This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights.
When I started the blog, I didn’t contemplate having guest bloggers. As it turns out, about 20% of the blog posts have been made by guest bloggers. Laura Heymann (William & Mary Law) Jeffrey Hunt Angie Jin Josh King Jonathan Klinger Prof. Stacey Lantagne (now of Western New England Law) Prof. Jeff Kosseff (U.S.
That section states that rights under statelaws that are “equivalent” to rights under copyright law are preempted. On June 26, just before the end of its term, the Supreme Court denied Genius’s cert petition, putting this litigation to rest. ML Genius v. This leaves us with a rather deep split of authorities.
Some people also may find it a hassle to comply with the strict requirements under statelaw for starting and operating a corporation. Arbitration is more formal than mediation but less cumbersome than litigation. Should I Incorporate My Company in Delaware? The mediator cant impose an outcome on the parties.
For example, the most aggressive companies in pursuing web-scraping litigation are the social media companies. LinkedIn and Facebook, most notably, have done as much as anyone to shape the law of web scraping. — But regardless of what you and I think about this legal regime, that is the current state of the law.
The opinions came out faster than I could blog them. I’m not going to comprehensively blog each of the opinions, but I’ll round up some highlights here to get these out of my queue. Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation , 2024 WL 4532937 (N.D.
In some cases, a consumer might resort to alternative dispute resolution , rather than litigation. Either arbitration or mediation may be faster and less expensive than litigation. The federal government has not yet enacted a comprehensive data privacy law, although various federal laws protect certain types of people or information.
Given that they are litigating 512(f), your wish was partially granted. Longarzo * DMCAs Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw ClaimsStevens v. Universal * Two 512(f) Rulings Where The Litigants Dispute Copyright Ownership * It Takes a Default Judgment to Win a 17 USC 512(f) CaseAutomattic v.
Section 301(a) of the Copyright Act provides that “no person is entitled to any such right or equivalent right in any such work under the common law or statutes of any State.” With that, any state or common law claim that is equivalent to copyright must therefore be preempted. But normative judgments aside, ProCD v.
What is less known is that many of these states also impose substantive cybersecurity requirements. In this Debevoise Data Blog post, we examine the general cybersecurity obligations under statelaw, including common themes and recent developments. Since then, approximately 23 states and Washington, D.C.
I’ve blogged many Ripoff Report cases over the years, but it’s been a while since my last one (looks like 2018 ?). Section 230 Ripoff Report claimed that removal was justified because Section 230 completely preempted the statelaw claims. Xcentric appeared first on Technology & Marketing LawBlog.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s delay in definitively resolving this case will leave a vacuum for reviewing many other pending and imminent constitutional challenges to statelaws. NetChoice appeared first on Technology & Marketing LawBlog. I will have a more complete analysis of the cases soon.
The legal proceedings can be broadly categorised into civil and criminal litigation, each governed by distinct laws and procedures. This blog highlights the key differences between civil and criminal litigation according to the law. Discovery is the process by which parties exchange information and evidence.
The plaintiff claimed that federal law didn’t preempt his statelaw claim, but the court breezily rejects that. (I Even pro se litigants typically recognize these cases are doomed and rarely file them any more. Nextdoor appeared first on Technology & Marketing LawBlog. Nextdoor, Inc.
Power Ventures for the proposition that de minimis losses can state a 502 claim…belated kudos to Facebook’s litigation team for setting key Facebook-favorable precedent ] Facebook also challenged that it made sufficient “use” of the data. This sounds like the recipe for an infinite litigation machine.
Instagram appeared first on Technology & Marketing LawBlog. It would have been easy to save the list at the end of each day. You can essentially hear Judge Alsup’s teeth gnashing in the opinion. 23, 2024) The post Allegations of a Bribe-Driven Facebook-OnlyFans Conspiracy Unsurprisingly Fall Apart in Court–Dangaard v.
Longarzo * DMCAs Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw ClaimsStevens v. Universal * Two 512(f) Rulings Where The Litigants Dispute Copyright Ownership * It Takes a Default Judgment to Win a 17 USC 512(f) CaseAutomattic v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown NoticesAmaretto v.
Some screenshots depicting the framing (the first image shows Google’s superimposed frame on the right; the second shows what happens if users click on the frame in the first image): If this issue sounds familiar, it’s because framing generated huge discussion in Internet Law circles… 20+ years ago. Google LLC , No.
On December 16, 2021, Anna Gressel and Avi Gesser from our Data Strategy and Security Group were joined by Maeve O’Connor and Jyotin Hamid of our Commercial Litigation Group for a special installment of our Data Security Webcast on artificial intelligence (AI) and cybersecurity whistleblowers.
Information Privacy Law. With a thorough discussion of the nuances related to advertising and tracking, this section also covers the new privacy laws impacting the industry, including updates stemming from the CCPA, the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA), and the Colorado Privacy Act.
But the risks of irresponsible adoption of GenAI customer service chatbots, including increased litigation and reputational risk, could eclipse their promise. In this Debevoise Data Blog post, we focus on customer service chatbots and provide some practices that can help companies avoid legal and reputational risk when adopting such tools.
And while I think some of the most exciting use cases for this technology is uploading your own documents, right, we were talking before we started about, you know, pointing it at all of the documents in your litigation, the transcripts, the correspondence, discovery, etc. That is at the heart of litigation. So that’s part one.
