This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Even though the themes generally tracked those I’ve already seen raised in other forums and articles, the insights that came out of the summit were enlightening and thought-provoking, especially given the bona fides of those who were there. AI will force courts and lawyers to grapple with new issues over authentication of evidence.
An example of procedural justice in the courtroom would be as simple as providing an interpreter to someone appearing at traffic court if English was not their first language. This way, regardless of the outcome of their traffic case, the persons experience in court will be more respectful and fair.
It also includes an explanation of the court system as it applies to foster youth. In addition to articles on these topics, FosterPower offers a variety of about 40 TikTok-style videos, most of which feature former foster youth sharing advice and experiences. Medical health. Mental health.
To support these wild-sounding conspiracy claims, the plaintiffs pointed to a BBC article that relied on anonymous whistleblowers and various anonymous tips. You can essentially hear Judge Alsup’s teeth gnashing in the opinion. This case got assigned to Judge Alsup’s courtroom. Case Citation : Dangaard v. LEXIS 171462 (N.D.
So but I hear we have another Schwartz. Greg Lambert 0:52 Yes, apparently this time in Los Angeles, we in our home, or at least an attorney related to a firm that had to explain why there was a brief submitted to the court that had multiple made up citations in there. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it. Greg Lambert 1:27 Yep.
This tool allows law firms to analyze aggregated and normalized state trial court data to gain competitive intelligence across cases, practice areas, and performance. Collecting this unstructured data from county courts is very challenging, but provides valuable business insights. So that was really never possible before.
A motion for a change of venue is a legal request where a case is transferred from one court jurisdiction to another to ensure a fair trial and avoid bias or undue influence. Improper venue : If your case was initially filed in a jurisdiction lacking proper legal authority or was filed to the wrong court, it could be transferred.
Multiple pieces of news today from PacerPro , a company that enables law firms to automate the workflow around distributing and capturing federal court filings. ” (To hear more from McGrane about the company and the investment by Berkley, see my recent LawNext interview with him.). .” See that article here.).
Fodder for your blog, email alerts, social media posts, and professional articles is everywhere. Surely you follow the activity of the courts in your jurisdiction so you can properly advise your clients. If your clients hear about news only from others, they may assume you don’t know what’s happening. What should she do?
Thanks to our recent audio coverage and a related Above The Law article (hat-tip Bob Ambrogi ), I learned that the first ABA TECHSHOW took place in 1986, the same year our culture met Oprah Winfrey, had “ the need for speed ”, and was graced with the birth of Lady Gaga. Tune in to hear how he does it. We hope you enjoy.
Article writing is an excellent law firm marketing strategy for many attorneys, especially if the thought of making a speech causes you to break out in a cold sweat. Corporate general counsel, among others, frequently contact attorneys based on published articles.
The court says that Viral DRM’s exclusive “management” rights is not the same as ownership or an exclusive license to the copyright. The court says that Viral DRM doesn’t have standing to enforce the copyright. All of this discussion had a Righthaven vibe to it, and it ends up in the same place.
May it please the court,” I begin. I again hear the judge asking me to begin, and this time I hear my tentative voice, “May it please the court …” I realize I must do better next time, must keep my face focused on the judge and jury, must move my hands more smoothly, must stand more confidently. We are here today …”.
He also sees opportunities to use the tools to help pro se litigants and courts. And I think all of us, you don’t have to look far to read articles where assertions are being made of copyright violation by consumption to the core model. Do you have a plan for how you’re going to interact with these agencies and courts?
” In an article yesterday in Business Insider , Jur’s founder and CEO Alessandro Palombo said that his company is building the “Tesla of justice.” Jur says platform supports every phase of the arbitration process, from filing a claim to case management, hearings, and issuance and enforcement of an award.
The state is expected to appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, setting up a potential hearing in the US Supreme Court. This article is accessible to everyone.) The Department of Justice filed a brief in support of the Arkansas plaintiffs, saying the case “ implicates important federal interests.”
First, the trademark rules on the street can differ widely from the doctrines drawn up in appellate courts. Without hearing from the defense, the adjudicators are far too likely to find over-infringement and give insufficient credit to the defenses (such as the first sale defense for used/gray market goods).
While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders. We securely give fiduciaries access to assets when required with no password-sharing, no court orders, and correct titling.
Generative AI has transformed how people around the world work; how they create; and what they see, hear, and watch online. There are also likely to be fundamental disagreements among judges as to the strength of core defenses like fair use, which in the past have split appellate courts and even the Supreme Court.
If you or members of your team have IoT-connected devices at home like Amazon’s Alexa or a Nest security camera, you need to be wary of what work-related information those devices might see or hear during the day. Remember how much you practiced your first moot court argument or your first “real court” argument?
In a plot twist, the court denies Viral DRM’s preliminary injunction request and orders Viral DRM to explain its bases for jurisdiction and joinder or else the case will fall apart. Four defendants submitted 512(g) counternotifications and thus agreed to jurisdiction in YouTube’s home court (N.D. Jurisdiction.
Jackie Schafer: I started out as a litigator at Paul Weiss, but spent most of my career in public service as an assistant attorney general, where I was regularly briefing and arguing cases before the state appellate courts in Alaska and Washington state. ’ Most cases are won or lost based on the writing.
