This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The court issues him a chastising warning against using unauthorized pseudonyms. In this case, Affleck posted 38 comments on Harvard Crimson articles, using 2 different names (not specified by the court). The court implies that perhaps Affleck’s comments were anti-Zionist? ” Cites to Duffer , Spreadbury v.
This article gives some background on Fyk’s story). His lawsuit against Facebook was dashed by Section 230 in the district court. The Supreme Court denied cert. Thereafter, he tried to vacate the district court decision, which triggered a new cycle of rejection by the district court, the 9th Circuit, and the Supreme Court.
Even if an employer owns the device, collecting browser history, app usage, or personal messages can trigger violations of the Stored Communications Act (SCA), the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), and other federallaws. Traceability, not just policy, is what regulators and courts increasingly expect.
The Court of Justice of the European Union (“ CJEU ”) issued a judgment on the 9 th of February 2023 (docket no. C-453/21) , which addresses the question of the dismissal of a Data Protection Officer (“ DPO ”) and the interpretation of Article 38 of the EU GDPR. Question 4 – What amounts to a conflict of interest?
This is Part 2 of a two-part article on the recent U.S. Supreme Court TransUnion decision. On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a significant opinion on standing in the context of consumer class actions in TransUnion LLC v. In Part 1 , we discussed the implications of the decision for standing in cyber cases. The Opinion.
This is Part 1 of a two-part article on the recent U.S. Supreme Court TransUnion decision. Individuals whose personal information was compromised in a data breach have had mixed success in bringing lawsuits in federalcourt against the companies that held their data. Ramirez , No. 20-297, slip op.
On 1 July 2021, [1] FederalLaw No. 236-FZ on the Internet Activities of Foreign Entities in the Russian Federation (the “Law”) [2] came into force, requiring establishment of local presence, such as a branch, a representative office, or a subsidiary, for foreign Internet companies whose activities are focused on Russian users.
Federal administrative law impacts nearly every element of our lives. The Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., 837 (1984), created a two-part framework for litigation involving congressional statutory law and regulatory agencies that enforce that law. 11] Image: US District Court. Relentless and Loper Cases A.
Then reach out to its editor with an article idea. They may take common questions they hear from clients, develop questions in a new facet of their practice area where they are interested in gaining clients, and provide updates on local, state or federallaw impacting their practice area. Here are a few no-cost ideas.
On 1 March 2021, FederalLaw No. 519-FZ on Amendments to the FederalLaw on Personal Data dated 30 December 2020 (the “Law”) came into force. 2] If no period is prescribed by the court order, the transfer of personal data must be terminated within three business days after the court order comes into force. [3]
We’ll also dive into how to make your law firm website accessible and why, above all, accessibility matters and should be strived for. The ADA is a federallaw enacted in 1990. Because of this, it has fallen to the courts to determine how the ADA applies to websites. Let’s get moving! What is the ADA?
How Employees Are Using ChatGPT at Work Dozens of articles have been written about how ChatGPT will replace certain jobs. For our upcoming webcast on the role of ChatGPT in the legal profession , ChatGPT came up with questions about maintaining privilege, checking for accuracy and disclosing the role of ChatGPT to clients and courts.
ESIGN, UETA, and laws governing e-signatures in the US In the US, there are two primary laws governing electronic signatures: The Electronic Signature in Global and National Commerce (ESIGN) Act is a federallaw that serves to create a US standard for electronic signatures. Are electronic signatures valid in court?
7 Within years of the advisory, cigarette sales declined significantly, largely due to the new regulations and laws implemented to combat the crisis. 8 Just one year after the advisory, Congress passed the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1965, which had a substantial effect on reducing the number of smokers.
This is Part 2 in a two-part series of articles about facial recognition laws in the United States. In this part, we assess where the law seems to be heading and offer some practical risk reduction strategies. Federal and State Legislation There is currently no federallaw that specifically regulates biometric privacy.
And this is one that the US Supreme Court has recognized is not really a bright line, in the case called Carpenter vs. United States from 2018. This is a case where the Supreme Court held that the government needed to get a warrant in order to obtain the cell phone locations of a person over a period of time.
Miller Miller wanted to create a book “by students, for students,” so he focused his research around recent law school graduates. Regardless of whether you are new to practicing law or an experienced attorney, this book is an excellent reference point. BUSINESS BRIBES: CORPORATE CORRUPTION AND THE COURTS by Cecil C.
The first two sections of this article summarize arguments made by Citron in her new book The Fight for Privacy. State and federallaws prohibit public and private entities from discriminating against individuals based on their race, age, national origin, religion, gender, disability, and sexual orientation.
Further articles discuss special circumstances that may arise for some couples, such as those with minor children , substantial assets , or military careers. The Probate center explains the duties of an executor , such as taking inventory of an estate, filing a petition with the probate court, and managing assets during probate.
For example, a service member who violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) may face a court-martial or a less formal disciplinary procedure. What Is an Article 15? An Article 15 is a type of non-judicial disciplinary procedure in the armed forces. How Are Special and General Courts-Martial Different?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content