This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. This allows them to better assert their rights and protect their interests if they end up in litigation. What Can You Ask a Court To Do?
In what it appears would be a first for a federal circuit court, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is considering adoption of a rule change that would require lawyers and unrepresented litigants to provide a certification regarding their use of artificial intelligence in preparing court filings.
The key is crafting you patent not only for breadth, but with an eye toward litigation. The goal is for competitors to look at your patent and decide they would rather stay out of your market or pay you a licensing fee than try to fight your patent in court. This involves lawsuits, settlements, and sometimes courtroom battles.
The American Bar Association’s Litigation Section hosts its Section Annual Conference once a year and like so many gatherings, it was on hold during COVID-19. For those not familiar, the Section Annual is a premier gathering for litigators featuring elite professionals discussing trial work, strategies, and the latest innovations.
Lex Machina expands its powerful machine learning, trained and reviewed by attorneys, to help legal practitioners make data-driven decisions in state courts as well as federal courts. The post Lex Machina Expands The Power Of Legal Analytics To Litigation In State Courts appeared first on Above the Law.
Pre/Dicta , a litigation analytics platform that predicts how federal court judges will rule, is expanding to cover new motion types and also to predict litigation timelines. It will also now predict timelines for key litigation events. Pre/Dicta founder Dan Rabinowitz calls it finding their doppelgangers.
The defendant conceded summary judgment on liability, and the court held a trial on damages. This post covers the court’s ruling following the damages trial. Setting the Damages Range The court rejects KMC’s innocent infringement defense. Not willful. Defendant’s financial benefit. ” Deterrence.
However, unlike phone calls, text messages leave a written record that can later be reviewed, and, in some cases, used as evidence in court. After all, one cannot simply turn over their phone to the Court and have a Judge read all the communications between parties. The most important advice then is to think before you text.
Even for smaller cases, where the damages are less than $1 million, the patent litigation costs average $700,000. A contingent fee arrangement means your attorneys fees are tied to the success of your case. Rather than paying hourly fees upfront, your attorney receives a percentage of the damages or settlement you recover.
Amazon , where Xiaohua Huang, a pro se litigant, attempted to enforce his patents against Amazon. The court ultimately dismissed his case, citing his persistent failures to address these issues. The court ultimately dismissed his case, citing his persistent failures to address these issues.
In what it described as a case pitting “real lawyers against a robot lawyer,” a federal court in Illinois has dismissed a law firm’s suit against the self-help legal service DoNotPay. “MK has not alleged any lost revenue or added expenditures as a result of DNP’s conduct,” wrote U.S. .
In fact,no two patent attorneys would draft the same patent for the same invention. One attorney might build a tall, narrow tower with thick wallsa highly specific claim thats hard to attack but easy to walk around. But heres the truth that savvy inventors and business owners come to learn: not all patents are created equal.
There are three major developing trends in family law that were going to focus more on in the near future: Alternate Dispute Resolution Over the past several years, we have seen a larger focus on keeping matters out of court. The post Ask Attorney Jennifer B.: Undoubtedly, we will see more focus on this in 2025 and the years ahead.
Skechers (2016) Nike took Skechers to court for allegedly infringing eight Nike patents, including patents covering the Flyknit technology. The sportswear giant has sued multiple competitors over its Flyknit technology, including: Adidas (2021) Nike accused AdidasPrimeknitshoes of infringing on Flyknit patents. The case was settled in 2022.
Some states even require attorneys to stay abreast of technological advancements, such as AI, in the legal field. 32:1:1 Comment [8] Despite this mandate, many attorneys are understandably wary of incorporating advanced technology, especially artificial intelligence (AI) into their legal practice. Walmart Inc. &
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
With the improved access to litigation data from numerous vendors in the exploding legal tech ecosystem, solo practitioners, small law firms, and regional and midsize firms can take advantage of insights from data to position themselves as leaders and market movers in their respective practice areas and jurisdictions.
In the intricate realm of patent litigation, the choice of legal representation can significantly influence the outcome of a case. While you want your patent lawyer to zealously represent your interests in court, having a lawyer who is too aggressive can backfire spectacularly. Brett Trout In a word, yes.
Image credit: Al Holguin Litigation-Tech has been around for many years, helping attorneys navigate their way onto the technology highway in the courtroom. Lincoln was a skilled attorney who was always looking for ways to improve his craft. And of course, Abraham Lincoln's go-to service provider would have been Litigation-Tech
I’m not going to get all analytical here, but it is noteworthy to those involved in litigation and related services. Compared to recent years where we have seen a lower volume but higher “run” rate (around 80% in 2017), this seems to indicate that the use of technology-driven litigation support services (e.g.,
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
Armed with AI, pro se litigants could overwhelm the courts, so the courts need to be prepared to respond in kind. Generative AI could lower the hurdles and the costs for pro se litigants to bring their grievances to court. AI will force courts and lawyers to grapple with new issues over authentication of evidence.
Litigation, ADR, ODR—The Next Normal? Nicole Nehama Auerbach—litigator, co-founder of pioneering law firms Valorem Law and ElevateNext. Sohail Mohammed—electrical engineer, New Jersey Superior Court Judge, court innovator and teacher. On march 12, the New Jersey Chief Justice announced the courts going all virtual.