The court ruled on Hyponix and NinjaSafe’s requests for damages from the bond, dismissal with prejudice, and attorneys’ fees. The court pays out some of the bond but rejects the other relief. The court noted the deficiencies in the defendants’ alleged infringement. Proximate Damage.
In advance of the Moody ruling, the editors of the Cato Supreme Court Review asked me to submit a book chapter based on my inevitable comprehensive post. I emailed this correction to the court, which they have since made. (I District court June 30, 2021 opinion enjoining most of the law. Alito slip opinion at 7.
VAILL is prioritizing partnerships across sectors – courts, law firms, legal aid organizations, alternative providers, and others – to test ideas and develop prototype AI applications that solve real legal needs. They’re same thing with some courts. What isn’t. Here, test this. So Greg Lambert 1:50 yeah. But extending beyond that.
It’s not in the data To better describe the current situation and the importance of these insights, consider the following axiom I’ve been hearing for years: “It’s in the data.” In this case the client was concerned about setting an unfavorable precedent with a court loss, so a $900k fee was fine by them. It was a frontline worker.
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. state and federal court decisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law. Why Even Do This Project?
What makes it unique: Legal IT Insider’s Editor-in-Chief is Former City Solicitor Caroline Hill, and the site’s articles benefit from her practiced eye. Their articles offer comprehensive legaltech conference coverage, product walkthroughs, and more. Their articles embrace thought leadership and pose fundamental, altruistic questions.
This tool allows law firms to analyze aggregated and normalized state trial court data to gain competitive intelligence across cases, practice areas, and performance. Collecting this unstructured data from county courts is very challenging, but provides valuable business insights. So that was really never possible before.
This Article undertakes an examination of composite transactions, evaluating advantages and disadvantages of different approaches. In addition, this Article presents new survey results that shed light on the counterintuitive nature of current law. More specifically, the article advances three central claims. constitutional law.
A motion to dismiss is a motion filed on behalf of a defendant asking the court to dismiss the plaintiff’s case. federal court. Or, the court could lack personal jurisdiction over the defendant, such as where a defendant sued in state court is an out-of-state resident lacking minimum contacts with the state. In some U.S.
For those reasons, I strongly suspect this will not be the last we hear of this case. Supreme Court. Although some of the people using the machine may directly infringe copyrights, courts analyze the machine owner’s liability under the rubric of contributory infringement, not direct infringement. July 17, 2023).
In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals. We proceeded from there.
markus-spiske-iar-afB0QQw-unsplash Stephanie Wilkins recently wrote an excellent article entitled, “Is Attorney E-Discovery Incompetence the Elephant in the Room?” So many lawyers hear and look at e-discovery and the issues it brings, and their eyes just glaze over. Why are lawyers incompetent when it comes to e-Discovery: Hubris.
Baseball Clubs, the United States Supreme Court ruled that baseball was a “purely state affair” and was not subject to the Sherman Antitrust Act. [1] 2] In 1972, the Court reaffirmed and held that Congress should determine whether to remove the exemption. [3] Nat’l League of Pro. 7] Microsoft, stock images. 7] Microsoft, stock images.
I read dozens of posts and articles about ChatGPT every day. In the sanctions hearing last week, the lawyer said he was “both embarrassed, humiliated and extremely remorseful” and said his reputation had suffered. Originally posted in OBA Courts and More. So it’s important to understand the basics. Some content updated.
Invention evokes images of giants like Thomas Edison and eureka moments — “the flash of creative genius,” as the Supreme Court justice William O. The July 15, 2023 article entitled “Can A.I. Last month, the Senate held a hearing on A.I. Douglas once put it.” Invent?” ( [link] ) included these comments: The U.S. and patents.
In this article, we will delve into the transformative impact of technology for lawyers. Video conferencing, online document signing, and virtual courthearings have become commonplace. Remote Court Proceedings and E-Filing: The advent of technology has significantly impacted court proceedings.
Supreme Court. Over the years, you can just go through and look at federal Indian law, and see articles on plenary power, or preemption, or trust responsibility. First, it was in the discovery doctrine and it’s so important to hear that doctrine right. Monette talks with host Kris Turner about Brackeen v.
You can write original articles, post videos, share infographics, or repost relevant content from other sources. If you don’t hear back from them, follow up with a gentle reminder or a new piece of information. This article is one in a series we are publishing on law firm marketing on LinkedIn. a national legal marketing agency.
That was my primary message when I gave testimony about AI in the corporate and legal space at a hearing on “Emerging Issues in AI” held by the Illinois House Judiciary – Civil Committee and House Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, and IT Committee on November 2, 2023. Third : AI can help us transform courts and government services.
We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Traction: Active in all 50 states, we have a network of over 12,000 attorneys, 12,000+ expert witnesses, 300+ court reporters, and 150+ interpreters.
What youll hear today is the discussion it generated, followed by Bobs thoughts on what it produced. The two speakers do summarize key points from Bobs articles, but they also add interpretations and perspectives that are nowhere to be found in the original source material. Littler, local everywhere.
CDT Illinois Supreme Court Justice Mary K. Supreme Court Virtual 12 p.m. Rotskoff, Deputy Administrator, Litigation, ARDC (moderator) Karen McNaught, Magistrate of the Central District of Illinois Lisa Holder White, Illinois Supreme Court Justice Mark C. CDT Illinois Supreme Court Justice Elizabeth M. Belleville 9 a.m.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content