This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In July, Professors Vikram Amar & Michael Dorf addressed many key decisions by the Supreme Court, discussing the ways they may have changed the legal landscape. Our trusted professors are now back again to provide an engaging dialogue as to what is on the docket for the upcoming Supreme Court Term. credit hours. More Questions?
Creating an effective lawyer blog post in 2025 requires a strategic approach that combines timeless principles with modern technological advancements. To keep your content fresh and valuable, make it a priority to stay informed about industry changes, such as new regulations, court decisions, and shifts in public opinion.
This collaboration features award-winning legal technologists Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell as they test drive Green Filings new Auto File tool, designed to read and incorporate filing content directly from the court documents.
There are three major developing trends in family law that were going to focus more on in the near future: Alternate Dispute Resolution Over the past several years, we have seen a larger focus on keeping matters out of court. Undoubtedly, we will see more focus on this in 2025 and the years ahead. What are the 2025 Family Law Trends?
In July, Professors Vikram Amar & Michael Dorf addressed many key decisions by the Supreme Court, discussing the ways they may have changed the legal landscape. Our trusted professors are now back again to provide an engaging dialogue as to what is on the docket for the upcoming Supreme Court Term. credit hours. More Questions?
The JMOL had two primary conclusions: First , that the CFAA has extraterritorial application, and therefore it was appropriate for this court to apply the CFAA here. But this court says, not so. It wanted a worldwide, enforceable court order to get Booking and its affiliates to stop reselling Ryanair flights. Van Buren v.
Extensively citing Chabolla , the court rejects the arbitration request. The court says Plex’s relationship context cuts against TOS formation. The court’s treatment of the sign-up screen’s call-to-action is perplexing (no pun intended). Plex offers free video streaming.
” The plaintiffs brought a pre-enforcement challenge to the law, but the court denies a preliminary injunction. The court explains: Deepfakes are image, audio, or video files that mimic real or nonexistent people saying and doing things that never happened. The court does realize the overlap here, right? ” Hmm.
Pandabuy initially no-showed in the case, so the court converted the TRO to a preliminary injunction. Pandabuy eventually showed up in court and explained how it operates more like a passive facilitator than a seller or manufacturer. This additional context prompted the court to dissolve the injunction. SAD Scheme Cases Suck.
The ban entered into force on 2 February 2025. However, although persuasive, the Guidelines are not authoritative and the EU AI Acts application is likely to be refined by its practical implementation and the courts in the future.
Candidate, 2025 No one wants to be left holding the bag after a break-in, but for chief information security officers (CISOs), the risk of liability is ever-present. District Court for the Southern District of New York suggests that CISOs might be outside of point-blank range. By Gaurav Lalsinghani, J.D.
The defendant claimed that the First Amendment barred the lawsuit “because the claims would interfere with Defendant’s First Amendment discretion to choose its own content moderation policy,” citing the O’Handley district court case. The court disagrees. 2025 WL 819567 (C.D. ” What? ” What?
The court says that the plaintiffs’ allegations treat AFF as the data controller and Confirm ID as the data processor, and that’s sufficient to acknowledge the affiliate relationship. Second, the court turns to the TOS formation question. On the minus side, the court notes that the call-to-actions are in smaller gray font.
13, 2025, by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), hours after a Monday court ruling reinstated the reporting requirement. 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline pending a further order of the court. The injunction was issued in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. Garland , No. 4:24-CV-478 (E.D.
The court credits Robinsons allegations that Roblox employees reviewed and approved Binello’s upload of Robinson’s copyrighted work, created a copy of that work, and stored that copy on the Roblox server. On this basis, the court distinguished VHT v. This court didnt do that. Robinson alleges that it was.
The court issues him a chastising warning against using unauthorized pseudonyms. In this case, Affleck posted 38 comments on Harvard Crimson articles, using 2 different names (not specified by the court). The court implies that perhaps Affleck’s comments were anti-Zionist? 2025 WL 330577 (D. Raycom , and more.
The court dismisses the case entirely with leave to amend. The court responds: “Plaintiffs do not clearly identify the ‘product’ at issue or the ‘design defect’ it allegedly contains.” ” The court responds: Many of the statements simply describe what content is allowed on the platforms.
Secure your tickets for the 2025 Clio Cloud Conference now! For instance, you’ll see language in Supreme Court opinions suggesting that no one can penetrate the mind. Don’t miss the biggest and best event in legal tech— Get your passes for the 2025 Clio Cloud Conference now! Want to hear from more inspiring speakers?
The Illinois Supreme Court has released its new policy on generative AI use in courts , effective January 1, 2025. The court recognizes that AI misuse could jeopardize due process or equal protection, warning that misleading AI-generated content that creates bias or interferes with truth-finding will not be tolerated.
March 18, 2025) This case involved the completely AI-generated work, “A Recent Entrance to Paradise”: The copyright applicant, Thaler, disclaimed any human involvement in the work’s creation. The district court ruled it wasn’t copyrightable. ” The court also isn’t sold on the irreparable injury.
2025 WL 961473 (W.D.N.Y. March 31, 2025) This case involves the service Joybuy, which listed items for sale in Walmart.coms marketplace. The court is unclear about how Joybuy operates, but it appears that Joybuy (via the entity JD) runs its own online marketplace. Omnia Studios Ltd. JD E-Commerce America Ltd.,
The paper also sued because the county barred county employees from talking to reporters, but the court says this equal protection claim is duplicative of the retaliation one. BRIEF / February 25, 2025 Read the ruling here. BINGHAMTON, N.Y.
