Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 11, 2023

The court summarizes: “Meta claims that it raised issues with Plaintiffs, including “nominative fair use,” “commentary,” and “the un-likelihood of confusion based on the appearance of the marks in the actual marketplace, as they will be encountered by consumers.””

Failure-to-appear 115

Failure-to-appear e-records Court Law 115

Eric Goldman

AUGUST 11, 2023

Two top-line takeaways you might get from this post: A two-click formation process avoids the risk of judges moving the goalposts about formation, and If you are amending your TOS, have an airtight plan for building a credible evidentiary record. In re: StubHub Refund Litigation , No. 22-15879 (9th Cir. Citing Sellers v.

e-records 98

e-records Court Law Law 98

Eric Goldman

MARCH 29, 2023

By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Mitrakos, 22-CCB-0035 , February 15, 2023, and Oppenheimer v. Prutton, 22-CCB-0045 , February 28, 2023. Prutton, 22-CCB-0045 , February 28, 2023. Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down.

e-filing 105

e-filing Court Failure-to-appear Dispute resolution 105

Debevoise Data Blog

NOVEMBER 21, 2023

Key takeaways from October include: Employee monitoring: Following new guidance issued by the UK ICO, employers may want to review their existing employee monitoring to ensure it meets the regulator’s latest expectations, including ensuring that any monitoring is necessary, proportionate, and conducted transparently.

Data protection 52

Data protection Compliance Failure-to-appear e-records 52

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 26, 2024

Heuberger , 2023 WL 5334192 (D. Alderwood Surgical Center, LLC, 2023 WL 3435305 (W.D. May 12, 2023); and State v. Alderwood Surgical Center, LLC, 2023 WL 3687053 (W.D. May 26, 2023). Pinho, 2023 WL 3017282 (Cal. April 20, 2023). Lulifama.com LLC, 2023 U.S. July 20, 2023).

Defendant 98

Defendant e-records Court Failure-to-appear 98

Eric Goldman

JUNE 20, 2023

21-869 (May 18, 2023). [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. This post is 11,000+ words long, so you may want to block out some time to enjoy this properly.] By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa By a 7-2 vote, the U.S. Goldsmith , No.

Court 98

Court Failure-to-appear e-discovery e-records 98