Martindale-Avvo

FEBRUARY 12, 2025

In late 2023, The New York Times sued OpenAI alleging that it trained ChatGPT on copyrighted Times material without permission. As generative AI continues to roll out everywhere from Google search results to chatbots on law firm websites, more legal action over the training material is sure to arise. Instead, the U.S.

Intellectual Property 59

Intellectual Property Data protection Defendant Federal law 59

Inside Privacy

JANUARY 4, 2024

In late December 2023, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) published a Report and Order (“Order”) expanding the scope of the data breach notification rules (“Rules”) applicable to telecommunications carriers and interconnected VoIP (“iVoIP”) providers.

Data protection 79

Data protection Federal law State law Attorney 79

Debevoise Data Blog

OCTOBER 18, 2021

At the state level, California has banned law enforcement from installing, activating, or using biometric surveillance with body cameras until 2023. Vermont and Virginia have banned law enforcement from using facial recognition technology pending further legislative action.

Law 52

Law Law Court Time-tracking 52

Clio

JANUARY 30, 2024

Law firm data security should be a top priority for any practice, and here’s why: Clients trust you with their most confidential information. Since clients entrust lawyers with so much of their sensitive data, law firms make prime targets for cybercrime. You don’t want your law firm to become part of that statistic.

Law firm 98

Law firm Law Law Due diligence 98

Debevoise Data Blog

JULY 12, 2022

state privacy law, including updates to the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) and the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), the Colorado Protect Personal Data Privacy Act (“ColoPA”), the Connecticut Privacy Act (“CTPA”), the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (“VCDPA”), and the Utah Consumer Privacy Act (“UCPA”).

State law 52

State law Federal law Compliance Data protection 52

Technology Law Dispatch

FEBRUARY 22, 2023

The Court of Justice of the European Union (“ CJEU ”) issued a judgment on the 9 th of February 2023 (docket no. C-453/21) , which addresses the question of the dismissal of a Data Protection Officer (“ DPO ”) and the interpretation of Article 38 of the EU GDPR. KG. (“ X-FAB ”) and several of its group companies.

Data protection 59

Data protection Court Compliance Federal law 59