Remove Blog Remove Litigation Remove State law
article thumbnail

Elon Musk’s Gifts to Web Scrapers (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.

Court 123
article thumbnail

Contractual Control over Information Goods after ML Genius v. Google (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

That section states that rights under state laws that are “equivalent” to rights under copyright law are preempted. On June 26, just before the end of its term, the Supreme Court denied Genius’s cert petition, putting this litigation to rest. ML Genius v. This leaves us with a rather deep split of authorities.

Court 98
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Web Scraping for Me, But Not for Thee (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

For example, the most aggressive companies in pursuing web-scraping litigation are the social media companies. LinkedIn and Facebook, most notably, have done as much as anyone to shape the law of web scraping. — But regardless of what you and I think about this legal regime, that is the current state of the law.

article thumbnail

Should Copyright Preemption Moot Anti-Scraping TOS Terms? (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

Section 301(a) of the Copyright Act provides that “no person is entitled to any such right or equivalent right in any such work under the common law or statutes of any State.” With that, any state or common law claim that is equivalent to copyright must therefore be preempted. But normative judgments aside, ProCD v.

Judge 98
article thumbnail

The State of State Law Cybersecurity Requirements

Debevoise Data Blog

What is less known is that many of these states also impose substantive cybersecurity requirements. In this Debevoise Data Blog post, we examine the general cybersecurity obligations under state law, including common themes and recent developments. Since then, approximately 23 states and Washington, D.C.

article thumbnail

Ripoff Report Gets a Pricey Lesson on Section 230–Selker v. Xcentric

Eric Goldman

I’ve blogged many Ripoff Report cases over the years, but it’s been a while since my last one (looks like 2018 ?). Section 230 Ripoff Report claimed that removal was justified because Section 230 completely preempted the state law claims. Xcentric appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.

article thumbnail

Statement on the Supreme Court’s Ruling in Moody v. NetChoice

Eric Goldman

Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s delay in definitively resolving this case will leave a vacuum for reviewing many other pending and imminent constitutional challenges to state laws. NetChoice appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. I will have a more complete analysis of the cases soon.

Court 115