This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If youre considering bringing a lawsuit, or if youve been sued by someone else, you may come across a lot of unfamiliar terms and concepts. A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. Whats a Statute of Limitations?
A homeowner who has a defense to foreclosure can raise the defense in response to the lawsuit. A homeowner who has a defense would need to file a new lawsuit in court. Eventually, they probably will need to go to a court hearing on the issue. This process tends to unfold more efficiently.
Already, lawsuits involving AI-generated works have been filed in federal courts from coast to coast. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts. A pending lawsuit in the U.S. If it does not grant either motion, the lawsuit will continue toward trial.
Our upcoming webinar will explore these evolving intersections by diving into high-profile lawsuits that are shaping the legal boundaries of AI, analyzing legal tests and arguments involved, examining the implications of the DMCA concerning AI, and discussing potential liabilities and legal uncertainties for developers and rights holders.
Department of Justice (DOJ) opened an antitrust investigation into Live Nation Entertainment, the owner of Ticketmaster, and on January 24th, the Senate Judiciary Committee held its first hearing to investigate the case. In 2010, Ticketmaster merged with Live Nation to become Live Nation Entertainment.
This long-running lawsuit started in 2019. When I first blogged this case in January 2021, I wrote: This lawsuit, like many others before it, claims that UGC services like YouTube commit illegal discrimination based on how they moderate content. Google appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
The lawsuit claims the BPOs were TikTok’s proxies. The court also allows an exception to the general rule due to the supply of unsafe equipment, i.e., the faulty sorting software for reviewer queues. * * * Similar lawsuits by content moderators have failed, including Garrett-Alfred v. Facebook and Aguilo v. Cognizant.
On November 22, 2023, the lawsuit against Lizzo by three of her previous backup dancers had its first court hearing. Continue reading → The post Behind the Bench: Unpacking Judge Epstein’s Inquiries in Lizzo LawsuitHearing first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
Department of Justice (DOJ) opened an antitrust investigation into Live Nation Entertainment, the owner of Ticketmaster, and on January 24th, the Senate Judiciary Committee held its first hearing to investigate the case. In 2010, Ticketmaster merged with Live Nation to become Live Nation Entertainment.
I’m going to crank this blog post out before I get swamped with press requests. My takeaways: I did not hear 5 votes in favor of the plaintiffs’ position. The justices frequently crossed over to discuss the ATA prima facie case, the subject of tomorrow’s hearing in Taamneh v.
I’m blogging this otherwise-routine opinion because I blogged another opinion involving Viral DRM where it tried a SAD Scheme attack on various YouTube uploaders. To be clear, the ruling I’m blogging today isn’t a SAD Scheme case. 28, 2025) Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Another N.D. Emoji GmbH v.
Failing to follow the applicable rules can result in fines, vastly increased damages in a personal injury lawsuit, and even jail time in some cases. However, a dog owner can contest the designation of their dog as dangerous at a hearing.
While this is only the second appellate circuit to adopt this approach, the Second Circuit, having jurisdiction over New York State, hears a disproportionally high number of cases concerning copyright and contracts. The Solicitor General’s Brief After losing at the Second Circuit, Genius asked the Supreme Court to hear its appeal.
If the publishers find any smoking guns, we’ll hear more about them. March 5, 2024) The post Twitter Narrows, But Doesn’t Completely Avoid, a Dangerous Copyright Lawsuit–Concord Music v. X appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. I imagine they will be thorough. 2024 WL 945325 (M.D.
This is the tree that fell in the forest that no one was around to hear. Remember: the only winnners of keyword ads lawsuits are the lawyers. Adler v McNeil * Court Denies Injunction in Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit–Nursing CE Central v. Bye, Goff * Yet More Evidence That Keyword Advertising Lawsuits Are Stupid–Porta-Fab v.
Generative AI has transformed how people around the world work; how they create; and what they see, hear, and watch online. The past year was marked by many more filed cases than decisions, and those decisions that were issued largely demonstrated how well-known pitfalls will also hamper this new wave of AI lawsuits. In Millette v.
In my previous post , I summarized: This lawsuit involves troubling allegations that Facebook executives ( allegedly , Nick Clegg, Nicola Mendelsohn, and Cristian Perrella) took bribes from OnlyFans-related entities to spike Facebook and Instagram posts that promoted competitors of OnlyFans. The plaintiffs’ allegations were sizzling.
For those reasons, I strongly suspect this will not be the last we hear of this case. Second, it fits better with the “opt-out” design of the Internet, so it makes it easier to dispose of “troll-like” cases like the Hunley lawsuit. One can hear the protests of “that’s socialism!”
The lawsuit’s lengthy duration and high defense cost has significant substantive implications. Whether the 9th Circuit hears it en banc or not, I assume this case will again head to the Supreme Court. Blog post on amicus briefs. Blog post on Asurvio v. Blog post on that ruling. Blog post on the filings.
Indeed, they are already filing lawsuits despite the pending Supreme Court appeal hanging over the law. appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Plaintiffs CAN’T WAIT to sue Internet services using the Texas social media censorship law. But surprise!
Without hearing from the defense, the adjudicators are far too likely to find over-infringement and give insufficient credit to the defenses (such as the first sale defense for used/gray market goods). StopTheSADScheme Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Judge Reconsiders SAD Scheme Ruling Against Online Marketplaces–Squishmallows v.