And I think they could certainly be protected under both copyright, to which we typically turn to protect works of art, and also statelaw rights of publicity, to which we typically turn to protect people’s names, images, and likenesses. [Professor Molly Van Houweling] [11:11] Yeah, it’s a really thought-provoking question.
For purposes of these blog posts, we focus mainly on the former use case—matching a face to a specific person for identification purposes—rather than other use cases such as emotional evaluation and lie detection. StateLaws Permitting but Regulating Collection and Use of Biometric Identifiers, including Facial Data.
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
To be valid, a will usually must be in writing, created by a testator with legal capacity to make a will, and signed by the testator and witnesses in accordance with statelaw. Justia provides a 50-state survey on requirements for wills.) How Do You Prove the Validity of a Will? How Are Assets Distributed if There Is No Will?
But the sender’s dereliction in this case really got to me, so it’s worth the blog post. Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts StateLaw Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v.
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Universal * Two 512(f) Rulings Where The Litigants Dispute Copyright Ownership * It Takes a Default Judgment to Win a 17 USC 512(f) Case–Automattic v. Ripps appeared first on Technology & Marketing LawBlog.
The litigants are an employer and former employee. “Courts in the Ninth Circuit have regularly held that the DMCA preempts statelaw claims arising out of submission of takedown notices.” ” 512(f) once again wipes out statelaw claims, even if 512(f) doesn’t apply. Create Music Group, Inc.,
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Universal * Two 512(f) Rulings Where The Litigants Dispute Copyright Ownership * It Takes a Default Judgment to Win a 17 USC 512(f) Case–Automattic v. Maritas appeared first on Technology & Marketing LawBlog.
Mindgeek litigation, the court certified a class of CSAM victims suing Mindgeek for “knowingly” disseminating videos of them. US * New Civil FOSTA Lawsuits Push Expansive Legal Theories Against Unexpected Defendants (Guest Blog Post) * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Doe v. Twitter, Inc.
Since we affirm the district court’s rulings on the statelaw claims, we need not resolve the federal law cross appeal.” Letgo appeared first on Technology & Marketing LawBlog. That was an obviously problematic conclusion. Nevertheless, the Tenth Circuit dodges it: “We need not reach this issue.
We’re still working through the first wave of litigation testing Congress’ poor handiwork. US * New Civil FOSTA Lawsuits Push Expansive Legal Theories Against Unexpected Defendants (Guest Blog Post) * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Doe v. Last October , in Doe v.
US * New Civil FOSTA Lawsuits Push Expansive Legal Theories Against Unexpected Defendants (Guest Blog Post) * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking LawsuitDoe v. US (Guest Blog Post) * Indianapolis Police Have Been Blinded Lately Because They Shut Backpage Down * Constitutional Challenge Against FOSTA FiledWoodhull v.
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful StateLaw Claims–Stevens v. Universal * Two 512(f) Rulings Where The Litigants Dispute Copyright Ownership * It Takes a Default Judgment to Win a 17 USC 512(f) Case–Automattic v. Barrett Financial appeared first on Technology & Marketing LawBlog.
I never blogged that opinion for two reasons. Second, the opinion was so clearly wrong and garbled that I expected the Seventh Circuit would take the case en banc and issue a more coherent and less terrible opinion that I would then blog. I can’t bring myself to go back and blog that opinion now. Snap litigation.
Even if not enacted, its provisions are likely to influence a future federal privacy law. And, in many ways, the ADPPA may set a new minimum standard that will shape any statelaws passed to fill the void left by the lack of a federal privacy law. We’ve previously written about the development of U.S. ADPPA § 302(a).
Due Diligence Requirements : The Bulletin states that before utilizing any data collection method, fraud algorithm or rating/underwriting or marketing tool, insurers “must conduct their own due diligence to ensure full compliance with all applicable laws.” To subscribe to the Data Blog, please click here.
Given its similarity to Illinois’s (BIPA), if the New York BPA is enacted, it would likely make New York home to a flurry of class action litigation. Unlike the Washington law, the proposed Massachusetts and New York bills contain no safe harbors for security uses. Has the company obtained those individuals’ consent?
Matt also conducts public records investigations and litigates cases challenging government surveillance. Are there any examples of other states or international examples that this abuse of this data has been more hampered than here in California? Thank you for taking out the time for this and welcome to our podcast….
The panel summarizes: “Because Does statelaw claims necessarily implicate Grindrs role as a publisher of third-party content, 230 bars those claims. Doe fails to state a plausible TVPRA claim, so Doe cannot invoke a statutory exception to 230 immunity.” The district court dismissed the case. Case Citation : Doe v.
32] When Confronting Potential FTC Enforcement, Recognize That Deciding Whether to Settle or Litigate Requires a Case-by-Case Assessment of a Wide Range of Factors The vast majority of FTC consumer protection enforcement actions result in settlements. 14] Alvaro Bedoya, Privacy as Civil Right, New Mexico Law Review, Vol. 1, 2021). [13]
The first time I blogged about them , they brought a SAD Scheme suit that initially resulted in an ex parte TRO. The second time I blogged about them , their case fell apart because their purported exclusive enforcement rights weren’t sufficient to confer copyright standing.
At this point, the plaintiffs are arguing that their claims belong in state court because their allegations are too weak to support Article III standing for federal court. That’s a litigation strategy, I guess. 25, 2024) The post Amazon Must Defend “Yelp Law” Claim–Ramos v. Amazon.com, Inc.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content