Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 26, 2023

2023 WL 5017711 (D. Where the motion to dismiss concerns questions of law, additional discovery is not required. Therefore, as MindGeek’s motion to dismiss concerns only questions of law, no discovery is required to rule on the motion to dismiss. ” * Doe v. Grant, 2021 Ariz. LEXIS 1327 (Az. Superior Ct. Superior Ct.

Defendant 98

Defendant Failure-to-appear Court Lawsuit 98

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 2, 2023

“Duffer seeks to hold Nextdoor, a service provider, liable for its failure to remove material posted by users of its website. . “Duffer seeks to hold Nextdoor, a service provider, liable for its failure to remove material posted by users of its website. 2023 WL 7165042 (D. Third-party Content. Nextdoor, Inc.

Failure-to-appear 98

Failure-to-appear Federal law Defendant Lawsuit 98

Eric Goldman

MARCH 22, 2025

Laura Heymann (William & Mary Law) Jeffrey Hunt Angie Jin Josh King Jonathan Klinger Prof. Stacey Lantagne (now of Western New England Law) Prof. Christa Laser (Cleveland State Law) Prof. Yassine Lefouili (Toulouse School of Economics) David Levine (Elon Law) Yoram Lichtenstein Prof. Jeff Kosseff (U.S.

Law 52

Law Law Intellectual Property Failure-to-appear 52

Eric Goldman

JUNE 7, 2023

” This does not persuade the judge: the Court must treat Defendants as publishers or speakers, regardless of how their claims are framed, because their theories of liability plainly turn on Defendants’ alleged failure to monitor and remove third-party content. To get around Section 230, the plaintiffs attempted the Lemmon v.

Failure-to-appear 118

Failure-to-appear Defendant Lawsuit Court 118

Eric Goldman

APRIL 29, 2023

I’ve documented dozens of ways that 512(f) claims have failed, so the failure of this claim isn’t surprising. April 21, 2023) Prior Posts on Section 512(f) * You’re a Fool if You Think You Can Win a 512(f) Case–Security Police and Fire Professionals v. See this ruling for another example of the same parlor trick).

Court 105

Court Failure-to-appear Lawsuit State law 105

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 29, 2023

Ultimately, the alleged “defect” here is only relevant to Doe’s injury to the extent it made it easier or more difficult for other users to communicate with Doe, and thus Doe seeks to hold Grindr liable for its failure to regulate third party content. Doe sued Grindr for strict products liability, negligence, and FOSTA. ICS Provider.

Lawsuit 98

Lawsuit Court Defendant Failure-to-appear 98

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey , Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section 2(c) is consistent with the First Amendment, but will it clarify how to balance trademark and free speech rights? VIP Products (2023) opinion and its other trademark cases.

Court 106

Court Law Law Failure-to-appear 106