This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Our top-five European dataprotection developments from February are: European Commission publishes guidelines on prohibited AI practices : The EU Commission has published non-binding guidance on the EU AI Acts prohibited use cases. The ban entered into force on 2 February 2025. Spanish Telecomm Provider Fined 1.2
Candidate, 2025 No one wants to be left holding the bag after a break-in, but for chief information security officers (CISOs), the risk of liability is ever-present. They are responsible for overseeing an organizations dataprotection measures, risk management strategies, overall security infrastructure, among other critical responsibilities.
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment.” Unsurprisingly, on remand, the district court declared the rest unconstitutional.
GDPR one-stop-shop: Businesses wishing to take advantage of the GDPR one-stop-shop system should take note of a new digest, published by the European DataProtection Board, which analyses the decisions made by so-called Lead Supervisory Authorities in this context.
Our top five European dataprotection developments from June are: Non-material damage under GDPR: The CJEU clarified the scope of compensation for non-material damage in the context of identity theft and data subjects’ fear that their personal data had been exposed. To subscribe to the Data Blog, please click here.
If passed, the bill goes into effect July 1, 2024 with the first round of DPIAs due July 1, 2025. Among their targets were the DataProtection Impact Assessment requirements, which NetChoice argued amounted to prior restraint and compelled speech. The bill is currently pending approval by both chambers.
Nevertheless, when considering the appropriateness of protective measures, the obligation rests on the data controller to prove that they met the required standard. The rulings arose at the request of both the German and Lithuanian courts, following local administrative fines. The Court ruled that: “Scoring” (i.e.,
Jack also announced exciting new Clio features for 2025, including automated workflows, custom reporting, and new payment methods. To cap off his exhilarating keynote, Jack revealed that ClioCon 2025 will take place in Boston, Massachusetts. Secure your tickets for ClioCon 2025 today!
Note that the data localization prohibition in this Regulation applies to individual EU Member States’ laws; it does not preclude the EU from implementing data localization requirements. The restrictions on transfers of non-personal data appear to serve two main purposes. X (Recent Council versions remove this obligation.)
This contrasts with the VCDPA’s and the UCPA’s definition of “sale,” which is limited to an exchange of personal data for only monetary consideration. The CTPA bolsters opt-out rights by requiring controllers to recognize a global opt-out preference by January 1, 2025. CTPA § 6(e)(1)(A)(ii). CTPA § 11(b).
Alleged violators may seek additional judicial review in federal district court. The Final Rule takes effect 90 days after publication in the Federal Register, which is expected for January 8, 2025, although certain compliance requirements will not take effect until 270 days following publication.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content