This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Creating an effective lawyer blog post in 2025 requires a strategic approach that combines timeless principles with modern technological advancements. While foundational blogging practices remain essential, integrating AI and other cutting-edge tools can maximize your blogs impact.
In July, Professors Vikram Amar & Michael Dorf addressed many key decisions by the Supreme Court, discussing the ways they may have changed the legal landscape. Our trusted professors are now back again to provide an engaging dialogue as to what is on the docket for the upcoming Supreme Court Term. credit hours. More Questions?
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. What Can You Ask a Court To Do? What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy. What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy.
19, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Today, Trellis launched Trellis AI, a powerful new legal productivity platform designed for the complex needs of trial court litigation. LOS ANGELES, Nov.
The JMOL had two primary conclusions: First , that the CFAA has extraterritorial application, and therefore it was appropriate for this court to apply the CFAA here. But this court says, not so. It wanted a worldwide, enforceable court order to get Booking and its affiliates to stop reselling Ryanair flights. Van Buren v.
Read it here: [link] The post DeepTrellis State Court Capabilities Help Bowman and Brooke Track Trends and DefendMass TortLitigation in State Courts (via CIO Applications) first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
You’ll discover how law firms can harness the power of AI and state court data to… Continue reading → The post Podcast Alert: Making Court Data Actionable with AI Trellis CEO Shares Insights with Host Bim Dave on Legal Helm Show first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
If you are a claimant, there is an 88% chance that your claim will be dismissed because you gave up, failed to comply with the rules, or the defendant opted out (forcing you to go to federal district court if you want to pursue the claim, which is even more costly and complicated).
Get a blog, Clarence. The post Clarence Thomas Learned Nothing From The Mess He Helped Create Regarding Section 230, Blogs Ignorantly About 230 Yet Again appeared first on Above the Law.
The defendant conceded summary judgment on liability, and the court held a trial on damages. This post covers the court’s ruling following the damages trial. Setting the Damages Range The court rejects KMC’s innocent infringement defense. Not willful. Defendant’s financial benefit. ” Deterrence.
Looking for insights into what promises to be another eventful Supreme Court term? The Supreme Court plays a central role in shaping the legal landscape of the United States. Professor Amar and Professor Dorf plan to explore key matters being considered by the Court, including Second Amendment issues in United States v.
He is also the author of several books and over 60 articles in leading law reviews, focusing on constitutional law, federal courts, and civil procedure. Michael Dorf is a Professor of Law at Cornell Law School, with a focus on constitutional law and federal courts. Supreme Court on our legal landscape. More Questions?
I will confess that when my long-time friend Kevin O’Keefe told me that his legal blogging company LexBlog was developing a generative AI integration, I was not expecting much. Illustrating How It Works Probably the best way to illustrate how it works is to walk through a typical blogging scenario.
As seen in the latest CIO Applications for the Legal Vertical publication: “Legal research has traditionally focused on appellate courts, leaving trial courts—where much litigation unfolds—fragmented and hard to access.
Siegel Helps Pennsylvania Create a Unified E-filing Court System appeared first on The Legal Tech Blog. In that role, Dan co-chairs a subcommittee that focuses on the technology necessary to create a unified system. … Read the rest The post Attorney & Tech Guru Daniel J.
In a judicial foreclosure , the lender seeks a judgment from a court to foreclose on the home. On the other hand, a non-judicial foreclosure allows a lender to foreclose on the property outside court. A homeowner who has a defense would need to file a new lawsuit in court. This may take several months or more.
As we approach the end of the year, here are the Top 10 SEC Cyber/AI posts on the Debevoise Data Blog in 2024 by page views. If you are not already a Blog subscriber, click here to sign up. The authors would like to thank Debevoise Law Clerk Achutha Raman for his contribution to this blog post.
Trellis AI helps trial court litigators save time and enhance productivity on common tasks such as motion drafting, case… Continue reading → The post Trellis AI Named Top AI-Powered Legal Productivity Platform 2025 by CIOReview Legal Community first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
The court says it found “his testimony and opinion not credible,” something no expert witness ever wants to see published in a court opinion. The reason I’m blogging this case is that Ranson used Microsoft Copilot to compute the theoretical value of the reinvested proceeds. Why would he do that?
When I started the blog, I didn’t contemplate having guest bloggers. As it turns out, about 20% of the blog posts have been made by guest bloggers. Not even any blog schwag.] Note 2: I’ve had a few other guest bloggers at my personal blog, including Prof. Note 1: all guest bloggers do it purely for the glory.