” The plaintiffs brought a pre-enforcement challenge to the law, but the court denies a preliminary injunction. The court explains: Deepfakes are image, audio, or video files that mimic real or nonexistent people saying and doing things that never happened. The court does realize the overlap here, right? ” Hmm.
The company was founded to perfect remote testimony and solve the problems encountered by attorneys, mediators, parties, judges, and jurors mediating and litigating remotely in real time,” the company says. The company describes its mission as “to facilitate online justice.”. CEO Alisa Brodkowitz.
In fairness, the Missouri case involved a pro se litigant, not a lawyer, but that pro se litigant claimed to have gotten the citations from a lawyer he hired through the internet. Karlen , the unwitting litigant filed an appellate brief in which 22 of 24 cases were fictitious. The court was not sympathetic.
Managing an increasing volume of cases and court deadlines– sometimes in multiple jurisdictions – is one of the biggest time management challenges for law firms. . The court ordered additional briefings, but the lawyer then missed multiple deadlines, claiming earlier orders were lost among numerous notifications on his mobile phone.
Brett Trout Patent litigation is often complex and high-stakes, but the case involvingLeigh Rothschild, Starbucks, and attorney Rachael Lamkinhas taken an unusual turn, morphing from a patent infringement lawsuit into allegations of fraud, and now, a defamation battle? from defendants through AT.
District Court in Manhattan by a legal tech executive who alleges her former company owes her over $1 million in stock and that her former boss sexually harassed her. “We expect that the New York and Texas courts will rule in favor of our clients,” attorney Shah said in her email.
Brett Trout In a recent decision by the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court (CoA) dated December 20, 2024, the court underscored the critical importance of precise patent drafting. To mitigate these risks, it is imperative to engage a qualified patent attorney from the outset.
Called Litigation Footprint, it provides a visual overview of the federal and state courts across the country in which a party has litigated, derived from the litigation histories of parties in over 27 million cases filed in 94 federal district courts and over 1,300 state courts in 34 states and the District of Columbia.
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. According to Schafer, attorneys now exhibit much greater openness to tailored AI tools that enhance productivity versus disrupting their workflows entirely. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it. It’s good to have you here.
As law students, few litigators imagined themselves transitioning into project management roles after passing the bar. Litigators rarely receive formal training in project management, but this does not mean they do not do project management. An Accidental Project Manager. Communication is no longer siloed between individuals.
Heres why patent holders need to think ahead: Drafting Patents with Litigation in Mind Choosing a patent attorney to draft your patent who has also litigated patent cases may better position your patent in court, possibly avoiding court all together.
Dean Whalen, Chief Legal Officer of Readback, a new AI-assisted deposition court reporting platform, explains how AI-assisted court reporting addresses the stenographer talent crunch — with added benefits. What Is AI-Assisted Court Reporting? AI-assisted court reporting is a hybrid model of AI and humans.
Immigration Courts and Due Process. Tips for Construction Litigation. First, we welcomed ABA Medal winner Dale Minami, a personal injury attorney who is best-known for his civil right’s work overturning a 1944 conviction in Korematsu v. Immigration Courts. Domestic & Sexual Violence and the Workplace.
Pre-planning requires making sure that you are as caught up as possible on client emails and communications, that you are prepared for any court appearances for when you return and that you apprise those who are covering for you of any issues that may arise when you are away. The post Ask Attorney Jennifer B.: Brandt at www.cozen.com.
Brett Trout In a high-stakes patent litigation case, Alpha Modus Corp. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of three patents related to real-time retail technology. Consider a contingent fee attorney arrangement when dealing with infringers having deep pockets. in the U.S. Prepare to fight.
Gavin McGrane was a litigationattorney in San Francisco when he saw an opportunity to improve how legal professionals interface with the federal courts electronic records system, PACER, and to enable them to better tap into the data and knowledge contained within that system. .
And for those involved in custody litigation, the stakes are even higher – those who drink excessively or abuse drugs or medications may find that time with their children is severely restricted. In addition to family law litigation, she also negotiates prenuptial, post-nuptial and cohabitation agreements on behalf of clients.
Patent Attorneys : Licensed lawyers who can draft and file patents, provide legal advice, draft contracts and licenses, and represent you in legal disputes. Patent Agents : Individuals who are licensed to practice before the USPTO and can assist with filing and prosecution of patents but cannot provide legal advice or representation in court.
Add in factors like the emotions involved and personal nature of the cases, and this may be why many attorneys aren’t too eager to practice family law. Plus, most folks going through a family court proceeding have never hired a lawyer before. Of course, a family lawyer needs to be a strong advocate and litigator.
This tool allows law firms to analyze aggregated and normalized state trial court data to gain competitive intelligence across cases, practice areas, and performance. Collecting this unstructured data from county courts is very challenging, but provides valuable business insights. So that was really never possible before.
In our upcoming CLE webinar, Free Law: Resources, Technology & Legal Issues (Past, Present & Future) , Tim will present his insight on the free law movement and review litigation and court decisions that have impacted this movement throughout time. Keep watch as Tim guides you through the best sources for free legal research!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content