This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Our top-eleven European dataprotection developments for the end of 2024 are: EU Cyber Resilience Act: The Council of the European Union approved the Cyber Resilience Act , introducing cybersecurity requirements for digital products sold in the EU. The UK Upper Tribunal did not consider the provisions under the UK GDPR.
Our top-five European dataprotection developments from February are: European Commission publishes guidelines on prohibited AI practices : The EU Commission has published non-binding guidance on the EU AI Acts prohibited use cases. The ban entered into force on 2 February 2025. Spanish Telecomm Provider Fined 1.2
privacy legislation, is now addressing these technologies with a new set of proposed rules by the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA). The European Unions General DataProtection Regulation (GDPR) , particularly Article 22 , addresses similar concerns by regulating decisions made solely through automated processing.
On April 26, 2023, the General Court of the European Union issued its judgment in Case T-557/20, SRB v EDPS. The Court held that pseudonymized data transmitted to a data recipient will not be considered personal data if the data recipient does not have the means to re-identify the data subjects.
They are responsible for overseeing an organizations dataprotection measures, risk management strategies, overall security infrastructure, among other critical responsibilities. District Court for the Southern District of New York suggests that CISOs might be outside of point-blank range.
Building on prior European guidance , the French and Irish DPAs published guidance on the deployment of generative AI, large language models and dataprotection. To that end, the EDPB proposed designating DPAs as the “national competent authorities” under the AI Act to create a single point of contact.
UK DPA launches data transfer consultation What happened : The ICO launched a consultation covering its international data transfer guidance, draft transfer risk assessment tool (“TRA”) and draft international data transfer agreement (“ IDTA ”). These developments, and more, covered below.
million for vendor oversight failings, unlawful cross-border transfers What happened : The AEPD, the Spanish dataprotection authority (“DPA”), fined Vodafone Spain €8.15 4 million was for allegedly deficient oversight of Vodafone’s data processors. See our blog post here for further tips on managing the latest landscape.
Our top-five European dataprotection developments from August are: Uber fined for personal data transfer: The Dutch DataProtection Authority fined Uber €290 million for the unlawful transfer of European drivers’ personal data to the U.S., without sufficient safeguards.
The big news this November was the European DataProtection Board (the “EDPB”) issuing its highly anticipated post- Schrems II data transfer guidance, followed just a day later by the European Commission’s draft updated Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) (see our blog post here ). million fine by over 90%.
Subject access requests : The possibility that companies responding to data subject access requests from individuals will have to provide copies of entire documents containing their personal data, rather than only extracts. The court concluded that the legitimate interest could have been furthered through less intrusive means.
million fine against Austrian Post for channelling electronic dataprotection-related inquiries to a web form and not offering an additional email address, irrespective of the data subject option to also use non-electronic postal mail or customer service.
There were a few European dataprotection developments in February that companies may want to have on their radar. We will continue to report on progress through the Blog. What to do: As we reported previously there is increasing convergence between European dataprotection and competition law enforcement.
Here are our highlights: European Commission adopts new Standard Contractual Clauses What happened : As reported in our blog post , the European Commission adopted its new Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”) for the cross-border transfer of personal data from the EEA to “third countries”.
EDPB “Consent or pay” models: Businesses operating large online platforms should consider the European DataProtection Board’s recent opinion indicating that “consent or pay” models are unlikely to be GDPR-compliant.
The AEPD held that a DPO cannot hold a position that leads them to determine the purposes and means of data processing. These developments, and more, covered below.
Marketa Trimble [Eric’s introductory note: I briefly addressed the DSA in this blog post , along with the attached meme. The DSA will require much agency and court interpretation to give legal certainty to intermediaries and the recipients of their services. by guest blogger Prof.
The key development from April must be the European DataProtection Board (“EDPB”) approving the draft UK adequacy decisions from the European Commission (the “Commission”). Companies will be relieved that they are one step closer towards maintaining the seamless flow of data between the EU and the UK.
Key takeaways this April include: UK children’s dataprotection focus continues: Businesses may wish to review policies and procedures for dealing with children’s data in light of recent UK ICO fines and guidance, especially to ensure that terms of use are adequately enforced. 22, as set out by the court.
Our top five European dataprotection developments from June are: Non-material damage under GDPR: The CJEU clarified the scope of compensation for non-material damage in the context of identity theft and data subjects’ fear that their personal data had been exposed. To subscribe to the DataBlog, please click here.
European DataProtection Roundup – July Key takeaways from developments this July include: a blockbuster €746 million fine against Amazon – the largest ever GDPR penalty – showing the Regulation’s teeth; the challenges of GDPR-compliant facial recognition, after a Spanish supermarket chain was fined €2.5
In this post, we look back at the 2020 European dataprotection landscape and five trends that help companies understand not only where we are, but where dataprotection enforcement, litigation, and practice may be headed. million against Marriott for its 2018 data breach When you dig deeper though, two key points emerge.
ICO targets the data broking industry : On 27 October, the ICO demanded that Experian make sweeping changes to dataprotection practices within its direct marketing business within three months or face further enforcement action. We will continue to report on developments as Experian’s appeal progresses.