Talk about court red-handed Thomas Claburn Demonstrating yet again that uncritically trusting the output of generative AI is dangerous, attorneys involved in a product liability lawsuit have apologized to the presiding judge for submitting documents that cite non-existent legal cases.
As we previewed in our 2024 AI year in review , one of the big areas to watch in 2025 will be how much discovery courts are prepared to order into the inner workings of AI companies, especially in the face of arguments that discovery would reveal trade secrets or would be overbroad in cases based on specific claimed works. OpenAI, Inc.
The district court granted summary judgment to YouTube. Qian seemed to claim that he didn’t get any notice and explanation about YouTube’s actions as he thought the TOS required, but the court disagrees. YouTube, LLC , 2025 WL 582785 (2d Cir. Qian sued YouTube for breaching its TOS. The Second Circuit affirms.
After a decade of litigation and a pivotal Supreme Court ruling from 2023, the legal battle between Jack Daniels and VIP Products has taken yet another turn, this time back in favor of Jack Daniels. On remand from the Supreme Court in the case VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniels Properties Inc., Continue Reading
Despite the busy 2024 litigation year against companies offering AI platforms in 2024, significant intellectual property questions remain unanswered as the calendar turns to 2025. 2025 may bring some clarity to the legal status of AI, including through highly anticipated guidance from the U.S.
The district court said “There are elements of both [clickwrap and sign-in-wrap] here.” The district court also noted that this screen appeared after the consumer had already made their initial purchase, so it’s a post-transaction process, which raises consideration issues. March 19, 2025). Homeaglow, Inc. ,
The district court agrees with the plaintiff. The court adds: “the purpose of Section 230 immunityto encourage Internet service providers to voluntarily monitor and edit user-generated speech in internet trafficwould not be served by protecting Capital One from liability in this case.” 2025 WL 606194 (W.D.
Improve document drafting at your firm Did you know Clio Draft can cut your drafting time by 80% with auto-fill features, templates, and a library of court forms? When comparing prices, think about how many users or seats youll need, and see which solutions offer an annual discount. Elevate your practice with Clio Draft today.
Staying up-to-date with rules and regulations Court rules and regulations are the bread and butter of paralegal practice, especially since paralegals often need to know these in more detail than attorneys. The skill-based CLEs will necessarily also focus on the common tech tools in use.
If youd like to hear from cutting-edge speakers on the movement toward trauma-informed justice and other relevant topics in the legal industry, be sure to register for ClioCon 2025. Many trauma-informed practices have already been implemented in court systems that deal with sensitive populations, such as juveniles or military veterans.
The court refuses Temu’s preliminary injunction request. Shein Technology LLC , 2025 WL 445187 (D.C.D.C. 9, 2025) Prior Posts on Section 512(f) * Copyright Battles Over City Council Videos * Record Label Sends Bogus Takedown Notice, Defeats 512(f) Claim AnywayWhite v. Case Citation : Whaleco Inc. Alper Automotive v.
White now claims that DistroKid infringed his copyrights to the beats, both directly and indirectly (the court dismissed the indirect claims last year). The court summarizes the doctrine (comparing the Cablevision and EMI v. ” The court says that this isn’t what the BMP v. Ugh, so much going wrong here.
At the beginning of the 2024-2025 school year, the Charleston School of launched its renamed and reorganized Center for Diversity in the Legal Profession. Hernandez 2024-2025 Sol Blatt Jr. 2141 (2023) ︎ Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action programs in college admissions – SCOTUSblog ︎ Id. Harvard , 3 the U.S.
As the first quarter of 2025 draws to a close and we look ahead to the spring, important changes to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) regarding the use of AI in the courtroom are on the horizon. 7, 2025 ) , Tab 3A Report of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules (Dec. See Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules Agenda Book (Nov.
The court says that Viral DRM’s exclusive “management” rights is not the same as ownership or an exclusive license to the copyright. The court says that Viral DRM doesn’t have standing to enforce the copyright. 2025 WL 660250 (N.D. 2025 WL 660250 (N.D. Case Citation : Viral DRM LLC v.
9 Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) : For those uninterested in litigation, ADR roles such as mediation and arbitration offer opportunities to resolve conflicts outside of court. last visited Feb 27, 2025). St Francis School of Law (2021), [link] (last visited Feb 27, 2025). link] (last visited Feb 27, 2025).
On February 18, 2025, at The Masters Conference in Miami, I had the privilege of speaking on a panel alongside Matt Rasmussen (ModeOne), Alex Lewis (Kuro Group), and Brittany Leonard (General Counsel) to discuss one of the most pressing challenges in eDiscovery today: Modern Data Management. Red Wolf Energy Trading v.
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment.” Unsurprisingly, on remand, the district court declared the rest unconstitutional.
The court takes two elements off the table immediately: “Plaintiffs do not contest that MMA was a user of an interactive computer service, nor that MMA received the Kane Email from another information content provider.” USI Insurance Services, LLC , 2025 WL 711113 (N.D. This turns into an easy Section 230 dismissal.
We’ll discuss both the benefits and potential pitfalls of AI adoption and examine recent guidance from the ABA and the courts. 22, 2025, 12-1 p.m. 23, 2025, 1-2 p.m. 24, 2025, 12-1 p.m. 24, 2025, 12-1 p.m. Session 1: Wednesday, Jan.
Privacy concerns require forensic teams to limit collections to court-ordered data only, fostering trust in both the legal team and custodians. Shah noted that in a recent case involving Uber, the court moved closer to treating linked files like traditional attachments, signaling a shift in judicial expectations.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content