This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There are three major developing trends in family law that were going to focus more on in the near future: Alternate Dispute Resolution Over the past several years, we have seen a larger focus on keeping matters out of court. Undoubtedly, we will see more focus on this in 2025 and the years ahead. What are the 2025 Family Law Trends?
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. Showing Substantial Similarity of Generative AI Outputs.
13, 2025, by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), hours after a Monday court ruling reinstated the reporting requirement. 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline pending a further order of the court. ” The case is still being litigated. .” ” The case is still being litigated.
” The plaintiffs brought a pre-enforcement challenge to the law, but the court denies a preliminary injunction. The court explains: Deepfakes are image, audio, or video files that mimic real or nonexistent people saying and doing things that never happened. The court does realize the overlap here, right? ” Hmm.
The court says that the plaintiffs’ allegations treat AFF as the data controller and Confirm ID as the data processor, and that’s sufficient to acknowledge the affiliate relationship. Second, the court turns to the TOS formation question. On the minus side, the court notes that the call-to-actions are in smaller gray font.
The court dismisses the case entirely with leave to amend. The court responds: “Plaintiffs do not clearly identify the ‘product’ at issue or the ‘design defect’ it allegedly contains.” ” The court responds: Many of the statements simply describe what content is allowed on the platforms.
When most people think of a law degree, they envision a career in traditional fields such as litigation,corporate law, or criminal defense. 9 Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) : For those uninterested in litigation, ADR roles such as mediation and arbitration offer opportunities to resolve conflicts outside of court.
As the first quarter of 2025 draws to a close and we look ahead to the spring, important changes to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) regarding the use of AI in the courtroom are on the horizon. 7, 2025 ) , Tab 3A Report of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules (Dec. See Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules Agenda Book (Nov.
As we previewed in our 2024 AI year in review , one of the big areas to watch in 2025 will be how much discovery courts are prepared to order into the inner workings of AI companies, especially in the face of arguments that discovery would reveal trade secrets or would be overbroad in cases based on specific claimed works. OpenAI, Inc.
2025 WL 961473 (W.D.N.Y. March 31, 2025) This case involves the service Joybuy, which listed items for sale in Walmart.coms marketplace. The court is unclear about how Joybuy operates, but it appears that Joybuy (via the entity JD) runs its own online marketplace. Omnia Studios Ltd. JD E-Commerce America Ltd.,
After a decade of litigation and a pivotal Supreme Court ruling from 2023, the legal battle between Jack Daniels and VIP Products has taken yet another turn, this time back in favor of Jack Daniels. On remand from the Supreme Court in the case VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniels Properties Inc., Continue Reading
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
Given that they are litigating 512(f), your wish was partially granted. The court refuses Temu’s preliminary injunction request. Shein Technology LLC , 2025 WL 445187 (D.C.D.C. Day to Day Imports * Court Mistakenly Thinks Copyright Owners Have a Duty to Police InfringementSunny Factory v. Alper Automotive v.
The district court agrees with the plaintiff. The court adds: “the purpose of Section 230 immunityto encourage Internet service providers to voluntarily monitor and edit user-generated speech in internet trafficwould not be served by protecting Capital One from liability in this case.” 2025 WL 606194 (W.D.
On February 18, 2025, at The Masters Conference in Miami, I had the privilege of speaking on a panel alongside Matt Rasmussen (ModeOne), Alex Lewis (Kuro Group), and Brittany Leonard (General Counsel) to discuss one of the most pressing challenges in eDiscovery today: Modern Data Management. Red Wolf Energy Trading v.
We’ll discuss both the benefits and potential pitfalls of AI adoption and examine recent guidance from the ABA and the courts. 22, 2025, 12-1 p.m. 23, 2025, 1-2 p.m. 24, 2025, 12-1 p.m. 24, 2025, 12-1 p.m. Session 1: Wednesday, Jan.
From artificial intelligence cases to a federal judiciary pressed to use a years-old high court ruling to curb securities fraud cases, and more—here are the four securities litigation trends to watch in 2025.
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment.” Unsurprisingly, on remand, the district court declared the rest unconstitutional.
Privacy concerns require forensic teams to limit collections to court-ordered data only, fostering trust in both the legal team and custodians. Shah noted that in a recent case involving Uber, the court moved closer to treating linked files like traditional attachments, signaling a shift in judicial expectations.
Invisible Narratives sought an ex parte TRO to prevent that from happening, which the court grants. The court relies on 512(f) as the basis of the TRO: “Invisible Narratives has presented evidence that Next Level was neither the original creator of Skibidi Toilet nor the lawful copyright owner of Skibidi Toilet characters.
The Illinois Supreme Court announced this week amendments to Rule 299 that will double compensation for an attorney appointed by a court in Illinois to represent an indigent party. The amended Rule raises attorney compensation to $150 per hour, up from its previous minimum of $75 per hour. The amendments are effective on Jan.
the percentage of in-house legal budgets spent on technology is expected to increase threefold by 2025 from 2020 levels as legal departments “increase spending on technology to reduce the dependency on outside counsel, address COVID-19, and satisfy a long-overdue need to modernize, digitize and automate legal work.”.
2 eDiscovery Electronic discovery (eDiscovery) tools continue to evolve, enabling legal professionals to manage large volumes of electronic data more efficiently during investigations and the discovery phase of litigation. What Technology Do Lawyers Use?