” The plaintiffs brought a pre-enforcement challenge to the law, but the court denies a preliminary injunction. The court explains: Deepfakes are image, audio, or video files that mimic real or nonexistent people saying and doing things that never happened. The court does realize the overlap here, right? ” Hmm.
Talking to teammates today in preparation for my webinar on blogging with AI on Thursday, I discovered something pretty cool. Assuming I want to blog about the case which was dismissed on the insurance company’s appeal, I need a summary of the appellate court’s decision. was dismissed by the court.
This post is all about you…readers of the blog! My blog post usually aren’t meant to be accessible to beginners. As a result, since nearly the blog’s beginning, I’ve done little to cater to beginners. I’m very grateful for your blog!” I always learn something new.”
According to the court, scrapers take active steps that serve no purpose but to trick X into given them not a second, not a third, but a millionth turn to see the sites (citations omitted). But its motion to amend its 17200 claim to add unfair acts was denied, as the court found that X Corp. Now, because the court accepted X Corp.s
Today’s document deep dive focus is on the recent California Court of Appeals decision to remand Wozniak v. YouTube, LLC to the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and the Hon. YouTube, LLC to Santa Clara County Court first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
I’m continuing my coverage of the blog’s 20th blogiversary. I asked blog readers to explain how the blog helps them. Finally I found out through your blog what was going on. Part 3: Who Reads the Blog, and Why? I was completely disheartened, worn out with worry and fear and frustration.
Federal, state and local court e-filing systems are a Tower of Babel-like mishmash of proprietary technologies and paywalls that inhibit public access to court documents. “It is particularly harmful to those that cannot afford to pay for court records.”
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
On April 26, 2023, the General Court of the European Union issued its judgment in Case T-557/20, SRB v EDPS. The Court held that pseudonymized data transmitted to a data recipient will not be considered personal data if the data recipient does not have the means to re-identify the data subjects. Pseudonymous or anonymous data.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court gave the green light for a controversial Texas immigration law to take effect, which allows local law enforcement to arrest migrants illegally crossing the border into Texas. However, shortly after the High Court’s decision, the U.S.…
They also may want to learn about the procedures in these situations, such as what happens during a traffic stop and in court. Drivers in most states do not have a right to a jury in traffic court. The Traffic Tickets Legal Center at Justia addresses substantive and procedural issues in this area of law.
Today’s focus is on Marion County Superior Court Judge Mark D. You be the judge… Continue reading → The post You Be the Judge: Sentencing, Community Outrage, and Calls for Dismissal first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
I previously blogged on this issue in 2023. The court says that the plaintiffs’ allegations treat AFF as the data controller and Confirm ID as the data processor, and that’s sufficient to acknowledge the affiliate relationship. Second, the court turns to the TOS formation question. See Kuklinski v.Binance ).
Ultimately, they might pursue an appeal in state court. Penalties also may be applied when an insurer fails to make payments as required under a court order or settlement agreement, or if the insurer does not decide whether to accept or deny a claim within the legally specified deadline after receiving the report of the injury.
This blog post covers the YOLO case remand after that Section 230 ruling. The defendant claimed that the First Amendment barred the lawsuit “because the claims would interfere with Defendant’s First Amendment discretion to choose its own content moderation policy,” citing the O’Handley district court case.
Summer is approaching, and for those in law school, this means internships, clerkships, pivotal research projects for law review or moot court, and bar review.
In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” Nealy , No.
The low grade the court earned is a consequence of it losing many points by misstating the law, misapplying the law, and especially skipping over the part where it was supposed to share its analysis and instead just stated its conclusion. Nope, the Supreme Court didn’t say that. MSCHF Prod. Studio, Inc. LEXIS 32063 (2d Cir.
Furthermore, the court determined that Facebook’s survival clause did not explicitly cover scraping after the termination of Bright Data’s accounts. Secondly, the court viewed it as a defamation claim disguised as a contractual dispute, which violates the First Amendment. Can a breach of contract claim be equivalent to copyright?
In the Bannon case, the appeals court held that Bannon’s post could qualify for anti-SLAPP protection and remanded to explore if Nelson met his pleading burdens. The court easily disagrees. The court says the test for public interest is measured objectively, not subjectively, and was satisfied here.
This assistant knows exactly where every spice,… Continue reading → The post Law Firms Level Up: Maximizing Profits with Trellis’ Federal Court Data APIs first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
The court credits Robinsons allegations that Roblox employees reviewed and approved Binello’s upload of Robinson’s copyrighted work, created a copy of that work, and stored that copy on the Roblox server. On this basis, the court distinguished VHT v. This court didnt do that. Robinson alleges that it was.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content