” “Plaintiff’s timing in filing and dismissing its lawsuit suggests an improper purpose… Plaintiff’s delay in filing the TRO undercuts its supposed urgency, suggesting instead that Plaintiff timed its filing to sideline its competitors during a busy sales season. Schedule A Defendants , 1:23-cv-02605-JLR (S.D.N.Y.
Greg Lambert 11:27 Yeah, I think one of the thing that when you talk SALI, especially to someone that just hears standards, oh, great, you know, here’s one more layer of work that we’re going to have to do. So that’s what the lawsuit is. We’d love to hear from you. And as always, the music you hear is from Jerry David DeCicca.
In other words, the court could have–AND SHOULD HAVE–called out these issues during the ex parte TRO hearing. I reiterate my view that ex parte hearings are notoriously error-prone and should be viewed as an extreme option. YouTube Schedule A Defendants appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
And we’ll get to the evolution of what that looks like, because the author is here, which will be great to hear about. Greg Lambert 27:23 It’s really interesting, because I think this is a story that you hear a lot, especially with the artist is that, you know, a lot of the greatest creations come from some, unfortunately, amount of pain.
For any lawyer defending a client in a lawsuit, they require the ability to utilize a powerful tool in their arsenal–the motion to dismiss. In this blog, we explore all these facets of motions to dismiss. During the hearing, listen carefully to opposing counsel’s arguments so you can respond effectively.
Look at successful contracting approaches for dispute resolution outside your industry, particularly if your past projects resulted in a large number of claims or lawsuits. Get outside your comfort zone Dispute resolution in some industrial sectors is focused on only either litigation or arbitration.
Have you ever found yourself curious about the legal stuff you hear about? Understanding the key differences between these two types of lawsuits could be extremely helpful if you ever find yourself in a difficult circumstance. This blog highlights the key differences between civil and criminal litigation according to the law.
This blog explores different alternative dispute resolution processes and methods, such as mediation, arbitration, and litigation. It is somewhat similar to the lawsuit and requires an attorney. The process involves hearings similar to that of the court. It involves lawsuits, judges, courtrooms, and hearings.
In Australia, legal tech company Nuix went public in 2020 – an IPO that has been haunted by regulatory investigations and class-action lawsuits over claims that the company misrepresented its financial information.). Given this paucity of U.S. legal tech IPOs, it is notable that 2021 saw three U.S. Was ILTA wrong to meet in person?
This blog explores different alternative dispute resolution processes and methods, such as mediation, arbitration, and litigation. It is somewhat similar to the lawsuit and requires an attorney. The process involves hearings similar to that of the court. It involves lawsuits, judges, courtrooms, and hearings.
Fearing overseas defendants will abscond with ill-gotten gains if served with a lawsuit, plaintiffs seek an ex parte temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to freeze funds held by online merchants, then follow up with a request for a preliminary injunction. agent, but still represent at the hearing that its home base was his law firm.
In this blog, we will discuss a few ways in which you can deal with clients that don’t pay. You can mention something like “to avoid any further action” or civil lawsuit. It is time to send a final demand letter before you file a lawsuit. And your client doesn’t show up for the hearing, you will win the claim by default.
In this blog, we will discuss a few ways in which you can deal with clients that don’t pay. You can mention something like “to avoid any further action” or civil lawsuit. It is time to send a final demand letter before you file a lawsuit. And your client doesn’t show up for the hearing, you will win the claim by default.
The flagship product automates drafting responses to lawsuits, discovery requests, demand letters, and more by leveraging a firm’s historical data. And then kind of looking at, you know, the typical story that we hear of a lot of tech companies, as they, you know, identify a discrete problem, but I want to twist it just a little bit.
Five seconds after turning on your television you’re likely to hear an authoritative voice ask, “Have you or a loved one been diagnosed with mesothelioma? These mass lawsuits are vital in that they offer compensation for painful, and often deadly, diseases. If so, you may be entitled to financial compensation.”
Since the implementation of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) 18 months ago, more than 75 lawsuits have been filed seeking damages using the Act’s private cause of action. At least one lawsuit seeks to do this. To subscribe to the Data Blog, please click here. Both the Hanna Andersson and Minted, Inc.
Whether you are an aspiring law student or a working professional, this blog can be helpful for you. The blog will offer you snapshots of different types of legal practice areas. And the insight from the blog will help you in deciding the right practice area. We will explore different types of law to practice areas.
This blog post gives an overview of the copyright issues surrounding use of generative AI and their current position under India’s copyright law. In fact, we have created the image for this blog post using Bing’s AI based image creator. It discusses attempts to secure copyright protection for AI generated works.
If you’re eager to delve deeper into the world of legal motion, this blog can be helpful for you. Motion for Summary Judgment A motion for summary judgment is a legal request that one party makes in a lawsuit. The legal motion follow-up can include filling in the response for the motion or attending the motion hearing.
As these lawsuits get brought to open AI. We’d love to hear from you. And as always, the music you hear is from Jerry David DeCicca Thank you, Jerry. And those those enterprise terms will be what we would expect when we integrate with any model. Because it is generating content that is contaminated?
If, for instance, the government thinks someone is cheating on their benefits, that person gets a hearing. So all you’ve got is a lawsuit. So for instance, we’re not allowed to use, in America we’re not allowed to use automated computer matching and analysis to deny people’s benefits.
Prior blog post on the district court ruling. ” Ugh, seriously, nooooo… Keyword metatags are the trees that fall in the forest that no one hears. The court is telling trademark owners, as plain as it can, to stop bringing competitive keyword advertising lawsuits. Google was a major player in this lawsuit by proxy.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content