As covered in our Annual Review , 2020 was a blockbuster year for European dataprotection. The guidelines will be a new “go to” resource for those preparing for, and responding to, data breaches. Deliveroo algorithm ruled discriminatory by Italian court. English court rules GDPR does not apply to U.S. website.
Dataprotection & AI: In particular: (i) the French CNIL published its first set of guidance on GDPR compliance when developing AI tools; and (ii) the UK ICO issued a preliminary enforcement notice against Snap over its AI chatbot, alleging that Snap had not adequately assessed the privacy risks posed to child users of the tool.
As we covered here , last October, the CNIL fined Clearview AI €20 million for various dataprotection violations, including “intrusive and massive” data processing without consent or a valid legitimate interest. 82 (see our May 2021 , August 2021 , and October 2022 blog posts for previous developments).
GDPR one-stop-shop: Businesses wishing to take advantage of the GDPR one-stop-shop system should take note of a new digest, published by the European DataProtection Board, which analyses the decisions made by so-called Lead Supervisory Authorities in this context.
As multi-jurisdiction dataprotection concerns expand and opportunities to rely on a lead supervisory authority may narrow , the EDPB is emphasising consistency of decisions between national supervisory authorities through, among other measures, the development of approval procedures that require a cooperation phase and the creation of task forces.
What to do : Read our blog post for detailed guidance on scope, applicability and penalties under NIS2, including how to prepare for the revised incident reporting, security and management oversight obligations. Despite this, there remain public interest exemptions for court proceedings and law enforcement purposes.
Businesses may want to consider how the courts reasoning may apply to other circumstances when dealing with disclosure requests. For further discussion on the principle of “security by design”, see our previous blog post. The intersection between GDPR compliance and AI has been the subject of detailed analysis in a previous blog post.
I don’t normally start my blog posts with a meme, but this one tells you everything you need to know: * * * This blog post concerns the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC), passed by the California legislature in 2022. Unsurprisingly, on remand, the district court declared the rest unconstitutional.
Relatedly, a Swedish Court upheld the Swedish IMY’s 2022 reprimand of Klarna Bank AB for failing to disclose information regarding the specific recipients of personal data to a requesting data subject; providing the categories of recipients only was insufficient.
Key takeaways from March include: CNIL data security practice guide: The French DPA published an update of its data security practice guide for dataprotection officers, chief information security officers, computer scientists and legal experts. To subscribe to the DataBlog, please click here.
Nevertheless, when considering the appropriateness of protective measures, the obligation rests on the data controller to prove that they met the required standard. The rulings arose at the request of both the German and Lithuanian courts, following local administrative fines. The Court ruled that: “Scoring” (i.e.,
. : Business may want to revisit their cross-border data transfer arrangements following the new adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, assess whether they are eligible to self-certify and, if they are, whether it makes sense to. Data Privacy Framework (the “DPF”).
We also saw developments in the courts on when companies will be liable to pay individuals damages for GDPR violations and the German anti-trust regulator using its new enforcement powers. These decisions follow the CNIL’s October 2020 updated cookies guidelines (see our blog post ).
In its review, the Commission considered the development of dataprotection frameworks in the concerned countries and territories, as well as the evolving interpretation of the adequacy standard under EU law, particularly in light of the EU Court of Justice’s Schrems II judgment. Our team is happy to assist with any inquiries.
On March 4, 2023, the European Court of Justice (”CJEU”) issued its judgment on case C-300/21, UI v Österreichische Post AG. In the Court’s view, Article 82 requires establishing: (i) “damage”, either material or non-material; (ii) an actual infringement of the GDPR; and (iii) a causal link between the two.
On May 4, 2023, the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) decided, in case C-487/21 , that the right to obtain a ‘copy’ of personal data means that the data subject must provide with a faithful and intelligible reproduction of all personal data. Fulfilling the right of access.
Please click here to access the source post from our Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog. In this blog, the authors delve into a significant decision by the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) four years ago, accusing a major technology company of abusive behavior due to alleged violations of the General DataProtection Regulation (GDPR).
[Sorry it’s take me this long to get this blog post off my desk. The AADC would require many businesses to sort their online visitors into adults and children–necessarily requiring age authentication–so that children can receive heightened statutory protections. I hope it was worth the wait.] It’s not a close call.
On October 26, 2023, the European Court of Justice (“CJEU”) decided that the GDPR grants a patient the right to obtain a copy of his or her medical record free of charge ( case C-307/22, FT v DW ). The scope of GDPR’s right of access (see our blog posts here and here ) has been heavily litigated both at EU and national level.
As reported in our previous blog post , the RAD aims to harmonize member state frameworks on collective actions ( i.e. , whereby multiple claimants may lodge a claim or claims as a group) across the EU. National courts dismissal of certain claims. The main takeaways of the RAD are as follows: The role of qualified entities.
However, data controllers and processers should be aware that the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) can also carry out dawn raids as part of investigations into compliance with dataprotection laws. The ICO must obtain a court warrant to conduct a dawn raid. unlawfully obtaining personal data).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content