2023 Intellectual Property Lawsuit 
Eric Goldman
MARCH 9, 2023
I’m pleased to share a draft of a new paper, “ A SAD New Category of Abusive Intellectual Property Litigation.” To that end, I am giving a couple of public talks on the paper: Tarrant County Bar Association , Texas A&M Law School, Fort Worth, TX, March 27, 2023. Free RSVP! I would welcome yours.
Justia Legal Marketing & Technology blog
MAY 4, 2023
The evolution of generative AI (artificial intelligence) has captured the attention of many Americans during the first few months of 2023. Already, lawsuits involving AI-generated works have been filed in federal courts from coast to coast. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The North Carolina Journey of Law and Technology
FEBRUARY 1, 2024
However, independent designers are accusing Shein of something much more sinister: systematic and rampant intellectual property theft amounting to racketeering. We will vigorously defend ourselves against this lawsuit and any claims that are without merit.” Shein is no stranger to lawsuits. What’s Next?
3 Geeks and a Law Blog
APRIL 7, 2023
Professor Dobbs runs the IP and Transactional Law Clinic at Richmond and explains that the clinic provides an opportunity for law students to work directly with clients on intellectual property matters, such as copyright and trademark protection, under her supervision. We don’t do patents, since it’s for variety of reasons.
Legal Expert Connections
FEBRUARY 25, 2024
The Numbers Speak: Ad Spending on the Rise In 2023, nearly 800,000 television advertisements were dedicated to mass litigation, amounting to a cost of over $160 million. For instance, during the height of lawsuits targeting Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller in 2019, the industry spent nearly $300 million on television spots.
Richmond Journal of Law and Technology
NOVEMBER 27, 2023
16] Companies accomplish this by first suing generic-manufacturing companies for patent infringement, and then settling the lawsuit by paying them to stay out of the market in what is known as a reverse-payment settlement. [17] 19] The lawsuit ended in a settlement with Gilead agreeing to pay Teva, the supposed infringer, $1.5
Eric Goldman
AUGUST 1, 2023
Instagram, LLC , 2023 WL 4554649 (9th Cir. July 17, 2023). Second, it fits better with the “opt-out” design of the Internet, so it makes it easier to dispose of “troll-like” cases like the Hunley lawsuit. See James Gibson, Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in Intellectual Property Law , 116 Yale L.J. 882 (2006).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
106 
Let's personalize your content