Weve gathered the best highlights with those whove walked the halls of Congress and presided over our nations highest courts because their insights dont just shape policies and decisions; they offer valuable lessons for anyone navigating the complexities of law, leadership, and life itself. Takeaways from Justices Chief Justice Nathan L.
For more highlights, explore the 2024 Clio Cloud Conference in Review , and dont wait to secure your ticket for the 2025 Clio Cloud Conference in Boston! Clio File Clio File was also unveiled in July, giving users the ability to file court documents directly from Clio Manage. Goodbye 2024, hello 2025! Want to learn more?
This guide breaks down the most important personal injury statistics for 2025, going beyond the numbers to show you how these trends can improve your strategic decisions, help you set realistic client expectations, and ultimately deliver better results. Plaintiffs in federal court received an average of $75,000 in damages ( NOLO ).
According to the court, scrapers take active steps that serve no purpose but to trick X into given them not a second, not a third, but a millionth turn to see the sites (citations omitted). But its motion to amend its 17200 claim to add unfair acts was denied, as the court found that X Corp. Now, because the court accepted X Corp.s
Screen 1: Screen 2: Screen 3: In what I thought was a surprise ruling, the district court rejected formation on/across all three screens. As usual, the court then discusses standard contract formation principles (conspicuous notice of terms and unambiguous manifestation of assent) to figure out if the TOS is enforceable. ClassPass Inc.
If passed, the bill goes into effect July 1, 2024 with the first round of DPIAs due July 1, 2025. The District Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in the Bonta case on July 27th. Recently, the Senate Judiciary Committee heard the bill for informational purposes. The bill is currently pending approval by both chambers.
Thats the basis for a recent opinion from a Florida federal district court that could have major implications for online services CSAM detection and reporting practices. Now, however, a district court decision suggests that providers can no longer take it for granted that they wont face liability for reporting non-CSAM.
The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. ” BTW, I disagree with the court’s summation of the Internet Brands case; I feel the Ninth Circuit got that one wrong because that case was always about third-party content. .”
This is a long-running litigation battle over Google’s advertising practices. Four years and 900+ docket entries later, the SNDY court holds that two plaintiffs’ claims must go to arbitration. The court doesn’t provide a screenshot of that display, but it suggests that the advertisers actually saw the notice.
2025 WL 89191 (S.D.N.Y. 14, 2025) This cases involves two videos, one involving Michael Jordan that someone posted to Twitter (seemingly without permission?), The court doesn’t discuss the Hunley case at all. Mediaite LLC, 2025 WL 89226 (S.D.N.Y. 2025 WL 208768 (W.D. Townsquare Media, Inc., Lynk Media LLC v.
Tamashiro, LLM 2025 The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed a NonCompete Rule designated to promote competition and employees rights. If the rule becomes effective, there may be a surge in trade secret litigation and patent filing and increased scrutiny when hiring to avoid litigation risks. By Andreia M.
However, the case fell apart on further proceedings when the court reconsidered jurisdiction and joinder. It’s so typical that SAD Scheme cases can’t survive actual scrutiny, unlike the deferential reviews courts apply at the ex parte TRO stage. Sloppy or nefariousporque no los dos?
In its most recent ruling, the trial court granted Facebook’s anti-SLAPP motion and awarded Facebook nearly $700k in attorneys’ fees. The appellate court affirms. I remind you that the Calise ruling was from the 9th Circuit, while this is a state appellate court. 2025 WL 783250 (Cal. March 12, 2025).
The court summarizes the facts: The two videos at issue comprise excerpts from Lakeway City Council meetings and a presentation Kilgore gave as mayor to Lakeway residents, sitting at a desk in front of United States and Texas flags. On January 6, 2025, the supervising judge summarily approved the magistrate judge’s recommendations.
My blog post on the district court opinion (I focused on the 230 issue, but this ruling turns on the failure of the prima facie elements). The court says that allegation (and others) is too unspecific. Second, her track record in court is littered with futility. March 27, 2025). Google, Illoominate v. CAIR, and Loomer v.
The district court dismissed Daily Kos based on the sui generis exclusion. ” The appeals court reverses the dismissal based on the sui generis exception and sends the case back to the district court for more proceedings. The Daily Kos , 2025 WL 855280 (Nev. On appeal, things go sideways. And for what benefit?
March 10, 2025) Curiosity Stream is a paywalled site for documentary videos. The court doesn’t use the -wrap terminology at all (YAY!). Courts should not assume that a privacy policy was meant to be purely informational. March 11, 2025) Note: this time, Judge Wilkinson is in the majority. CuriosityStream, Inc. ,
A prior ruling summarized the facts the court describes as “harrowing”: In April 2022, Defendant Bendjy Charles (Charles) and Romelus raped Plaintiff. 2025 WL 336741 (S.D. 30, 2025) MORE ON DOE V. The court denied summary judgment for both sides, likely sending this case to trial. Fenix International, Ltd.
Six weeks later, the Supreme Court–moving at lightning speed by its standards–unanimously affirmed the ban in a per curiam opinion. S. __ (2025). Perhaps in the short run by the app stores, but otherwise, TikTok now has two presidents working on its behalf to undo the censorship imposed by Congress and the Supreme Court.
On the day before the law’s effectiveness, the district court enjoins parts of the law but says that other parts may be constitutional. The court subsequently enjoined all upheld provisions until February 1 to see if the Ninth Circuit will extend the injunction pending its review. The court says that’s not so.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content