Eric Goldman

MARCH 22, 2025

When I started the blog, I didn’t contemplate having guest bloggers. As it turns out, about 20% of the blog posts have been made by guest bloggers. Laura Heymann (William & Mary Law) Jeffrey Hunt Angie Jin Josh King Jonathan Klinger Prof. Stacey Lantagne (now of Western New England Law) Prof. Jeff Kosseff (U.S.

Law 52

Law Law Intellectual Property Failure-to-appear 52

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 2, 2023

“Duffer seeks to hold Nextdoor, a service provider, liable for its failure to remove material posted by users of its website. . “Duffer seeks to hold Nextdoor, a service provider, liable for its failure to remove material posted by users of its website. Nextdoor appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.

Failure-to-appear 98

Failure-to-appear Defendant Federal law Lawsuit 98

Eric Goldman

APRIL 29, 2023

I’ve documented dozens of ways that 512(f) claims have failed, so the failure of this claim isn’t surprising. In this lawsuit, BAYC sued an “appropriation artist,” Ripps, who sought to comment on anti-Semitic aspects of the BAYC NFTs. See this ruling for another example of the same parlor trick).

Court 105

Court Failure-to-appear Lawsuit State law 105

Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 12, 2021

A 36-hour deadline appears to be one of the most rigorous timeframes of any U.S. Background Banking organizations already are subject to reporting obligations of cyber events and data breaches under applicable federal and state laws. breach reporting scheme.

Failure-to-appear 52

Failure-to-appear State law Law Law 52

Eric Goldman

JUNE 7, 2023

” This does not persuade the judge: the Court must treat Defendants as publishers or speakers, regardless of how their claims are framed, because their theories of liability plainly turn on Defendants’ alleged failure to monitor and remove third-party content. To get around Section 230, the plaintiffs attempted the Lemmon v.

Failure-to-appear 118

Failure-to-appear Defendant Lawsuit Court 118

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 26, 2023

Where the motion to dismiss concerns questions of law, additional discovery is not required. Therefore, as MindGeek’s motion to dismiss concerns only questions of law, no discovery is required to rule on the motion to dismiss. ” * Doe v. Grant, 2021 Ariz. LEXIS 1327 (Az. Superior Ct. Puppies, 2020 Ariz. LEXIS 851 (Az.

Defendant 98

Defendant Failure-to-appear Court Lawsuit 98

Eric Goldman

JUNE 9, 2024

The court dismisses the case but gives the plaintiff the chance to amend the complaint to plead failure-to-warn and negligent design–because those arguments show up in virtually every 230 case now. . § 230, forecloses Doe’s claim as currently pled, because she seeks to hold Meta liable for content created by her trafficker.”

Lawsuit 88

Lawsuit Criminal trial Court Failure-to-appear 88