to the expert witnesses and the judges in your cases. Context in One Sentence Context on Lexis Advance is a new litigation analytics product that enables you to visualize and leverage the historical record of experts and judges to draft better arguments. What Else Should You Know?
The agenda featured a diverse range of topics, such as Modern Data, Link Files, eDiscovery CaseLaw, and Artificial Intelligence, making it an exceptional experience for attendees. Plaintiffs asked the Court to enter default judgment against the City, or, in the alternative, for an adverse-inference instruction. Doe LS 340 v.
The purpose of a motion is to request a court ruling on specific legal or procedural issues, such as dismissing a case, delaying a trial, excluding evidence, or seeking a new trial. Motion hearings play a strategic role in the litigation process. Request a demo to see how it works.) What is the purpose of a motion?
However, this can come as a relief to many lawyers, who might suffer from what Bloomberg calls information overload : a sea of court opinions, practice guidelines, law reviews, and other materials that no one person – or team of people – could ever help to cover in an instant.
By seeking to dismiss a case early in the litigation, you can potentially prevail without the trouble of full-blown discovery and a trial. A motion to dismiss is a motion filed on behalf of a defendant asking the court to dismiss the plaintiff’s case. federal court. In some U.S.
And while some of the marketing efforts surrounding TAR make it seem TAR can replace attorney review wholesale, some attorneys considering the use of TAR in litigation or in response to regulatory inquiries are more focused on ignoring the “buzz” and instead have zeroed in on what judges have actually said (and held) regarding TAR.
Motion practice shapes the case, and if you want to handle your cases more professionally, understanding motion practice is essential. Legal motion management is an essential aspect of the litigation process. Legal motions allow parties to assert their rights, and seek relief from the court regarding certain cases.
Boost strategy: With AI, you can quickly find legal precedents, predict case outcomes, and build effective case strategies. From personal injury to commercial litigation, AI can support lawyers working in every legal sector. AI in Law Firms Okay, so that’s how AI works and why it’s helpful. The result? It’s possible.
When Jerome “Jerry” Larkin joined the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) in 1978, he had just graduated from Loyola University Chicago School of Law, spent eight years in the Catholic seminary system, and knew he wanted to dedicate his career to public service. He was a gentleman in dealings with his opponents.
The same holds true in the Supreme Court. The post Pardon the Interruptions appeared first on Liquid Litigation Management. Anyone who has sat through any oral argument knows that interruptions can just be a part of the game, whether those interruptions are by judge or opposing counsel.
Yesterday I did a blog post about that and noted it tracked the opinion of the Oklahoma Supreme Court released in Oklahoma Bar Association v Weigel , 2014 OK 4 (2014). Suppose Big Bank has one law firm in their region that they used, and the bankers were very pleased with the firm’s competency and service level.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content